A randomized trial of safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of concizumab in people with hemophilia A.

Essentials explorer™3 was a double-blinded, multiple-dose escalation trial of subcutaneous concizumab. A pharmacodynamic relationship for unbound TFPI and thrombin generation was confirmed. No serious adverse events and no anti-drug antibodies were observed. explorer™3 data support further clinical development of concizumab in people with hemophilia. SUMMARY: Background Concizumab is a humanized mAb targeting tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), leading to enhanced thrombin generation (TG) potential. explorer™3 (NCT02490787) was a phase 1b, double-blind, multiple-dose escalation trial of subcutaneous concizumab in people with severe hemophilia A without inhibitors. Objectives The primary objective was to evaluate safety. Assessments of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and subcutaneous concizumab immunogenicity were secondary objectives. Patients/Methods Adverse events (AEs), clinical assessments and bleeding episodes were recorded. Plasma concizumab levels and unbound TFPI levels were measured with ELISAs; residual TFPI activity was measured with a chromogenic assay. Standardized assays were used to assess TG, D-dimer and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2 ) levels. explorer™3 was completed after investigation of three dose cohorts (0.25, 0.5 and 0.8 mg kg-1 , once every 4 days) had been completed. Twenty-four patients received 12 doses of concizumab or placebo in a 3 : 1 randomization over a 42-day period. Results No serious AEs and no anti-drug antibodies were observed. Fifty-four mild and two moderate AEs were observed in 19 patients. Concizumab exposure increased with dose in a non-linear manner, confirming target-mediated drug disposition. D-dimer and F1 + 2 levels were increased mostly in the highest dose cohort, in line with previous observations. The level of unbound TFPI decreased in a dose-dependent manner, and was accompanied by a residual TFPI activity decrease and an increase in peak TG. Although the trial was not powered to evaluate efficacy, a trend towards lower bleeding rates was observed in patients in the highest dose cohort. Conclusion explorer™3 data support further clinical development of concizumab for use in people with hemophilia, with or without inhibitors.

Co-morbidities and bleeding in elderly patients with haemophilia-A survey of the German, Austrian and Swiss Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Research (GTH).

BACKGROUND: Nowadays patients with haemophilia survive longer due to improvements in haemophilia care. It has been hypothesized that the bleeding type and frequency may vary with age and are influenced by co-morbidities and co-medication in elderly patients. OBJECTIVES: To investigate a large group of patients older than 60 years of age with haemophilia concerning haemophilia treatment, bleeding pattern changes, co-morbidities, co-medication, bleeding sites and patient mortality. METHODS: A retrospective multi-centre data collection study was initiated on behalf of the German, Austrian and Swiss Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Research (GTH). Parameters of interest were investigated over the 5 years prior to study entry. RESULTS: A total of 185 haemophilia patients (mean age, 69.0±7.0 years, 29% with severe haemophilia) were included in the study. Regular prophylaxis was performed in 30% of the patients with severe haemophilia. In total, the annual bleeding rate was 2.49 and in patients with severe haemophilia 5.61, mostly caused by joint bleeds. Hypertension was the most common co-morbidity, but it occurred significantly less frequently than in an age-matched general population older than 70 years; 12% of the patients suffered from ischaemic heart disease, and 13% of the patients received anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. Within the observation period, 17% of the patients with severe haemophilia developed a higher frequency of bleeding symptoms, which was significantly associated with the use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The most common co-morbidity of the patient population was hypertension, a considerable part had ischemic heart disease and antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs.

