Sex and long-term outcomes after implantation of the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold for treatment of coronary artery disease.

AIMS: Women and men suffering from coronary artery disease differ in their risk profiles. We sought to investigate the impact of sex on two-year outcomes after BVS implantation in routine clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sex-based analysis of clinical outcomes was carried out by pooling the individual patient data of the ISAR-ABSORB and KUM-ABSORB registries performed in four high-volume tertiary centres in Munich. Of the total of 1,032 patients, 259 (25.1%) were women. The primary composite endpoint of death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI) and target lesion revascularisation (TLR) up to two years occurred in 13.2% of women and 17.9% of men (p=0.12). Compared to men, women experienced numerically lower rates of TLR and definite or probable BVS thrombosis - 7.5% vs 12.4% (p=0.051) and 1.2% and 2.7% (p=0.20), respectively. Independent predictors of increased risk for TLR were use of smaller size BVS (HR 1.28, 95% CI: 1.02-1.62), while being a woman was a protective factor (HR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.35-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: BVS used in a routine setting tend to perform better among women compared to men, which might be partially related to the lower complexity of their coronary artery disease.

Age-dependent impact of the SYNTAX-score on longer-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention in an all-comer population.

BACKGROUND: The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX)-score is a validated tool for risk stratification and revascularization strategy selection in patients with complex coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to analyse its age-related prognostic value. METHODS: SYNTAX-score was calculated in 1331 all-comer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): 463 patients ≥ 75 years and 868 patients < 75 years. Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality at one and two years. RESULTS: A significant interaction of age and SYNTAX-score for mortality was observed at two-year (P interaction = 0.019) but not at one-year follow-up (P interaction = 0.594). In multivariable analysis, SYNTAX-score independently predicted 1-year mortality in both age groups (< 75 years, hazard ratio (HR): 1.43, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.03-2.00, P = 0.034; and ≥ 75 years, HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.01-1.85, P = 0.042), but only two-year mortality among younger patients (< 75 years, HR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.01-1.76, P = 0.041; and ≥ 75 years, HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.87-1.41, P = 0.394). SYNTAX-score tertiles were useful to stratify 1-year mortality in both, patients < 75 years (SYNTAX-score < 9, 3.8%; 9-20, 5.3%; ≥ 20, 10.3%; P = 0.004) and ≥ 75 years (SYNTAX-score < 11, 5.7%; 11-22.5, 16.1%; ≥ 22.5, 18.7%; P = 0.003), but two-year mortality only among patients < 75 years (SYNTAX-score < 9, 6.5%; 9-20, 7.6%; ≥ 20, 15%; P < 0.001) and not among ≥ 75 years old patients (SYNTAX-score < 11, 19.4%; 11-22.5, 26.3%; ≥ 22.5, 27.9%; P = 0.138). CONCLUSIONS: Age modifies the impact of the SYNTAX-score on longer-term mortality after PCI. Among patients < 75 years, the SYNTAX-score independently predicts the risk of death at one and two years after PCI, while among patients ≥ 75 years its predictive role is limited to the first year after PCI. Further studies are needed to evaluate the value of SYNTAX-score for selecting the most appropriate revascularization strategy among elderly patients.

Impact of Clinical Presentation on Early Vascular Healing After Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Optimal strut coverage and early vascular healing are important factors to reduce the risk of stent thrombosis. Data on early vascular healing with the new bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) are lacking. Further, healing response after BVS implantation in different clinical presentation has not been fully investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed with optical coherence tomography (OCT) the early vascular response to BVS implantation in 26 consecutive patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or stable angina (SA). Images from 16 BVSs (17,166 struts) in ACS patients and 17 BVSs (23,045 struts) in SA patients were analyzed. The mean implanted BVS diameter and length was 3.1 ± 0.4 mm and 20.4 ± 5.8 mm. At mean 47.6 ± 6.3 days, overall 99% of BVS struts were covered. There were no differences between ACS and SA on the amount of tissue coverage per strut (0.09 ± 0.02 mm vs. 0.09 ± 0.01 mm; P = 0.86, respectively) and lumen area stenosis (24.2 ± 19.3% vs. 22.3 ± 22.0%; P = 0.78, respectively). However, a numerically higher proportion of protruding (ACS 1.2 ± 2.7%; SA 4.2 ± 6.5%; P = 0.11) and malapposed (ACS 0.4 ± 0.5%; SA 2.4 ± 5.8%; P = 0.18) struts were observed in SA compared to ACS, with trendy better healing score in ACS (1.87 ± 1.67 vs. 5.28 ± 7.28, P = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Early after BVS implantation almost complete scaffold strut coverage without any thrombi was observed by OCT, independent by the clinical presentation at index coronary intervention. However, BVS in ACS lesions were associated with easier strut penetration and a trendy better healing score compared with SA.

