Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 72(10): 1937-1941, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36660978

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To assess the recurrence and disease-free survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients, and to compare them between two age groups. METHODS: Data were extracted from Patel hospital cancer registry database of patients admitted from January 1st2008 to December 31st 2018 based on retrospective diagnosed with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Patient stratified in to two groups i.e. patients with less than or more than 40 years. Various etiological factors, staging, treatment, site of the tumor and recurrence and mortality were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 450 patients, 124(27.5%) were in group A and 327(72.5%) were in group B. There were 101(81%) males in group A and 240(73.4%) males in group B. The overall mean age was 43.63±10.75 years (range: 22-70 years). The most common site of the tumour was cheek 232(51.5%). Recurrence of tumour was 45(36%) in group A and 120(37%) in group B (p=0.653). Overall mortality in group A was 67(54%) compared to 168(51%) in group B (p=0.811). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality and disease recurrence in both age groups was almost the same. Cheek was the most common site of presentation.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Mouth Neoplasms , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Mouth Neoplasms/epidemiology , Mouth Neoplasms/therapy , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Young Adult , Aged
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 12(10)2019 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31619398

ABSTRACT

Iron isomaltose is considered as safe form of iron with no test dose recommended. Here, we are describing the case of a patient who experienced allergic reaction with this formulation of iron. A 35-year-old South Asian woman experienced allergic reaction, she had mild wheeze on examination of chest. She was given intranasal oxygen at 2 L/min. She was given intravenous acetaminophen 1 g for pain relief, 45.4 mg intravenous chlorphenaramine and intravenous 100 mg hydrocortisone. Within half an hour, all her symptoms improved and her hypoxia resolved. Her chest wheezing also disappeared. Iron isomaltose, although relatively safe, can cause allergic reaction. Intravenous iron can cause allergic reaction therefore it should be administered at the facility where trained staff is present so that necessary treatment can be given in case of hypersensitivity reaction.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Drug Hypersensitivity/drug therapy , Hydrocortisone/therapeutic use , Iron/adverse effects , Isomaltose/adverse effects , Adult , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Dyspnea , Female , Humans , Iron/immunology , Isomaltose/immunology , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...