[Coagulation management in geriatric surgery]. / Gerinnungsmanagement in der Alterschirurgie.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients often suffer from cardiovascular diseases and are treated with anticoagulation medications, which must be taken into consideration when planning elective surgery. OBJECTIVE: The etiology, diagnostic work-up and clinical management of selected inherited and acquired hemophilic and thrombophilic coagulation disorders are described. METHODS: Data from clinical studies, current guidelines and expert opinions are discussed. RESULTS: Beside inherited hemophilic coagulation defects, elderly patients very frequently show an acquired bleeding tendency caused by the intake of analgesic drugs or long-term medication due to cardiovascular diseases. In rare cases, elderly patients can develop acquired hemophilia caused by autoantibodies to coagulation factors resulting in a severe bleeding disorder. Moreover, elderly patients have an increased risk to develop venous or arterial thrombotic events. Prior to surgery a relevant bleeding tendency should be excluded by the combination of medical history, clinical investigation and screening of laboratory parameters. If laboratory parameters are outside the normal range, e.g. a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), the reasons must be clarified prior to an elective surgery. CONCLUSION: The clinical management of elderly patients under anticoagulation treatment should start early and must also cover the post-surgery period. When planning treatment for patients at risk, a physician qualified in clinical hemostaseology should be consulted. For the management of thrombosis prophylaxis, the implementation of clinical guidelines is a valuable measure.

"Threshold-crossing": A Useful Way to Establish the Counterfactual in Clinical Trials?

A central question in the assessment of benefit/harm of new treatments is: how does the average outcome on the new treatment (the factual) compare to the average outcome had patients received no treatment or a different treatment known to be effective (the counterfactual)? Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the standard for comparing the factual with the counterfactual. Recent developments necessitate and enable a new way of determining the counterfactual for some new medicines. For select situations, we propose a new framework for evidence generation, which we call "threshold-crossing." This framework leverages the wealth of information that is becoming available from completed RCTs and from real world data sources. Relying on formalized procedures, information gleaned from these data is used to estimate the counterfactual, enabling efficacy assessment of new drugs. We propose future (research) activities to enable "threshold-crossing" for carefully selected products and indications in which RCTs are not feasible.

Real World Data in Adaptive Biomedical Innovation: A Framework for Generating Evidence Fit for Decision-Making.

Analyses of healthcare databases (claims, electronic health records [EHRs]) are useful supplements to clinical trials for generating evidence on the effectiveness, harm, use, and value of medical products in routine care. A constant stream of data from the routine operation of modern healthcare systems, which can be analyzed in rapid cycles, enables incremental evidence development to support accelerated and appropriate access to innovative medicines. Evidentiary needs by regulators, Health Technology Assessment, payers, clinicians, and patients after marketing authorization comprise (1) monitoring of medication performance in routine care, including the materialized effectiveness, harm, and value; (2) identifying new patient strata with added value or unacceptable harms; and (3) monitoring targeted utilization. Adaptive biomedical innovation (ABI) with rapid cycle database analytics is successfully enabled if evidence is meaningful, valid, expedited, and transparent. These principles will bring rigor and credibility to current efforts to increase research efficiency while upholding evidentiary standards required for effective decision-making in healthcare.

Pharmaceuticals Licensing and Reimbursement in the European Union, United States, and Japan.

This article describes recent developments in licensing and reimbursement policies in the EU, US, and Japan, examines causes of changes and compares differences and projects trends. With respect to licensing, the European Medicines Agency (EMA), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and Japan's Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) are committed to rigorous evaluation of pharmaceuticals in advance of market access with feedback from postmarket experience. The EMA is exploring integrated adaptive pathways for licensing, with formal pilot tests to provide a practical proof of concept. The FDA is augmenting traditional licensing procedures through reforms including Breakthrough Product Designation. The PMDA is implementing reforms to foster innovation and earlier patient access through its Sakigake strategy and licensing reforms on regenerative medicines. With respect to reimbursement, several generalizations emerge. Relative to US counterparts, EU payers typically set higher standards for evidence of effectiveness as a condition of reimbursement, impose tougher limits on reimbursement by indication, and drive harder deals in negotiations over prices.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of factor VIII binding antibodies in acquired hemophilia A: data from the GTH-AH 01/2010 study.

