[A rare cause of acute respiratory failure]. / Eine seltene Ursache der akuten respiratorischen Insuffizienz.

This article describes a case report on a rare cause of acute respiratory failure. The patient suffered from a rapidly progressing respiratory insufficiency due to intoxication with a neurotoxin (botulism). A rapid diagnosis proved to be very difficult due to the rarity of the disease itself and the difficulties encountered in the clinical examination caused by early initiation of intubation, artificial ventilation and analgosedation.

Predictors of short-term outcome in brain-injured patients with disorders of consciousness.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate predictors of recovery from the vegetative state (VS) and minimally conscious state (MCS) after brain injury as measured by the widely used Disability Rating Scale (DRS) and to explore differences in rate of recovery and predictors of recovery during inpatient rehabilitation in patients with non-traumatic (NTBI) and traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Longitudinal observational cohort design and retrospective comparison study, in which an initial DRS score was collected at the time of study enrollment. Weekly DRS scores were recorded until discharge from the rehabilitation center for both NTBI and TBI patients. SETTING: Seven acute inpatient rehabilitation facilities in the United States and Europe with specialized programs for VS and MCS patients (the Consciousness Consortium). PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-nine patients with a non-traumatic (N=50) and a traumatic (N=119) brain injury who were in the VS or MCS states. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: DRS score at 13 weeks after injury; change in DRS score over 6 weeks post-admission; and time until commands were first followed (for patients who did not show command-following at or within 2 weeks of admission). RESULTS: Both time between injury and enrollment and DRS score at enrollment were significant predictors of DRS score at week 13 post-injury but the main effect of etiology only approached significance. Etiology was however a significant predictor of the amount of recovery observed over the 6 weeks following enrollment. Time between injury and enrollment was also a good predictor of this outcome, but not DRS score at enrollment. For the time until commands were first followed, patients with better DRS scores at enrollment, and those with faster early rates of change recovered command following sooner than those with worse DRS scores or slower initial rates of change. The etiology was not a significant predictor for this last outcome. None of these predictive models explained sufficient variance to allow their use in individual clinical decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Time post-injury and DRS score at enrollment are predictors of early recovery among patients with disorders of consciousness, depending on the outcome measure chosen. Etiology was also a significant predictor in some analyses, with traumatically injured patients recovering more than those with non-traumatic injuries. However, the hypothesized interaction between etiology and time post-injury did not reach significance in any of the analyses suggesting that, within the time frame studied, the decline in prognosis with the passage of time was similar in the two groups.

Radioimmunoguided surgery using indium-111 capromab pendetide (PROSTASCINT) to diagnose supraclavicular metastasis from prostate cancer.

A 59-year-old man presented with a Gleason score of 4 + 4 = 8 prostate cancer and with multiple bilateral pelvic nodes involved at open pelvic lymph node dissection. On indium-111 capromab pendetide (ProstaScint) scan, there was increased tracer deposition in the prostate, the mesenteric nodes, the right pulmonary hilum, and the left supraclavicular fossa. The ProstaScint injection was repeated, and the gamma probe was used to localize tissue that accumulated radiotracer. Two nodes were excised, one that exhibited increased uptake and one that did not. The radioactive lymph node contained metastatic prostate cancer. No malignancy was found in the second node.

The diagnostic value of optic disc evaluation in acute elevated intracranial pressure.

