Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Vet Parasitol ; 159(3-4): 345-9, 2009 Feb 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19070966

ABSTRACT

In this paper we evaluate serology as a tool to monitor Trichinella-free pig herds. Indoor, industrial-raised fattening pigs in the Netherlands are practically Trichinella-free, and were used as a negative reference cohort. A positive cohort was not available but we used sera from an endemic region in Argentina to model a plausible distribution of serological responses (as OD levels) in positive sera, employing the difference between the endemic sera and the negative Dutch sera. We describe a method for correcting for variation among ELISA plates using on-plate reference sera, and demonstrate how to apply these corrections to a collection of test sera from pig farms. The positive and negative reference distributions can be used to estimate fractions true and false positives, necessary for defining appropriate cutoffs to be used for classifying positive and negative animals. Based on this analysis, the serological test was shown to lack the predictive power required for its large scale deployment. The properties of the serological test were also compared to the conventional digestion assay, which is highly specific but considerably less sensitive.


Subject(s)
Serologic Tests/veterinary , Swine Diseases/parasitology , Trichinella/immunology , Trichinellosis/veterinary , Animals , Antibodies, Helminth , Argentina/epidemiology , Endemic Diseases/veterinary , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Prevalence , Sensitivity and Specificity , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Swine , Swine Diseases/blood , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Trichinellosis/epidemiology
2.
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd ; 132(12): 476-9, 2007 Jun 15.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17626577

ABSTRACT

We studied the costs of the veterinarian and physical work load for the farmer of anaesthetizing piglets before surgical castration compared with castration without anaesthesia on seven organic pig farms . Based on experiences from farmers and veterinarians in Norway a protocol 'Castration with anaesthesia' was formulated. This protocol was tested on the Experimental Farm at Raalte and then applied on six organic pig farms. By means of video recording it was measured how much time it takes to castrate and anaesthetize the piglets. The veterinarian anaesthetized the piglets with lidocaine. The work load for the farmer was measured by scoring the physical load for the back and the upper limbs. It took 142 and 81 seconds per litter, respectively, to castrate and anaesthetize the piglets. The waiting time between anaesthesia and castration varied from 10 to 20 minutes on the six farms. Based on these measurements, it was calculated that the costs of the veterinarian (excluding call out fee) of anaesthetizing piglets are Euro 1.73 per litter with five boars. The costs of lidocaine are Euro 0.25 per litter with five boars. The costs per kg organic pig meat are Euro 0.012. The farmers and their veterinarians were asked to react on some theses. They all agreed that the pig farmer should perform the anaesthesia with lidocaine. Anaesthetizing piglets before castration did not affect the physical load for the back and the upper limbs of the pig farmer.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Local/veterinary , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Animal Husbandry , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Orchiectomy/veterinary , Swine/surgery , Anesthesia, Local/economics , Anesthesia, Local/methods , Animal Husbandry/economics , Animal Husbandry/methods , Animals , Male , Norway , Orchiectomy/economics , Orchiectomy/methods , Swine/physiology , Time Factors
3.
Vet Res Commun ; 29(5): 407-14, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16195935

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in suckling piglets, weaners, fattening pigs and sows was studied from November 2001 to October 2002 on 16 free-range farms (FRF), 11 organic farms (OF) and 9 conventional farms (CF) by means of faecal examinations of composite samples. Each farm was visited four times with a 3-month interval. Infections with coccidia were found on 43.8% of the FRF, 90.9% of the OF and 66.7% of the CF. Sows had the highest prevalence, particularly on FRF (87.5%) and OF (80%). Ascaris suum was present on 50% of the FRF, 72.7% of the OF and 11.1% of the CF, whereas fattening pigs on FRF (42.9%) and OF (54.5%) had the highest prevalence. Oesophagostomum spp. were observed on 25% of the FRF, 27.2% of the OF and 22.2% of the CF. The infection was most prevalent in the sows on all farm types: 37.5% on FRF, 30% on OF and 22.2% on CF.Trichuris suis was found on 37.5% of the FRF, 36.4% of the OF and 11.1% of the CF. Again, this infection was most prevalent in the sows, particularly on the FRF (50%) and OF (30%). No other gastrointestinal parasite species were found and no clinical signs were observed. No seasonal trends could be distinguished. In many cases, when an age group on a farm was positive for a certain parasite, it remained so during the whole study. This indicates that this parasite was really 'endemic' on that farm. The results of this study demonstrate that the prevalence of helminth infections of pigs on farms with outdoor facilities is higher than in pigs on conventional farms.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry , Gastrointestinal Diseases/veterinary , Helminthiasis, Animal/epidemiology , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Animals , Gastrointestinal Diseases/parasitology , Netherlands/epidemiology , Seasons , Swine , Swine Diseases/parasitology
4.
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd ; 129(8): 252-60, 2004 Apr 15.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15124285

ABSTRACT

Veterinarians specializing in pig health care responded to a questionnaire regarding their experiences with vaccinations. The goal of the questionnaire was to gain insight into a) the reasons for vaccination and b) the factors involved in the efficacy of vaccination. The results indicated that vaccinations were typically initiated because of health problems at the farm. Veterinarians worked together with farmers and other concerned parties to initiate vaccinations. Respondents predicted that the number of vaccinations would decrease substantially with optimal farm management, but would increase if farmers were allowed (under strict conditions) to vaccinate their own pigs. The results further indicated that the nature of financial compensation predicted the rate of vaccination. Veterinarians paid according to a fixed 'fee for service' system vaccinated less frequently than did veterinarians who were paid according to an ongoing farm management contract. In conclusion, veterinarians appear to be restricted in their capacity to disseminate their experience and knowledge due to the competing needs of the farming network (animals, farmers, retailers).


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry/methods , Swine Diseases/prevention & control , Vaccination/veterinary , Veterinarians , Animal Husbandry/economics , Animals , Female , Humans , Male , Netherlands , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Swine , Vaccination/economics , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Veterinarians/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...