ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of minor and major ocular injuries in patients with orbital wall fractures at Loma Linda University Health, a level-one trauma center, to help determine the most appropriate setting for the initial dilated fundus examination by ophthalmologists. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed from January 2008 to January 2013 of patients diagnosed with orbital wall fracture secondary to trauma. Exclusion criteria included unknown mechanism of injury, the absence of ophthalmology consultation, or absence of imaging. Data collected included age, gender, mechanism of injury, visual acuity, and anterior/posterior segment findings. Ocular injuries were categorized as either minor or major. RESULTS: Of 567 charts reviewed, 460 met criteria and were included for analysis. In the analysis, 86.5% of patients were male, and 81.3% were Caucasian. The most common mechanism of orbital fracture was blunt injury. Visual acuity was better than 20/100 in 82.4% of patients. On chart review, 81.1% of patients were found to have either a minor injury, a major injury, or both. The most common injury was subconjunctival hemorrhage (53.5%). Globe rupture (2.9%) and vision-threatening posterior segment findings such as retinal tear and choroidal rupture (1.3%) were relatively rare. Only one retinal detachment (0.2%) was found, specifically in the setting of severe injury with concomitant globe rupture. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the common ocular injuries associated with orbital fractures will help emergency department (ED) physicians and ophthalmologists provide the dilated fundus exam in the most appropriate setting. The most frequent injuries identified were non-vision threatening, and visually significant posterior segment findings were relatively rare (1.3%). Thus, for the majority of patients presenting to the ED with orbital fracture, a dilated fundus exam can be performed at a later date in the outpatient clinic setting, unless urgent orbital fracture surgery is planned.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare the amount of pupil dilation produced by a set of commonly used preoperative mydriatic agents for cataract surgery, with the same regimen preceded by topical administration of atropine 1.0%. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA. METHODS: In this prospective unmasked study, the baseline pupil size in eyes of volunteers was measured. Pupil size was then measured 30 minutes after instillation of the institution's standard dilation regimen for cataract surgery, which included phenylephrine 2.5%, tropicamide 1.0%, and cyclopentolate 1.0%. Several days later, the subjects returned for repeat measurements after pretreating the study eye(s) with atropine 1.0% 3 times a day the day previously and once on the morning of repeat dilation and measurements. Pupil size was again measured after administration of the standard regimen. RESULTS: The study included 72 eyes of 54 patients. A paired t test showed a statistically significant difference in mean pupil dilation between the standard regimen alone and the standard regimen with atropine 1.0% pretreatment. The mean pupil dilation was 7.3 mm +/- 1.2 (SD) with the standard regimen alone and 6.9 +/- 1.2 mm with the standard regimen with atropine pretreatment; the difference was statistically significant (P<.001). CONCLUSION: The addition of atropine 1.0% 1 day before administration of a standard preoperative dilating regimen for cataract surgery resulted in a smaller dilated pupil diameter than administration of the standard set of preoperative mydriatic agents alone. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
