ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: It was the aim of this study to assess the risk of lung cancer in postmenopausal women who received hormone replacement therapy (HRT). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This case-control study involves women who received medical services at Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI) in Buffalo, New York, between 1982 and 1998, and who agreed to complete an epidemiological questionnaire. Participants with missing smoking data were excluded. The case group consisted of 595 women with primary lung cancer. Controls included 1,195 women, randomly selected from a pool of 5,845 eligible individuals, who received medical services at RPCI for non-neoplastic conditions; they had come to RPCI with a suspicion of neoplastic disease, but were diagnosed with neither benign nor malignant conditions. Controls were frequency matched 2:1 to cases on 5-year age intervals and exposure to smoking (ever/never). Cases and controls were comparable for age (means 61.3 and 61.0 years) and ever smoking (90%). RESULTS: There were more former smokers among the cases (67 vs. 59% in controls); cases were less likely to be high school educated, were thinner, and were less likely to report HRT use compared with controls. Overall, hormone use was associated with a significant reduction in risk of lung cancer (adjusted odds ratio = 0.67; 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.85). Stratified analyses showed significant reductions in lung cancer risk in former smokers and women with normal to low body mass index. CONCLUSION: This study supports the hypotheses that there is a protective effect of HRT use on lung cancer risk in women.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/chemically induced , Estrogen Replacement Therapy/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/chemically induced , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Weight , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Obesity/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
In the context of reorganization of production in the sugar and alcohol industry, mechanization of sugar cane harvesting has been justified as a protective measure for the environment and workers. This article focuses on the consequences of organization of work in mechanization of sugar cane harvesting with regard to the harvester operators' health. Based on data gathered through interviews and direct observation at the workplace, changes implemented in the technological base and division of labor and organization were analyzed, identifying the work load inherent to the process and how it affects workers' health. While harvesters help decrease the physical, chemical, and mechanical work load, they increase the physiological and psychological work load. There is evidence of significant change in the pattern of work-related accidents, entailing a decrease in their frequency and increase in severity. The pattern of illness among harvester operators is similar to that of manual sugar cane cutters, with a highlight on psychosomatic illness related to the organization of work in shifts and increased tempo due to use of machinery.