Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 14(1): 168, 2019 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31533759

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify the predictor factors of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction following patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) surgical ligation. BACKGROUND: PDA is viewed as a noticeable amongst the most widely recognized congenital heart defects in children and its closure is responsible for many hemodynamic changes that require intervention and care. METHODS: A retrospective study included fifty children with isolated PDA treated by surgical ligation from June 2015 to June 2018. The LV dimensions and systolic function were assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography pre and post PDA ligation. All cases were followed-up on the first-day, 1 month and 6 months post ligation. RESULTS: The mean age of cases was 15.78 ± 7.58 months and 72% were females. The mean duct size was 4.08 ± 1.25 mm. There was a marked decrease in LVEDd, LA/Ao, EF and FS in the first-day post ligation contrasted with pre ligation values. Moreover, an amazing decline in LVEDd and LA/Ao ratio was observed 1 month post ligation contrasted with the early post ligation status with asynchronous improvement of FS and EF at one and 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: PDA ligation is associated with a noteworthy LV systolic dysfunction within the first day post ligation; that in a significant number of patients may require anti-failure measures, prolong the hospital stay and necessitate a regular follow up and monitoring of LV function. PDA size, age, preoperative LVEDd and FS can be considered as predictor factors for suspicion of acute decrease in the LV systolic function early post PDA ligation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinTrial.Gov NCT04018079 .


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Ductus Arteriosus, Patent/surgery , Risk Assessment/methods , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/etiology , Child, Preschool , Echocardiography , Female , Hemodynamics , Humans , Infant , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Systole , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology , Ventricular Function, Left
2.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 32(2): 301-7, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17561410

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Mitral valve repair is the gold standard to restore mitral valve function and is now known to have good long-term outcome. In order to help perioperative decision making, we analyzed our collective to find independent risk factors affecting their outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively studied our first 175 consecutive adult patients (mean age: 64+/-10.4 years; 113 males) who underwent primary mitral valve repair associated with any other cardiac procedures between January 1986 and December 1998. Risk factors influencing reoperations and late survival were plotted in a uni- and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 3.4% (6 deaths, 0-22nd postoperative day (POD)). Late mortality was 9.1% (16 deaths, 3rd-125th POM). Reoperation was required in five patients. Kaplan-Meier actuarial analysis demonstrated a 96+/-1% 1-year survival, 88+/-3% 5-year survival and a 69+/-8% 10-year survival. Freedom from reoperations was 99% at 1 year after repair, 97+/-2% after 5 years and 88+/-6% after 10 years. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that residual NYHA class III and IV (p=0.001, RR 4.55, 95% CI: 1.85-14.29), poor preoperative ejection fraction (p=0.013, RR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02-1.18), functional MR (p=0.018, RR 4.17, 95% CI: 1.32-16.67), and ischemic MR (p=0.049, RR 3.13, 95% CI: 1.01-10.0) were all independent predictors of late death. Persistent mitral regurgitation at seventh POD (p=0.005, RR 4.55, 95% CI: 1.56-20.0), age below 60 (p=0.012, RR 8.7, 95% CI: 2.44-37.8), and absence of prosthetic ring (p=0.034, RR 4.76, 95% CI: 1.79-33.3) were all independent risk factors for reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve repair provides excellent survival. However, long-term outcome can be negatively influenced by perioperative risk factors. Risk of reoperation is higher in younger patients with a residual mitral regurgitation and without ring annuloplasty.


Subject(s)
Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Mitral Valve/surgery , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Mitral Valve/physiopathology , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/mortality , Postoperative Complications , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 22(2): 249-54, 2002 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12142194

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Heart manipulation during OPCAB may cause hemodynamical instability in particular for access to the posterior and lateral walls. The 'no compression' technique involves enucleation of the heart without any compression on the cavities, and stabilization of the target area with a suction device. The impact of this technique on hemodynamics is assessed. METHODS: In order to analyze a homogeneous group, 26 consecutive patients with triple grafts, one to each side of the heart in the same sequential order (posterior, lateral and anterior wall successively) were selected. Heart rate (HR), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP, mmHg), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP, mmHg), mean arterial pressure (MAP, mmHg), cardiac output index (COI, l/min per m(2)), and central venous saturation (SvO(2),%) were monitored. A coronary shunt was used for all the anastomoses. RESULTS: HR was stable with baseline value of 60+/-10 and the highest value for the anterior wall, 63.6+/-8 (P=0.23). PAP and PCWP exhibited their highest increase, when compared with baseline, for the lateral wall, 23.9+/-4.7 vs. 20.7+/-6.2 (P=0.06), and 17.2+/-4.7 vs. 14.9+/-5.6 (P=0.16), respectively. MAP, COI and SvO(2), exhibited their largest drop, when compared with baseline, for the lateral wall too, 73.1+/-9.1 vs. 77.1+/-7.5 (P=0.12), 1.99+/-0.47 vs. 2.26+/-0.55 (P=0.09), and 70.5+/-8.4 vs. 74.8+/-9.3 (P=0.12), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: None of the hemodynamical parameter differed significantly from baseline value for all three territories. While hemodynamics was perfectly maintained during the posterior and anterior walls revascularization, exposure of the lateral wall led to marginal changes only.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass , Hemodynamics/physiology , Aged , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/methods , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Care , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Intraoperative
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...