Removal of a large symptomatic retrocardiac mediastinal lipoma.

Large mediastinal lipomas are rare. Complete surgical resection can be difficult due to the intricate anatomy in the mediastinum. We report the case of a 75-year-old man with worsened retrosternal pressure, decline in performance and syncope episodes. Computed tomography revealed a large retrocardiac low-attenuated mediastinal lesion measuring 10 × 8 cm, compressing the left atrium and pulmonary veins bilaterally. Surgical exploration was achieved through a right anterolateral thoracotomy with a successful en bloc resection without any intraoperative complications. The total operation time was 185 min with a total blood loss of <250 ml. Stand-by extracorporeal life support was present throughout the procedure, but its use was not required. The postoperative course was uneventful. The pathological examination revealed a mature mediastinal lipoma without any evidence of malignancy. In the 12-month control the patient was completely free of symptoms and in a good general condition.

Foreign Glass Bodies in Pleura and Pancreas: Systematic Review for Entry Hypotheses and Treatment Options in an Unresolved Case.

BACKGROUND: Foreign bodies within the pleura and pancreas are infrequent, and the approaches to their treatment still a subject of debate. There is limited knowledge particularly regarding glass foreign bodies. METHODS: We present a case involving large glass splinters in the pleura and pancreas, with an unknown entry point. In addition, a systematic review was conducted to explore entry hypotheses and management options. RESULTS: In addition to our case, our review uncovered eight incidents of intrapleural glass, and another eight cases of glass in other intrathoracic areas. The fragments entered the body through impalement (81%), migrated through the diaphragm after impalement (6%), or caused transesophageal perforation (19%) following ingestion. Eight instances of glass inside the abdominal cavity were documented, with seven resulting from impalement injuries and one from transintestinal migration. There were no recorded instances of glass being discovered within the pancreas. Among the 41 nonglass intrapancreatic foreign bodies found, sewing needles (34%) and fish bones (46%) were the most common; following ingestion, they had migrated through either a transgastric or transduodenal perforation. In all these cases, how the foreign bodies were introduced was often poorly recalled by the patient. Many nonglass foreign bodies tend to become encapsulated by fibrous tissue, rendering them inert, though this is less common with glass. Glass has been reported to migrate through various tissues and cavities, sometimes with a significant delay spanning even decades. There are cases of intrapleural migration of glass causing hemothorax, pneumothorax, and heart and major blood vessels injury. For intrapleural glass fragment management, thoracoscopy proved to be effective in 5 reported cases, in addition to our patient. Most intrapancreatic nonglass foreign bodies tend to trigger pancreatitis and abscess formation, necessitating management ranging from laparoscopic procedures to subtotal pancreatectomy. There have been only four documented cases of intrapancreatic needles that remained asymptomatic with conservative management. There is no direct guidance from the existing literature regarding management of intrapancreatic glass foreign bodies. Consequently, our patient is under observation with regular follow-ups and has remained asymptomatic for the past 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Glass foreign bodies in the pleura are rare, and our report of an intrapancreatic glass fragment is the first of its kind. Impalement is the most likely method of introduction. As glass has significant migration and an ensuing complication potential, preventive removal of intrapleural loose glass should be considered. However, intrapancreatic glass fragment management remains uncertain.

Effect of ß-Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide on Acute Allograft Rejection After Rat Lung Transplantation.

Acute rejection is still a major limitation for a successful outcome in lung transplantation. Since ß-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) has been shown to have various immunomodulatory properties on the innate and adaptive immune system, we evaluate here a potential protective effect of NAD+ against acute lung rejection. Methods: Rat single-lung transplantation was performed in 2 groups (n = 8 per group), using Brown-Norway donors and major histocompatibility complex-mismatched Lewis recipients. Recipients of the NAD+ group received 1000 mg/kg NAD+ intraperitoneally before transplantation and daily thereafter until euthanasia, whereas the control group received saline solution. At autopsy on day 5, blood samples were analyzed and the lung allograft was assessed by bronchioalveolar lavage, histology, and immunochemistry. Results: The NAD+ group maintained an intact compliant lung tissue, a strong trend of lower acute cellular rejection (A3 versus A3-A4) and significantly less lymphocytic bronchiolitis (B0-B2R versus B1R-Bx). In addition, a trend of fewer alveolar CD68+ macrophages and significantly fewer interstitial CD163+ macrophages was observed. Bronchoalveolar lavage in the NAD+ group showed significantly fewer proinflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-6, IL-13, TNFα, and a protective IL-6/IL-10-ratio. In blood samples, we observed significantly fewer neutrophils, and proinflammatory GRO/KC in the NAD+ group. Conclusions: NAD+ might be a promising substance in prevention of acute allograft rejection in lung transplantation.

