Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Rheumatol Int ; 30(5): 705-7, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20020136

ABSTRACT

It is important that inflammatory arthropathies such as rheumatoid arthritis be diagnosed promptly so that treatment can be administered in a timely fashion. However, there is considerable evidence that this process of care is delayed in many people. The aim of the study is to assess wait times between primary care referral and rheumatology assessment for new-onset inflammatory arthropathies. We performed a retrospective review related to new rheumatology consultations (N = 202) between September and November 2008 within the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada. At this centre, no formal triaging of rheumatology referrals exists. Of the 202 charts reviewed, wait times could be calculated in 164 cases. Only consultations for new-onset conditions were analyzed (N = 161). The results showed that patients with inflammatory arthritis were seen approximately 34.6 days (median 26) post-referral. Wait times for individuals who were ultimately diagnosed with non-urgent conditions (osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia and soft-tissue rheumatism) averaged 41.0 days (median 29). In conclusions, compared to non-urgent cases, individuals with inflammatory arthritis were seen about 1 week sooner. Nevertheless, provisional diagnosis provided on referrals did not appear to expedite wait times for persons with suspected inflammatory arthritis. This suggested that other factors, such as the concern of the patient, may have an influence on referral wait times. Implementation of a rapid access program or triage system may be helpful to further decrease wait times for inflammatory arthropathies.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Rheumatic Diseases/diagnosis , Rheumatology/statistics & numerical data , Waiting Lists , Ambulatory Care Facilities/organization & administration , Efficiency, Organizational , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Humans , Organizational Objectives , Quebec , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Retrospective Studies , Rheumatic Diseases/therapy , Rheumatology/organization & administration , Time Factors
2.
Arch Pediatr ; 15(8): 1332-48, 2008 Aug.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18562184

ABSTRACT

Current evaluations used by occupational therapists to assess and treat feeding problems derive mainly from the domain of dysphagia. The purpose of this article is to familiarize the reader with tools used, in research, for children with pervasive developmental disorders (PDD) and to determine if any of these meet the needs of occupational therapists. The following data bases were searched: Medline, CINAHL, HAPI and PsyINFO, using the terms pervasive developmental disorder, autism, Asperger syndrome, pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified, eating behavior, eating disorder, food preference, food selectivity, feeding disorders, picky eater and child. All articles published between 1980 and 2006 (n=27) were reviewed. A total of 20 studies met our selection criteria. Assessment methods are compared using the Disability Creation Model (DCP). The DCP is the Quebec alternative to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). None of the evaluation tools reviewed met all factors that may influence eating in children with PDD. Implications for research and practice in occupational therapy are discussed.


Subject(s)
Child Development Disorders, Pervasive/therapy , Feeding Behavior , Food Preferences , Adolescent , Asperger Syndrome/therapy , Autistic Disorder/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Diet Records , Humans , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
J Rheumatol ; 28(3): 604-9, 2001 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11296967

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Although many clinicians believe high growth leads to inflexibility, which may lead to lower extremity pain, the only prospective data suggest growth is unrelated to flexibility. However, it is still possible that growth and/or flexibility are related to pain even if they are not related to each other. We investigated the incidence of leg pain in adolescents to determine whether high growth spurt and/or poor flexibility are risk factors for the development of lower extremity pain. METHODS: Repeated measures, prospective cohort study of urban high school students aged 12-18. Subjects were measured at baseline and at 6 and 12 months for flexibility of hamstrings and quadriceps and with the sit-and-reach test. Participants completed a detailed questionnaire on recreational activity, occupational activities, psychosocial variables, and musculoskeletal pain. RESULTS: Poor hamstring flexibility (odds ratio 0.99, confidence interval 0.97-1.01), poor quadriceps flexibility (OR 1.01, CI 0.99-1.03), poor sit-and-reach flexibility (OR 0.99, CI 0.99-1.01), and growth (OR 0.93, CI 0.50-1.71) were not related to the development of lower extremity pain. There was an association between lower extremity pain and occupational activities (OR 2.08, CI 1.45-2.98) and poor mental health (per 1 SD change, OR 1.41, CI 1.19-1.67). CONCLUSION: Neither growth nor flexibility is related to the development of lower extremity pain in adolescents. A poor mental health score and occupational activities may be associated with the development of lower extremity pain.


Subject(s)
Leg/growth & development , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Pain/epidemiology , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Incidence , Leg/physiology , Male , Mental Health , Musculoskeletal Diseases/psychology , Pain/psychology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stress, Psychological
4.
Phys Ther ; 76(2): 150-6; discussion 156-7, 1996 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8592718

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study described the physical therapy referral of workers compensated for back injury; characterized physical therapy by duration and choice of therapeutic techniques; and compared workers who were and were not referred for physical therapy in terms of age, gender, diagnosis, and absence from work. SUBJECT: A cohort of 2,147 subjects were randomly selected from 54,401 workers compensated for back injuries in 1988. METHODS: Each subject was followed for 2 years from date of entry into the study. Data were obtained from the Quebec Worker's Compensation Board computerized files, medical files, and initial reports completed by physical therapists. RESULTS: Of the cohort, 389 subjects (18%) had received physical therapy after referral by their physician. Exercise, heat, ultrasound, back education, manipulation, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation were the most frequently selected treatments. Implementation of physical therapy within 1 month of back injury had a strong protective effect on return to work within 60 days. Female gender and presence of a specific diagnosis were predictors for greater than 60 days' absence. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that physicians request physical therapy services based on certain patient characteristics. Patients who were referred earlier tended to return to work sooner than those who were referred later, which indicates that timing of physical therapy is an important factor in the rehabilitation of workers with low back pain.


Subject(s)
Low Back Pain/rehabilitation , Occupational Diseases/rehabilitation , Physical Therapy Modalities , Referral and Consultation , Absenteeism , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Physical Therapy Modalities/methods , Sampling Studies , Sex Factors , Time Factors , Workers' Compensation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...