Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
1.
Diabetes Care ; 46(8): 1477-1482, 2023 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37276529

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of type 1 diabetes (T1D) before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and determine whether severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is associated with T1D development. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: All Danish residents aged <30 years free of diabetes from 2015 to 2021 were included. Individuals were followed from 1 January 2015 or birth until the development of T1D, the age of 30, the end of the study (31 December 2021), emigration, development of type 2 diabetes, onset of any cancer, initiation of immunomodulating therapy, or development of any autoimmune disease. We compared the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of T1D using Poisson regression models. We matched each person with a SARS-CoV-2 infection with three control individuals and used a cause-specific Cox regression model to estimate the hazard ratio (HR). RESULTS: Among 2,381,348 individuals, 3,579 cases of T1D occurred. The adjusted IRRs for T1D in each quarter of 2020 and 2021 compared with 2015-2019 were as follows: January-March 2020, 1.03 (95% CI 0.86; 1.23); January-March 2021, 1.01 (0.84; 1.22), April-June 2020, 0.98 (0.80; 1.20); April-June 2021, 1.34 (1.12; 1.61); July-September 2020, 1.13 (0.94; 1.35); July-September 2021, 1.21 (1.01; 1.45); October-December 2020, 1.09 (0.91; 1.31); and October-December 2021, 1.18 (0.99; 1.41). We identified 338,670 individuals with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result and matched them with 1,004,688 control individuals. A SARS-2-CoV infection was not significantly associated with the risk of T1D development (HR 0.90 [95% CI 0.60; 1.35]). CONCLUSIONS: There was an increase in T1D incidence during April-June 2021 compared with April-June 2015-2019, but this could not be attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Denmark/epidemiology
2.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 180(32)2018 Aug 06.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30070630

ABSTRACT

This review discusses two methods of monitoring the effect of anti-osteoporotic treatment: bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTMs). Both monitoring strategies are to some extent able to predict the treatment-induced change in risk of fracture. The use of BMD is commonplace, and clinicians are experienced in the interpretation of data. The use and knowledge of BTMs among clinicians is limited, but it allows for early testing while being practical and cheap. Further knowledge and implementation of BTMs in the clinical practice may improve the monitoring capabilities.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/blood , Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Drug Monitoring/methods , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Bone Density/physiology , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Remodeling/physiology , Collagen Type I/blood , Humans , Medication Adherence , Osteoporosis/metabolism , Osteoporotic Fractures/metabolism , Peptide Fragments/blood , Peptides/blood , Procollagen/blood , Risk Assessment
3.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 179(2)2017 Jan 09.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28074765

ABSTRACT

In most patients, treatment of osteoporosis is a long-term challenge. Because alendronate and zoledronic acid accumulate in bone with some persistent antifracture efficacy after therapy, it is reasonable to consider a "drug holiday" for low-risk patients. It is recommended that the duration and length of drug holiday should be individualized for each patient. For all other bisphosphonates data are limited. For other antiresorptive and anabolic agents "drug holiday" is not recommended.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Aged , Biomarkers/analysis , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Denosumab/administration & dosage , Denosumab/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Humans , Middle Aged , Precision Medicine , Teriparatide/administration & dosage , Teriparatide/therapeutic use , Thiophenes/administration & dosage , Thiophenes/therapeutic use , Withholding Treatment
4.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 177(50): V05150451, 2015 Dec 07.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26651910

ABSTRACT

Once a fragility fracture has occurred after the age of 50 years, 41-85% of patients will experience another fracture. Patients who present at hospitals with a fragility fracture would benefit from introduction of fracture prevention programmes, as these programmes have been shown to reduce the number of subsequent fractures, reduce mortality, and furthermore are cost-effective. This paper presents the evidence for implementation of fracture prevention programmes and how these can be introduced successfully.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone/prevention & control , Secondary Prevention/methods , Denmark , Fractures, Bone/economics , Humans , Osteoporotic Fractures/economics , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Secondary Prevention/economics
5.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 177(36)2015 Aug 31.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26324291

ABSTRACT

One in five men over the age of 50 years will suffer an osteoporotic fracture during their lifetime, and men who sustain fractures have an increased mortality risk compared to women. Three bisphosphonates (alendronate, risedronate and zolendronic acid), denosumab, strontium ranelate and teriparatide are currently approved in Denmark for the treatment of osteoporosis in men. This review summarizes the available therapeutic options.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Aged , Bone Density/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control
7.
J Bone Miner Res ; 28(3): 455-63, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23044864

ABSTRACT

Ocular inflammatory reactions have been described in patients on bisphosphonate treatment. We estimated the incidence rate of ocular inflammation at 3 and 12 months in patients treated for osteoporosis using a register-based cohort linked to prescription data (hospitals and private practice) and hospital data. From January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2007, a total of 88,202 patients beginning osteoporosis therapy were identified. Of those patients, 82,404 (93%) began oral bisphosphonates and 5798 (7%) nonbisphosphonates. Within the first year of treatment, 4769 (5.4%) of patients on osteoporosis therapy filled one or more prescriptions for topical eye steroids (TES). TES treatment rates (per 1000 patient-years) in the first year of osteoporosis treatment were 44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 42 to 46) for alendronate, 40 (95% CI 38 to 43) for etidronate, 45 (95% CI 35 to 57) for risedronate, 32 (95% CI 27 to 37) for raloxifene, and 64 (95% CI 49 to 83) for strontium ranelate. After adjustment for age, Charlson index, and the number of comedications, pulmonary disease in men was associated with an increased use of TES (odds ratio [OR] = 1.48; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.86; p = 0.001). In women, malignant disease (OR = 1.27; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.60; p = 0.04) and pulmonary disease (OR = 1.32; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.62; p = 0.01) were significant predictors at 3 months and rheumatic diseases at 12 months (OR = 1.20; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.31; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the different drug classes (bisphosphonates versus nonbisphosphonates, alendronate versus nonalendronate-bisphosphonates) for risk of ocular inflammation, with age and the number of comedications being the only significant predictors. Hospital-treated uveitis (48 patients, or 0.05%) showed a similar trend. In conclusion, after initiation of treatment for osteoporosis, the risk of inflammatory eye reactions requiring TES is relatively low and not significantly different between bisphosphonate and nonbisphosphonate users. Patients with a rheumatic or pulmonary disease are at increased risk.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Databases, Factual , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Drug Prescriptions , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Cohort Studies , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male
9.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 174(47): 2926-30, 2012 Nov 19.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23171789

