ABSTRACT
Objective. A 'Virtual resection' consists of computationally simulating the effect of an actual resection on the brain. We validated two functional connectivity based virtual resection methods with the actual connectivity measured using post-resection intraoperative recordings.Approach. A non-linear association index was applied to pre-resection recordings from 11 extra-temporal focal epilepsy patients. We computed two virtual resection strategies: first, a 'naive' one obtained by simply removing from the connectivity matrix the electrodes that were resected; second, a virtual resection with partialization accounting for the influence of resected electrodes on not-resected electrodes. We validated the virtual resections with two analysis: (1) we tested with a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test if the distributions of connectivity values after the virtual resections differed from the actual post-resection connectivity distribution; (2) we tested if the overall effect of the resection measured by contrasting pre-resection and post-resection connectivity values is detectable with the virtual resection approach using a Kolmogorv-Smirnov test.Main results. The estimation of post-resection connectivity values did not succeed for both methods. In the second analysis, the naive method failed completely to detect the effect found between pre-resection and post-resection connectivity distributions, while the partialization method agreed with post-resection measurements in detecting a drop connectivity compared to pre-resection recordings. Our findings suggest that the partialization technique is superior to the naive method in detecting the overall effect after the resection.Significance. We pointed out how a realistic validation based on actual post-resection recordings reveals that virtual resection methods are not yet mature to inform the clinical decision-making.