PURPOSE: Ophthalmologists often are asked to evaluate the optic disc for evidence of acute increased intracranial pressure (ICP). The authors studied the incidence of papilledema in a population of patients with a documented acute increase in ICP. METHODS: Included in this study were 37 patients with acute elevated ICP due to a spontaneous hemorrhage or craniocerebral trauma. In all patients, the ICP was monitored continuously. Fundus examination was performed twice daily on at least 7 consecutive days. RESULTS: According to the level and duration of the ICP, the patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 included 13 patients who had a slightly elevated ICP (range, 20-30 mmHg) on at least 3 consecutive days. In this group, 3 of 13 patients demonstrated venous congestion on the fifth or sixth day. No swelling of the optic disc was seen in this group. Group 2 included seven patients with an elevated ICP, with values ranging from 30 to 70 mmHg lasting for at least 3 consecutive days. In this group, one patient had a blurred disc margin on the sixth day. Group 3 included 17 patients with shortlasting ICP values, ranging from 30 to 60 mmHg for less than 72 hour. Neither papilledema nor abnormalities of fundus vessels were seen in this group. CONCLUSION: Papilledema in acute elevation of ICP is an uncommon event. Its absence does not preclude the presence of ICP elevation.

[Combined "3-in-1"/sciatic nerve block. Block effectiveness, serum level and side effects using 700 mg mepivacaine 1% without and with adrenaline and prilocaine 1%]. / Die kombinierte "3-in-1"/Ischiadicus-Blockade. Blockadeerfolg, Serumspiegel und Nebenwirkungen bei Einsatz von je 700 mg Mepivacain 1% ohne und mit Adrenalin sowie Prilocain 1%.

UNLABELLED: A high dose of local anaesthetic is necessary for the combined "3-in-1"/sciatic nerve block. Prilocaine is recommended for its low toxicity. However, in some patients prilocaine results in pronounced methaemoglobin formation due to toludine. Little has been known hitherto about the use of high-dose mepivacaine for the combined 3-1/sciatic nerve block. This study was undertaken to compare the use of 700 mg mepivacaine 1% and of 700 mg prilocaine 1%. METHODS: The study was approved by the ethics committee of our hospital. Once their informed consent had been obtained in writing 3 x 20 patients (ASA 1-2) undergoing planned surgery on the foot or ankle joint were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized to the following three groups on a double-blind basis: group 1,700 mg mepivacaine without epinephrine; group 2,700 mg mepivacaine with 0.2 mg epinephrine (1:350,000); group 3,700 mg prilocaine 1%. Arterial blood samples for determination of local anaesthetic serum levels were collected over a 120-min period. We determined methaemoglobin and oxygen saturation before and 120 min after the blockade and continued these measurements for 6 h in group 3. At 15-min intervals, all patients were questioned about early signs of toxicity. The perioperative monitoring including blood pressure, ECG and pulse oximetry. Data were analysed using ANOVA and Student's t-test, P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The blocking efficacy did not differ among the groups (groups 1, 2, 3:90%, 95%, 90%). The maximum mepivacaine serum level in group 1 was 3.91 micrograms/ml +/- 0.95 and 2.94 micrograms/ml +/- 0.58 in group 2 (Fig. 2). Over the entire observation period the addition of epinephrine resulted in a significant reduction of the serum level (between 60.3% at t = 15 min and 19.7% at t = 120 min). In the prilocaine group the maximum serum level was 2.07 micrograms/ml +/- 0.56, significantly less than in either mepivacaine group. No patient showed signs or symptoms of local anaesthetic toxicity. In the prilocaine group there was wide variation in methaemoglobin formation among the patient, with a median of 10.1% (Fig. 3, Table 3). Three patients showed a maximum methaemoglobinemia between 16% and 17%. Five patients were still cyanotic after 6 h when they were transferred to the ward. The fractional SaO2 values amounted to 88% (median) with a minimum of 80.3%. CONCLUSION: Both mepivacaine 1% and prilocaine 1% are appropriate local anaesthetics for the combined 3-in-1/sciatic nerve block at a dose of 700 mg. There was no difference in the blocking efficacy. No patient showed clinical signs or symptoms of a local anaesthetic toxicity. Following prilocaine we are sometimes faced with high methaemoglobinemia, which may necessitate prolonged monitoring.

[Axillary blockade of the brachial plexus. A prospective study of blockade success using electric nerve stimulation]. / Die axilläre Blockade des Plexus brachialis. Eine prospektive Untersuchung zum Blockadeerfolg mittels elektrischer Nervenstimulation.