UNLABELLED: Essentials Factor VIII (FVIII) binding IgG detected by ELISA could be an alternative to the Bethesda assay. We studied the performance of anti-FVIII IgG ELISA in patients with acquired hemophilia and controls. Anti-FVIII IgG > 99th percentile of controls was highly sensitive and specific. Patients with high anti-FVIII IgG have a lower chance of achieving remission. SUMMARY: Background Acquired hemophilia A is a severe bleeding disorder that requires fast and accurate diagnosis as it occurs often unexpectedly in previously healthy men and women of every age. The Nijmegen-modified Bethesda assay is the diagnostic reference standard for detecting neutralizing autoantibodies against factor VIII (FVIII), but is not widely available, not ideal for quantifying the complex type 2 inhibitors seen in acquired hemophilia, and suffers from high inter-laboratory variability. Objectives To assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of FVIII-binding antibodies as detected by ELISA compared with the Nijmegen Bethesda assay. Methods Samples from the time of first diagnosis and clinical data were available from 102 patients with acquired hemophilia enrolled in the prospective GTH-AH 01/2010 study. Controls (n = 102) were matched for gender and age. Diagnostic cut-offs were determined by receiver-operator curve analysis. The prognostic value was assessed in 92 of the 102 patients by Cox regression analysis of time to partial remission. Results Anti-FVIII IgG above the 99th percentile (> 15 arbitrary units per mL) revealed high sensitivity and specificity (both 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.0) for diagnosing acquired hemophilia. The likelihood of achieving partial remission was related to anti-FVIII IgG concentration (< 300 arbitrary units, 1.0; 300-1050, 0.65; > 1050, 0.39). The Bethesda titer was only associated with the likelihood of partial remission when analyzed in the central laboratory, but not when data from local GTH study sites were used. Conclusion Although the Nijmegen-modified Bethesda assay is the reference standard for demonstrating neutralizing antibodies, the detection of FVIII-binding antibodies by ELISA is similarly sensitive and specific for diagnosing acquired hemophilia. In addition, anti-FVIII IgG may provide prognostic information.

Incorporating patient preferences into drug development and regulatory decision making: Results from a quantitative pilot study with cancer patients, carers, and regulators.

Currently, patient preference studies are not required to be included in marketing authorization applications to regulatory authorities, and the role and methodology for such studies have not been agreed upon. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) conducted a pilot study to gain experience on how the collection of individual preferences can inform the regulatory review. Using a short online questionnaire, ordinal statements regarding the desirability of different outcomes in the treatment of advanced cancer were elicited from 139 participants (98 regulators, 29 patient or carers, and 12 healthcare professionals). This was followed by face-to-face meetings to gather feedback and validate the individual responses. In this article we summarize the EMA pilot study and discuss the role of patient preference studies within the regulatory review. Based on the results, we conclude that our preference elicitation instrument was easy to implement and sufficiently precise to learn about the distribution of the participants' individual preferences.

Structured Frameworks to Increase the Transparency of the Assessment of Benefits and Risks of Medicines: Current Status and Possible Future Directions.

Structured frameworks for benefit-risk analysis in drug licensing decisions are being implemented across a number of regulatory agencies worldwide. The aim of these frameworks is to aid the analysis and communication of the benefit-risk assessment throughout the development, evaluation, and supervision of medicines. In this review, authors from regulatory agencies, pharmaceutical companies, and academia share their views on the different frameworks and discuss future directions.

From adaptive licensing to adaptive pathways: delivering a flexible life-span approach to bring new drugs to patients.