Current status and further potential of lung donation after circulatory death.

Chronic organ shortage remains the most limiting factor in lung transplantation. To overcome this shortage, a minority of centers have started with efforts to reintroduce donation after circulatory death (DCD). This review aims to evaluate the experimental background, the current international clinical experience, and the further potential and challenges of the different DCD categories. Successful strategies have been implemented to reduce the problems of warm ischemic time, thrombosis after circulatory arrest, and difficulties in organ assessment, which come with DCD donation. From the currently reported results, controlled-DCD lungs are an effective and safe method with good mid-term and even long-term survival outcomes comparable to donation after brain death (DBD). Primary graft dysfunction and onset of chronic allograft dysfunction seem also comparable. Thus, controlled-DCD lungs should be ceased to be treated as marginal and instead be promoted as an equivalent alternative to DBD. A wide implementation of controlled-DCD-lung donation would significantly decrease the mortality on the waiting list. Therefore, further efforts in establishment of legislation and logistics are crucial. With regard to uncontrolled DCD, more data are needed analyzing long-term outcomes. To help with the detailed assessment and improvement of uncontrolled or otherwise questionable grafts after retrieval, ex-vivo lung perfusion is promising.

A new lung donor score to predict short and long-term survival in lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Donor selection criteria are crucial for a successful lung transplant outcome. Our objective was to develop a new donor score to predict short- and long-term survival and validate it with five existing lung donor scores (Oto, Eurotransplant, Minnesota, Maryland-UNOS, Louisville-UNOS). METHODS: All 454 adult lung transplants at our center between 1992-2015 were included to develop a new score. Discriminative ability for all scores was calculated by the area under time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (time-dependent AUC) at 30-day, 1, 5 and 10-year survival, and their fit compared with Akaike's information criterion. For the new score, five pre-selected donor risk factors were derived: age, diabetes mellitus, smoking history, pulmonary infection, PaO2/FiO2-ratio, weighed via simplification of a multiple Cox model, and shrinkage used to avoid overfitting. The score sub-weighting resulted in a total of 17 points. RESULTS: The existing scores showed predictive accuracy better than chance in prediction of survival of 5-year (AUC 0.58-0.60) to 10-year survival (AUC 0.58-0.64). Our new score had better discriminative ability as the existing scores with regard to 1, 5 and 10-year survival (AUC 0.59, 0.64, 0.66, respectively). Additional adjustment for recipient and surgical procedure variables improved the time-dependent AUC's slightly. For the secondary outcomes primary graft dysfunction and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, the new score showed also a good predictive accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed Zurich Donor Score is simple, well adapted for the current urge of extended donors use, and shows higher discriminative ability compared to preexisting donor scores regarding short- to long-term survival.

Lung transplantation in the elderly: Influence of age, comorbidities, underlying disease, and extended criteria donor lungs.

OBJECTIVE: As large registries show an increased risk for lung transplant recipients aged 60 years or more, few single centers report favorable outcomes for carefully selected older recipients without providing essential details. The purpose of our study was to determine variables that influence survival in the elderly. METHODS: All adult bilateral first lung transplants between January 2000 and December 2014 were divided in 2 groups: those aged less than 60 years (N = 223) and those aged 60 years or more (N = 83). The Charlson-Deyo Index determined recipient comorbidities. The Oto Donor Score assessed donor lung quality. RESULTS: Recipients aged 60 years or more had a significant lower median survival compared with their younger counterparts (48 vs 112 months, respectively, P < .001). Recipient age was as an exponentially increasing univariate risk factor for mortality. By adjusting for variables in multivariate analysis, this trend was nonsignificant. The displacing variables were idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-2.2), Charlson-Deyo Index 2 or greater (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.8), systemic hypertension (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.6), gastroesophageal reflux (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1), diverticulosis (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-2.7), and an Oto Donor Score 8 or greater (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.0). All of these risk factors were significantly more likely to occur in recipients aged 60 years or more, except for a tendency for high Charlson-Deyo Index. CONCLUSIONS: The comorbidity profile, underlying disease, and donor lung quality appear to be more important than age in reducing long-term survival. Older age serves as a marker for a complex constellation of factors that might be considered the relative or absolute contraindication to lung transplantation rather than age, per se.