ABSTRACT

Both chronic kidney disease and osteoporosis are frequent conditions in the general population. Most drugs for treating osteoporosis seem safe in terms of affecting renal function for patients with mildly to moderate decreased renal function. There are very few data on the efficacy (reduction in fracture risk) or safety in patients with severely decreased renal function (glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min) or on dialysis.


Subject(s)
Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Renal Insufficiency/complications , Aged , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacokinetics , Calcium/metabolism , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/pharmacokinetics , Female , Fractures, Spontaneous/diagnostic imaging , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Kidney Failure, Chronic/metabolism , Metabolic Clearance Rate , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporosis/metabolism , Osteoporotic Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Parathyroid Hormone/administration & dosage , Parathyroid Hormone/adverse effects , Parathyroid Hormone/pharmacokinetics , RANK Ligand/administration & dosage , RANK Ligand/adverse effects , RANK Ligand/pharmacokinetics , Radiography , Renal Dialysis , Renal Insufficiency/metabolism , Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators/administration & dosage , Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators/adverse effects , Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators/pharmacokinetics , Strontium/administration & dosage , Strontium/adverse effects , Strontium/pharmacokinetics
10.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 174(47): 2931-4, 2012 Nov 19.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23171790
11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22645516

ABSTRACT

Vitamin D status in pregnant women has been linked to childhood bone mineral density in their offspring but it is unclear if effects extend to fracture risk in adulthood or even old age. As vitamin D levels in the population show pronounced seasonal variation in Denmark, we performed an epidemiological analysis of hip fracture rates as a function of season of birth, age, and sex. We retrieved information on all hip fractures in the 9-year period between 1997 and 2005 in all men and women aged 65-95, excluded hip fractures that occurred in current and recent prednisolone users, and subsequently calculated fracture rates and relative risks. The analysis covered 541,109 men and 691,522 women. In women, we observed a small but statistically significant difference between fracture rates by season of birth for all age intervals expect the youngest (age 65-69). A similar pattern was seen in men, but this was only statistically significant in the two oldest age groups (age 85-89 and 90-95). These findings suggest that vitamin D availability in the first and second trimester of intrauterine life could have a small but lasting impact on bone health and the risk of osteoporotic fractures. Further studies are needed.

14.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 172(9): 700-4, 2010 Mar 01.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20199747

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis is a major cause of low-energy hip fractures. Although there are pharmacologic agents available for both prevention and treatment, less than 10% of hip fracture cases initiate anti-osteoporotic treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 1995 and 2008, questionnaires were sent to all Danish orthopaedic surgery departments treating patients with low-energy hip fractures, asking them to explain a) whether patients with osteoporosis are identified, b) whether the patients identified are treated for osteoporosis, and c) whether physicians need more information about osteoporosis. RESULTS: 56 departments (97%) returned the questionnaires in 1995 and 25 (95%) in 2008. 40% of the departments did (12% in 1995) refer any patients with low-energy fractures to bone densitometry. 84% treated (11% in 1995) patients with hip fractures with calcium and D vitamin. In 2008, 28% (0% in 1995) of the departments used bisfosfonates after hip fractures (none used yearly zoledronate). More than 80% (54% in 1995) of the departments informed the patients about in the advantages of lifestyle changes. Half of the departments' doctors wanted more information about osteoporosis in 1995 compared with only 16% in 2008. In 2008, 48% of the departments informed the GPs that their patient with a low-energy fracture may have osteoporosis and that further evaluation and treatment may be needed. CONCLUSION: Medical treatment after fractures was more widespread in 2008 than in 1995. About half of the Danish departments with orthopaedic surgery functions refer patients to further investigation. There is, however, still room for improvement.


Subject(s)
Hip Fractures/etiology , Osteoporosis/complications , Aged , Bone Density , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Fractures, Spontaneous/etiology , Hip Fractures/diagnosis , Hip Fractures/therapy , Humans , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Life Style , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis/diagnosis , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Zoledronic Acid
17.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 170(4): 227-30, 2008 Jan 21.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18282452

ABSTRACT

Decreased renal function and osteoporosis are both frequent conditions in the general population. Most drugs for treating osteoporosis seem safe for patients with mildly decreased renal function (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] 60-90 ml/min). In patients with a moderately decreased GFR of 30-60 ml/min, there are very few studies with BMD as endpoint. Most drugs seem safe in terms of affecting renal function. The aim should be to control calcium and vitamin D metabolism in patients with severely decreased renal function (GFR<30 ml/min) or on dialysis.


Subject(s)
Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Renal Insufficiency/drug therapy , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Calcium/metabolism , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Female , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Kidney Failure, Chronic/drug therapy , Kidney Failure, Chronic/metabolism , Male , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporosis/prevention & control , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/complications , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/prevention & control , Renal Dialysis , Renal Insufficiency/complications , Renal Insufficiency/metabolism , Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators/administration & dosage , Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators/adverse effects , Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators/therapeutic use , Vitamin D/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...