The concept of adaptive licensing (AL) has met with considerable interest. Yet some remain skeptical about its feasibility. Others argue that the focus and name of AL should be broadened. Against this background of ongoing debate, we examine the environmental changes that will likely make adaptive pathways the preferred approach in the future. The key drivers include: growing patient demand for timely access to promising therapies, emerging science leading to fragmentation of treatment populations, rising payer influence on product accessibility, and pressure on pharma/investors to ensure sustainability of drug development. We also discuss a number of environmental changes that will enable an adaptive paradigm. A life-span approach to bringing innovation to patients is expected to help address the perceived access vs. evidence trade-off, help de-risk drug development, and lead to better outcomes for patients.

Accelerated access to innovative medicines for patients in need.

There is broad agreement among health-care stakeholders that more must be done to ensure that patients have timely access to new and innovative medicines. Assuming that industry will continue to develop such medicines at a sustainable rate, regulators and payers become the gatekeepers. Regulators, starting in the late 1980s/early 1990s, and, more recently, payers have implemented a variety of early-access pathways or initiatives, and this practice is continuing even today. This article describes the specific approaches that have been taken in four economically developed regions, reviews their success rates, and suggests possible new directions.

A proposal for integrated efficacy-to-effectiveness (E2E) clinical trials.

We propose an "efficacy-to-effectiveness" (E2E) clinical trial design, in which an effectiveness trial would commence seamlessly upon completion of the efficacy trial. Efficacy trials use inclusion/exclusion criteria to produce relatively homogeneous samples of participants with the target condition, conducted in settings that foster adherence to rigorous clinical protocols. Effectiveness trials use inclusion/exclusion criteria that generate heterogeneous samples that are more similar to the general patient spectrum, conducted in more varied settings, with protocols that approximate typical clinical care. In E2E trials, results from the efficacy trial component would be used to design the effectiveness trial component, to confirm and/or discern associations between clinical characteristics and treatment effects in typical care, and potentially to test new hypotheses. An E2E approach may improve the evidentiary basis for selecting treatments, expand understanding of the effectiveness of treatments in subgroups with particular clinical features, and foster incorporation of effectiveness information into regulatory processes.

Regulatory review: How do agencies ensure the quality of decision making?

The Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS) Workshop on Regulatory Review brought together international regulators and multinational pharmaceutical company representatives to focus on best practices that underlie regulatory decision making, thereby facilitating the transparent, timely, procedurally predictable, and good-quality evaluation of new medicines. Participants investigated frameworks used by agencies, discussed challenges for regulatory agencies in making quality decisions, investigated the role of other stakeholders, and made recommendations of activities and processes that agencies and companies can consider to enable quality decision making.

Results of the WIRK prospective, non-interventional observational study of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) in patients with congenital haemophilia with inhibitors and other bleeding disorders.

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) has been available for the treatment of acute bleeding and for prevention of bleeding during surgery and invasive procedures in patients with congenital haemophilia with inhibitors (CHwI) and acquired haemophilia since 1996. The study objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of rFVIIa in patients with CHwI, acquired haemophilia, congenital FVII deficiency and Glanzmann's thrombasthenia, in a real-life clinical setting. There were no specific inclusion or exclusion criteria; participation was offered to all German haemophilia centres known to use rFVIIa to treat patients with the above indications. Data on rFVIIa use and efficacy for the treatment of acute bleeding episodes and invasive procedures were recorded. Adverse drug reactions and recurrent bleeding episodes were also monitored. In total, 64 patients (50.0% women) received rFVIIa treatment. Patients experienced 281 evaluable bleeding episodes and underwent 44 invasive procedures. In 252 of 281 (89.7%) bleeding episodes, a stop (66.5%) or a significant reduction (23.1%) in bleeding was observed. No bleeding complications were reported for 42 of 44 (95.5%) invasive procedures covered with rFVIIa. A clear positive association was observed between early initiation of rFVIIa treatment for acute bleeding and efficacy. The total cumulative dose and number of injections were 468.3 ± 545.8 µg kg(-1) and 3.6 ± 4.6 respectively. No drug-related adverse events were reported. rFVIIa use in Germany provided effective haemostatic cover without associated adverse events in the management of acute bleeds and invasive procedures across a range of bleeding disorders.

