Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Angle Orthod ; 79(6): 1194-6, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19852615

ABSTRACT

Although nickel is the most common cause of contact allergy, nickel-containing orthodontic appliances seldom cause adverse reactions that result in discontinuation of treatment. We report on an eruption of dermatitis in the face and neck of an adult female patient after placement of a rapid maxillary expansion appliance (RME). Because the patient suspected nickel allergy, her tolerance to the appliance material was tested intraorally before treatment by cementing bands on four teeth for a week. No visible adverse reactions were seen during the test. One week after cementation of the RME appliance, the patient reported strong itching of the face and a red rash. Clinical examination showed itchy papular erythema on the face and neck. No intraoral reactions or symptoms were present. The RME appliance was removed, and symptoms disappeared in 4 to 5 days. The patient was referred for a nickel patch test, which gave a strong positive result. Adverse patient reactions of potential allergic origin should be diagnosed carefully, and their possible impact on further treatment should be evaluated accordingly.


Subject(s)
Dental Alloys/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Facial Dermatoses/etiology , Neck/pathology , Orthodontic Appliances/adverse effects , Palatal Expansion Technique/instrumentation , Stainless Steel/adverse effects , Adult , Cobalt/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Nickel/adverse effects , Palladium/adverse effects , Patch Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...