Does stress affect the joints? Daily stressors, stress vulnerability, immune and HPA axis activity, and short-term disease and symptom fluctuations in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Both stressors and stress vulnerability factors together with immune and hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity components have been considered to contribute to disease fluctuations of chronic inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of the present study was to investigate whether daily stressors and worrying as stress vulnerability factor as well as immune and HPA axis activity markers predict short-term disease activity and symptom fluctuations in patients with RA. METHODS: In a prospective design, daily stressors, worrying, HPA axis (cortisol) and immune system (interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, interferon (IFN)-γ, tumour necrosis factor α) markers, clinical and self-reported disease activity (disease activity score in 28 joints, RA disease activity index), and physical symptoms of pain and fatigue were monitored monthly during 6 months in 80 RA patients. RESULTS: Multilevel modelling indicated that daily stressors predicted increased fatigue in the next month and that worrying predicted increased self-reported disease activity, swollen joint count and pain in the next month. In addition, specific cytokines of IL-1ß and IFN-γ predicted increased fatigue 1 month later. Overall, relationships remained relatively unchanged after controlling for medication use, disease duration and demographic variables. No evidence was found for immune and HPA axis activity markers as mediators of the stress-disease relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Daily stressors and the stress-vulnerability factor worrying predict indicators of the short-term course of RA disease activity and fatigue and pain, while specific cytokines predict short-term fluctuations of fatigue. These stress-related variables and immune markers seem to affect different aspects of disease activity or symptom fluctuations independently in RA.

Modulation of lipoprotein plasma concentrations during long-term anti-TNF therapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Durable blockade of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) suppresses disease activity and its progression. Cardiovascular diseases are 1.5-2-fold more frequent in RA patients than in the general population. Although TNF-alpha has well-established effects on lipid metabolism, the long-term effects of TNF-alpha blockade on lipid pattern are still unclear. In the present study, we investigated the effects of 1-year therapy with anti-TNF on the lipid profile of RA patients. METHODS: Disease activity (DAS28) and plasma lipoproteins concentrations (total, HDL and LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, ApoA, ApoB) were assessed in 55 RA patients and 55 controls. The whole RA group was followed up for 6 months, and 31 of the patients were followed up for 1 year. RESULTS: In RA patients, DAS28 decreased after 2 weeks from the start of therapy (p<0.001) and remained low during the entire study duration. Short-term effects of anti-TNF on plasma lipid concentrations seemed beneficial and anti-atherogenic. However, these changes did not persist: plasma concentrations of total and LDL-cholesterol and the atherogenic index increased after 6 months and 1 year from the start of therapy. During therapy, the changes in disease activity and inflammatory status were inversely correlated with changes in plasma total and HDL cholesterol levels and positively correlated with the variation of atherogenic index. CONCLUSION: We conclude that one-year therapy with infliximab is likely to lead to a more pro-atherogenic pattern of the plasma lipids concentrations. However, the overall impact of these changes on the cardiovascular risk is more complex, considering the strong anti-inflammatory effects of anti-TNF drugs.

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor polymorphisms do not predict therapeutic response to glucocorticoids or to tumour necrosis factor alpha-neutralising treatments in rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is an inflammatory mediator associated with RA severity. In various diseases, MIF polymorphisms are associated with clinical response glucocorticoid (GC) treatment. It is unclear whether MIF polymorphisms determine GC response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to other RA treatments. Therefore, the question of whether two functional variants in MIF are associated with the response to tumour necrosis factor (TNF)alpha-neutralising and GC treatments in RA was investigated. METHODS: Data from two cohorts of an RA registry were used. For patients who started with TNFalpha-neutralising (infliximab) or GC treatment, courses with a duration of at least 3 months were included and response to TNFalpha blockers or GC was calculated according to the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria. MIF -173G-->C genotyping was achieved using an assay-on-demand allelic discrimination assay, and alleles of the CATT repeat element were identified using a fluorescently labelled PCR primer and capillary electrophoresis. Logistic-regression modelling was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: In total, 192 courses of oral prednisone or methylprednisolone injections in 98 patients with RA and 90 patients with RA who were on TNFalpha-neutralising treatments were documented. In all, 27% of the patients with RA were found to be heterozygous for seven CATT repeats (CATT(7)) and 31% were heterozygous for -173C. Respectively, 4% and 6% of the patients with RA were homozygous for the MIF CATT(7) repeat or the MIF -173C allele. Carrier status and homozygosity for CATT(7 )repeat and the MIF -173C allele were not associated with response to GC (odds ratios (ORs) close to 1) or to TNFalpha-neutralising treatment (ORs close to 2). CONCLUSION: The MIF-CATT(7) repeat and the MIF-173G-->C functional variant are not strongly associated with a decreased clinical response to TNFalpha-neutralising or GC treatment in RA.