Gatekeepers and enablers: how drug regulators respond to a challenging and changing environment by moving toward a proactive attitude.

This article analyzes the role of regulatory authorities in facilitating innovation in the pharmaceutical sector. We describe how regulators are expanding their role to be not only gatekeepers but also enablers of development. They have already responded to the challenging and changing environment by moving toward a proactive attitude beyond evaluation of products, thereby more actively contributing to their development. Regulators have to continuously evolve their knowledge and standards alongside evolution in science. Creation of supportive regulatory frameworks and multistakeholder interaction will help address unmet regulatory needs.

Advancing the science of medicines regulation: the role of the 21st-century medicines regulator.

The history of medicines regulation is punctuated with sudden swings in focus mandated by a public injured by medicines and skeptical of regulators' abilities to protect them. As stakeholder communities and the science that undergirds medicines have both grown more sophisticated, seemingly conflicting mission equities, such as public health protection vs. promotion or population vs. individual patient product development focus, have created new challenges to defining the mission and role of twenty-first-century medicines regulators. The role of medicines regulators as a nationally focused, retrospective assessor of data is rapidly shifting to that of a prospective generator of public data and tools to help drive what has now become a global product development and regulatory enterprise that is fast gaining recognition as an integral part of any truly effective twenty-first-century health-care system. This article discusses this evolution and describes how regulatory science will help to both drive and define it.

Adaptive licensing: taking the next step in the evolution of drug approval.

Traditional drug licensing approaches are based on binary decisions. At the moment of licensing, an experimental therapy is presumptively transformed into a fully vetted, safe, efficacious therapy. By contrast, adaptive licensing (AL) approaches are based on stepwise learning under conditions of acknowledged uncertainty, with iterative phases of data gathering and regulatory evaluation. This approach allows approval to align more closely with patient needs for timely access to new technologies and for data to inform medical decisions. The concept of AL embraces a range of perspectives. Some see AL as an evolutionary step, extending elements that are now in place. Others envision a transformative framework that may require legislative action before implementation. This article summarizes recent AL proposals; discusses how proposals might be translated into practice, with illustrations in different therapeutic areas; and identifies unresolved issues to inform decisions on the design and implementation of AL.

Pharmacokinetic properties of two different recombinant activated factor VII formulations.

Recombinant factor VIIa is indicated for treatment of bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A or B with inhibitors; in FVII deficiency and in Glanzmann's thrombasthenia. The aim of the study reported here was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles between two formulations of rFVIIa that are produced in two different cell lines and media: Chinese hamster ovary cells cultured in a serum-free medium (CHO-rFVIIa) and baby hamster kidney cells cultured in a non-human serum-based medium (BHK-rFVIIa). Two clinical trials were performed; one in healthy subjects and the other in patients with congenital haemophilia A or B, with or without inhibitors. Subjects were recruited into a two-way crossover trial and were randomized to receive a dose of CHO-rFVIIa and BHK-rFVIIa. Healthy subjects received one dose of 90 µg CHO-rFVIIa kg(-1) bodyweight (bw) in the newly developed room-temperature stable rFVIIa formulation and one dose of 90 µg BHK-rFVIIa kg(-1) bw, in the original rFVIIa formulation. Patients with haemophilia received one dose of 270 µg CHO-rFVIIa kg(-1) and one dose of 270 µg BHK-rFVIIa kg(-1), both in the room-temperature stable formulation. The trials showed higher FVII activity levels [higher area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC)] following administration of CHO-rFVIIa than after BHK-rFVIIa. Therefore, bioequivalence could not be established. The difference in FVII activity levels is believed to be a result of different glycosylation patterns between the two products. Neither the use of CHO-rFVIIa nor the use of one single dose of 270 µg kg(-1) of the newly developed room-temperature stable rFVIIa raised any safety concerns.