ABSTRACT
Breast shielding can reduce dose to the female breast, a radiosensitive organ receiving significant radiation during computed tomography (CT) chest examinations, particularly in cardiac CT, where Electrocardiogram dose modulation currently precludes the use of radial dose modulation to reduce breast dose. However, breast shields may produce artefacts affecting interpretation of coronary arteries. This study explores the dose savings and the effect of breast shields on image quality with torso and CT dose index body phantoms and an organ dose calculator. Change in dose calculated: 53-63 % (female breast), 82-85 % (lung), 79-84 % (oesophagus) and 76-80 % (effective dose) with larger dose reductions at lower kVp. Image quality is preserved when breast shields are placed after the scout no closer than 10 mm from the skin. Therefore, breast shields can be used in cardiac CT to reduce breast dose without compromising image quality. Revised conversion factors for dose length product to effective dose are suggested for cardiac CT without and with breast shields.
Subject(s)
Breast/radiation effects , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Radiography, Thoracic/standards , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Female , Humans , Relative Biological EffectivenessABSTRACT
This position paper was produced by a working party set up by the Radiology Special Interest Group of the ACPSEM in 2001. It is designed to give the consensus view of College members in Australia and New Zealand on the nature and frequency of tests which should be performed on diagnostic x-ray equipment to maintain adequate quality control of imaging performance and radiation safety. Tests on mammographic equipment have been excluded having been covered in a previous ACPSEM position paper (Australas Phys Eng Sci Med, 24(3):107-131, 2001). Detailed descriptions of test procedures are not given but it is intended that a series of workbooks should be produced giving College recommended test methods for each imaging modality. The recommendations are produced here in an easy-to-read, tabular form giving the nature and purpose of each test and the implications of non-compliance with regard to image quality and radiation safety.
Subject(s)
Equipment Failure Analysis/methods , Equipment Failure Analysis/standards , Guidelines as Topic , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Radiography/instrumentation , Radiography/methods , Australasia , Guideline AdherenceABSTRACT
Guidance levels for radiation doses in diagnostic radiology for average size patients have been developed for use in the state of Victoria. The guidance levels were determined from the results of surveys of patients in hospitals and private radiology centres in Victoria. Guidance levels have been developed for the following procedures: neonate chest AP; several plain film paediatric procedures; several plain film adult procedures; fluoroscopy equipment; and CT procedures. The guidance levels are compared with those recommended in other countries.
Subject(s)
Radiography , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Radiation Dosage , VictoriaABSTRACT
Image quality and dose parameters have been measured on most makes and models of CT scanners in Victoria. Image quality was assessed using a dose efficiency and imaging performance parameter (Q-value). Factors relating to patient dose were measured. Patient doses using CTDIw in mGy were determined for average size patients for the abdomen procedure. Guidance levels have been recommended for CT procedures in Victoria.
Subject(s)
Radiation Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Data Collection , Humans , Radiography, Abdominal , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/instrumentation , VictoriaABSTRACT
This study examines doses to paediatric patients from diagnostic radiology. Measurements were made at 29 hospitals and private radiology practices in the state of Victoria. Entrance skin doses in air were measured for the exposure factors used by hospital radiology departments and private radiology practices for a standard size 1, 5, 10 and 15 year old child, for the following procedures: chest AP/PA, lat; abdomen AP; pelvis AP; lumbar spine AP, lat; and skull AP, lat. There was a large range of doses for each particular procedure and age group. Factors contributing to the range of doses were identified. Guidance levels for paediatric radiology based on the third quartile value of the skin entrance doses have been recommended and are compared with guidance levels.
Subject(s)
Radiation Dosage , Radiography , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Quality Control , Radiography/standards , Radiometry , Skin/radiation effects , VictoriaABSTRACT
This survey examines doses from PA chest radiography at radiology practices, private hospitals and public hospitals throughout metropolitan and country Victoria. Data were collected from 111 individual X-ray units at 86 different practices. Entrance skin doses in air were measured for exposure factors used by the centre for a 23 cm thick male chest. A CDRH LucA1 chest phantom was used when making these measurements. About half of the centres used grid technique and half used non-grid technique. There was a factor of greater than 10 difference in the entrance dose delivered between the highest dose centre and the lowest dose centre for non-grid centres; and a factor of about 5 for centres using grids. Factors contributing to the high doses recorded at some centres were identified. Guidance levels for chest radiography based on the third quartile value of the entrance doses from this survey have been recommended and compared with guidance levels recommended in other countries.