Axillary block is a common anesthetic technique for operations on the hand and forearm. In our hospital, with many trainees in anaesthesia, only 250-300 axillary blocks per year are performed by about 30 colleagues. This implies a small number of blocks for each anaesthetist. The present study was designed to assess whether it is possible to teach this technique and use it with an adequate degree of success under these conditions. We used a nerve stimulator and studied whether the success of the block under these conditions is independent of anaesthetist's experience in this technique. Furthermore, we examined other factors involved in the success of the block. METHODS. The study included 112 patients subjected to elective surgery of the upper extremity; all received an axillary block. We used a nerve stimulator and injected mepivacaine 1% without adrenaline. The following parameters were recorded: the number of blocks to date performed by the anaesthetist; the minimal current required for nerve stimulation; the dose of local anaesthetic; the time between the end of injection and the beginning of surgery; the quality of sensory and motor blockade after 10, 20, and 30 min. Sensory blockade was assessed by the pinprick method (no blockade, analgesia, anaesthesia); motor blockade was judged by comparing the muscle strength of both arms (no blockade, paresis, paralysis). Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS. Of the 112 blocks, 95 (85%) were successful; 17 (15%) failed and the patients required general anaesthesia. Eight of the successful blocks showed a decrease in analgesic quality after > or = 70 min and required additional analgesics or general anaesthesia. We found no correlation between the experience of the anaesthetist and the success of the block. The minimal required current for nerve stimulation in the success group was 0.4 mA and differed significantly from the value of 0.6 mA in the failure group (Table 3). The dose of mepivacaine was higher in the success group (5.9 vs. 5.3 mg/kg). Complete sensory blockade was more frequently achieved for the median, ulnar, and radial nerves than for the musculocutaneus and cutaneous brachii medialis (Fig. 3). The frequency of complete sensory blockade (anaesthesia) had increased by 21.9% between the 20th and 30th min. Complete motor blockade was less often achieved than sensory blockade (Fig. 4). CONCLUSIONS. Using the method of electrostimulation, the axillary block is an appropriate anaesthetic technique that can be applied in a hospital where each anaesthetist only occasionally performs it. Prior to injection of the local anaesthetic, the current for nerve stimulation should be reduced to < 0.5 mA. The time between the end of injection and the beginning of surgery should be no less than 30 min because complete sensory blockade can more often be achieved. The dose of mepivacaine should be no less than 6 mg/kg body weight.

[A comparison of different endotracheal tubes. Tracheal cuff seal, peak centering and the incidence of postoperative sore throat]. / Vergleich verschiedener Endotrachealtuben. Trachealabdichtung, Spitzenzentrierung und Inzidenz postoperativer Halsbeschwerden.

UNLABELLED: The study objective was to evaluate cuff seal, tube tip position and incidence of postoperative sore throat in three different endotracheal tubes: the reusable Rüsch "red rubber" tube (low-volume, high-pressure cuff) and the disposable Rüsch "Super Safety Clear" and Mallinckrodt "lo-pro" tubes (both high-volume, low-pressure cuffs). METHODS: In a prospective randomized trial, 150 consecutive patients scheduled for minor orthopaedic surgery under standardized general anaesthesia, including standardized cuff pressure control, were allocated to one of the three types of endotracheal tube. Leakage and intratracheal tube tip position were investigated by means of fiberoptic tracheoscopy via the endotracheal tube, preceded by pharyngeal instillation of indigocarmine. The semi-standardized interviews for the recording of postoperative sore throat were performed once a day under double-blind conditions from the day of operation to postoperative day 3. Statistical independence testing was based on the chi 2-test, significance was assumed at P < 0.05. MAIN RESULTS: A past-cuff leakage of the pharyngeally instilled dye was found in three patients with "red rubber" tubes. In all of these cases the tracheal cross section deviated markedly from circular. The tips of the "Super Safety Clear" tubes tended to be better centred (P = 0.099). Bad tip position, however, had little influence on postoperative throat complaints (P = 0.394). The differences in incidence of postoperative throat complaints between the "red rubber" (48.9%), "Super Safety Clear" (35.6%) and "lo-pro" tubes (34.1%) did not reach the 5% level (P = 0.288). Such complaints, however, were significantly more frequent in females and in obese patients who exceeded their Broca weights by more than 25%. By contrast, postoperative throat complaints did not vary statistically significantly by age group, tracheal cross-sectional shape, use of atropine or duration of intubation. CONCLUSION: Despite the economic (usable up to 100 times) and ecological (less PVC waste) advantages of the rubber tube, the disposable tubes with high-volume, low-pressure cuffs tended to be superior regarding cuff seal, tube tip position and incidence of postoperative throat complaints. Nevertheless, the continued use of "red rubber" type reusable tubes may be justified in cases where the tube has to stay in place for only a short time.