Impact of the bioresorbable vascular scaffold surface area on on-treatment platelet reactivity.

While promising data with the novel bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) are accumulating, signals of scaffold thrombosis (ST) were noted in recent reports. We aimed to assess the relationship between the total surface area (TSA) of implanted everolimus-eluting BVSs and the on-treatment adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet reactivity in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). 202 consecutive patients undergoing BVS implantation and platelet function testing were included. For investigating the impact of the scaffold surface on platelet reactivity, patients were stratified into two groups regarding the median BVS TSA. The on-treatment ADP-induced platelet reactivity was determined with the Multiplate analyzer and 30-day follow-up was available in 98% of patients. ADP-induced platelet aggregation values (median, [IQR]) did not differ between the two study groups (12.0 [9.0-19.0] U for patients with TSA > 1.39 cm(2) and 13.0 [9.0-19.5] U for patients with TSA ≤ 1.39 cm(2); p = 0.69). No correlation was observed between the BVS TSA and levels of platelet reactivity (Spearman rank correlation = -0.10, p = 0.16). At 30 days after PCI, two early STs (1%) were documented. Thus, in patients on a dual antiplatelet treatment regimen following BVS implantation, the extent of blood-to-BVS contact surface does not negatively affect levels of on-treatment platelet reactivity.

Contrast enhanced transesophageal echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation referred to electrical cardioversion improves atrial thrombus detection and may reduce associated thromboembolic events.

AIMS: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the gold standard for the detection of thrombi in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) before undergoing early electrical cardioversion (CV). However, TEE generates inconclusive results in a considerable number of patients. This study investigated the influence of contrast enhancement on interpretability of TEE for the detection of left atrial (LA) thrombi compared to conventional TEE and assessed, whether there are differences in the rate of thromboembolic events after electrical cardioversion. METHODS: Of 180 patients with AF (51 females, 65.2±13 years) who were referred to CV, 90 were examined with native imaging and contrast enhancement within the same examination (group 1), and 90 were examined with native TEE alone and served as control (group 2). Cineloops of the multiplane examination of the LA and LA appendage (LAA) were stored digitally before and, in group 1, after intravenous bolus application of a transpulmonary contrast agent. Images of group 1 were assessed offline and the diagnosis of LA thrombi was made semi-quantitatively: 1= thrombus present; 2=inconclusive result; 3=no thrombus. The presence of spontaneous echocontrast (SEC) was registered and flow velocity in the LA appendage (LAA-flow) was measured. All patients in whom CV was performed were followed up for 1 year or until relapse of AF. CV related adverse events were defined as any thromboembolic event within 1 week after CV. RESULTS: No serious adverse events occurred during TEE and contrast enhanced imaging. In group 1 atrial thrombi were diagnosed in 14 (15.6%) during native and in 10 (11.1%) patients during contrast enhanced imaging (p<0.001). Of the 10 patients with thrombi in the contrast TEE group, 7 revealed a decreased LAA-flow (≤0,3m/s) and 8 showed moderate or marked SEC. Uncertain results were significantly more common during native imaging than with contrast enhanced TEE (16 vs. 5 patients, p<0.01). Thrombi could definitely be excluded in 60 (66.7%) during conventional and in 75 patients (83.3%) during contrast enhanced TEE (p<0.01). CV was performed subsequently after exclusion of thrombi and at the discretion of the investigator. In group 1, 74 patients (82.2%) were cardioverted and no patient suffered a CV related complication (p=0.084). In group 2, 76 patients (84.4%) underwent CV, of whom 3 suffered a thromboembolic complication after CV (2 strokes, 1 peripheral embolism). CONCLUSION: In patients with AF planned for CV contrast enhancement renders TEE images more interpretable, facilitates the exclusion of atrial thrombi and may reduce the rate of embolic adverse events.