[Patient-controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia using bupivacaine or morphine following major abdominal surgery. No difference in postoperative morbidity]. / Patientenkontrollierte Analgesie versus Epiduralanalgesie mit Bupivacain oder Morphin nach grossen abdominellen Eingriffen. Kein Unterschied in der postoperativen Morbidität.

In 1987, Yeager et al. reported that intraoperative epidural anesthesia with local anesthetics and postoperative epidural analgesia with opiates diminished postoperative morbidity. In our first clinical trial on this topic, the better postoperative analgesia with epidural bupivacaine-fentanyl failed to improve the outcome after major abdominal operations over that obtained with parenteral piritramide. This randomized controlled investigation was designed to assess whether intraoperative epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine plus light general anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia with morphine would diminish the overall rate of postoperative complications after major abdominal operations compared with general anesthesia (without epidural) followed by patient controlled analgesia with morphine, and with intraoperative epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine and light general anesthesia followed by postoperative bupivacaine-morphine analgesia. METHODS. A total of 292 patients undergoing infrarenal aortic bypass operation, gastric resection, gastrectomy, duodenum-preserving pancreatic resection, Whipple's operation or cystectomy and neobladder formation were randomly divided into three groups: 1. PCA group (patient controlled analgesia, n = 107): patients were operated on under general anesthesia (midazolam, fentanyl, N2O/O2, if necessary with addition of halothane, enflurane or isoflurane; muscle relaxation with pancuronium bromide). Postoperative management consisted in patient-controlled analgesia with morphine (Prominject), bolus 2 mg, lock-out 5 min (recovery room, intensive care unit) or 15 min (surgical ward). 2. EBM group (epidural bupivacaine+morphine, n = 95): operation under light general anesthesia (midazolam, low-dose fentanyl, N2O/O2, pancuronium bromide). In addition, a mixture of bupivacaine (0.25%) and morphine (60 micrograms/ml) was infused (approximately 0.1 ml/kg.h) via an epidural catheter during and after the operation (approximately 72 h). 3. EM group (epidural morphine, n = 90): operation under the same kind of general-epidural anesthesia as in the EBM group. Postoperatively, epidural injection of morphine (0.05 mg/kg in 10 ml of saline) on request up to the 3rd postoperative day. Quality of analgesia (at rest and when patients coughed vigorously), strength of cough, and rate-pressure product were recorded at 8:00 h, 12:00 noon, 16:00 h and 20:00 h on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd postoperative days. Incidence and intensity of all postoperative complications (cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal and other organ failure, reoperations, major infection, sepsis, thromboembolism, metabolic and mental disturbances) were assessed from the day of operation until discharge or death (n = 10), respectively. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. In the PCA and EM groups analgesia was equal but of slightly inferior quality compared with the EBM group. The ability to cough was best in the EBM group and significantly worse in the PCA and EM groups, with no difference between the last two. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)