Simultaneous Le Fort III and Le Fort I Osteotomy: Surgical Outcomes and Clinical Parameters.

INTRODUCTION: Simultaneous Le Fort III/I (LF III/I) osteotomies are often performed when a differential advancement of the upper and lower midface is needed. This study aims to evaluate midface position preoperative and 1 week postoperative in patients with severe midface hypoplasia. In addition, this study aims to compare the planned surgical movements to the actual postoperative movements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted using cephalometry for patients treated with a simultaneous LF III/I osteotomy at a single institution. Osteotomies were performed during 1980-2018 on skeletally mature patients with a craniofacial syndrome, with clinical and radiographic follow-up available. RESULTS: Twelve patients met the inclusion criteria with a mean age of 20.2±6.4 years. Treatment resulted in statistically significant anterior movements related to Orbitale, anterior nasal spine, A Point, and the upper incisor tip, and inferior movements related to anterior nasal spine, A Point, upper and lower incisor tips, B point, and pogonion. Stability after 1 year showed only statistically significant changes at ANB. The predictable error for planned movements versus actual movements was greater in the vertical plane than the horizontal plane. CONCLUSIONS: A simultaneous LF III/I osteotomy significantly improved the midface position and occlusal relationship in syndromic patients with midface hypoplasia in a predictable manner. Further multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate the conclusions.

The Effects of Nasoalveolar Molding on Nasal Proportions at the Time of Nasal Maturity.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the effect of nasoalveolar molding (NAM) versus no-NAM on nasal morphology in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) at the time of nasal maturity. METHODS: A retrospective, single-institution review was conducted on all non-syndromic patients with UCLP. Inclusion criteria included age 14 years or above, unilateral cleft repair at the time of infancy, and adequate photography taken at nasal maturity and prior to rhinoplasty. Exclusion criteria included age less than 14 years, syndromic diagnosis, and rhinoplasty prior to nasal maturity. Ten parameters were measured twice from standardized clinical photographs using the Dolphin Imaging Software for establishment of intrarater reliability. Subjective analysis was achieved through completion of the Asher McDade grading scale by 3 expert cleft practitioners. RESULTS: Nostril height, columellar angle, alar cant, vertical alar height, alar height angle, nasofacial angle, and nasolabial angle were found to be significantly less severe in patients who had undergone NAM in conjunction with surgical repair when compared with those who had undergone surgical repair alone. Asher McDade grading revealed significant improvement in nasal form, nasal symmetry/deviation, nasal profile, vermillion border, and overall score in patients who underwent NAM compared to no-NAM. CONCLUSION: The use of presurgical NAM during infancy can improve nasal symmetry and nasal proportions at the time of nasal maturity.

Technical Pearls in Frontal and Periorbital Bone Contouring in Gender-Affirmation Surgery.

Changes made to the forehead and periorbital region can have dramatic effects in gender-affirmation surgery. Removal of frontal bossing and alteration of orbital shape can result in significant facial feminization. This elective surgical intervention must be safe, reliable, and aesthetically effective. The described technique of frontal and periorbital bone contouring allows for a safe and consistent surgical outcome in properly selected patients. Nuances in specific technical maneuvers in this operation can have profound effects on safety and aesthetic outcomes. In this article, specific points are detailed in text and video describing the senior author's (E.D.R) surgical approach.

What Is the Burden of Care of Nasoalveolar Molding?

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to evaluate nasoalveolar molding (NAM) in the context of burden of care defined as physical, psychosocial, or financial burden on caregivers. SEARCH METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, 5 databases were searched from inception through December 24, 2019, for keywords and subject headings pertaining to cleft lip and/or palate and NAM. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Clinical studies on NAM with reference to physical (access to care, number of visits, distance traveled), psychosocial (caregiver perceptions, family interactions, breast milk feeding), and financial (direct and indirect costs) burden were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Study selection was performed by 2 independent reviewers. RESULTS: The search identified 1107 articles and 114 articles remained for qualitative synthesis. Burden of care domains were discussed but not measured in 43% of articles and only 25% assessed burden of care through a primary outcome. Of these, 20 articles reported on physical, 8 articles on psychosocial, and 12 articles on financial burden. Quality of evidence is limited by study design and risk of bias. CONCLUSION: Nasoalveolar molding has been indiscriminately associated with burden of care in the literature. Although NAM may not be the ideal treatment option for all patients and families, the physical considerations are limited when accounting for the observed psychosocial advantages. Financial burden appears to be offset, but further research is required. Teams should directly assess the impact of this early intervention on the well-being of caregivers and advance strategies that improve access to care.

Neonatal Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis in Infants With Pierre Robin Sequence.

Pierre Robin sequence is the constellation of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and tongue-based airway obstruction. When airway obstruction is severe, feeding, growth, and respiratory demise are at risk. Neonatal mandibular distraction osteogenesis is a technique which improves tongue-based airway obstruction and avoids tracheostomy in patients with severe expressions of Pierre Robin sequence. Its efficacy in relieving airway obstruction is well documented, and it has become the surgical intervention of choice at many craniofacial centers. However, this is an uncommon procedure which can be performed within the first weeks of life, offering little space for a learning curve. The success of neonatal distraction and avoidance of complications is highly dependent on proper surgical technique. This report provides a brief overview of the disease, details the technique of the senior surgeon with captioned videos, describes the protocol used at our institution and reports long-term outcomes with a case description.

Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis in Pediatric Patients With Craniofacial Differences: Causes, Recurrence and Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The authors present an institutional experience treating congenital and acquired temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis, detailing outcomes and potential risk factors of recurrence. METHODS: Retrospective chart review identified patients with TMJ ankylosis (1976-2019). Clinical records, operative reports, and imaging studies were reviewed for demographics, surgical operations, and ankylosis including maximal interincisal opening (MIO) and re-ankylosis. RESULTS: Forty-four TMJs with bony ankylosis were identified in 28 patients (mean age at any initial mandibular surgery: 3.7; range:0-14 years). Follow-up was 13.7 ±â€Š5.9 years. Sixteen (57.1%) patients had bilateral ankylosis; 27(96.4%) had syndromes. Nine patients had congenital ankylosis, 16 had iatrogenic ankylosis (4.5 ±â€Š3.7 years from initial distraction osteogenesis or autologous mandibular reconstruction) referred from outside institutions in 6 instances, and 3 had post-infectious ankylosis. Patients having their first mandibular operation at a younger age had more frequent reoperations for recurrent TMJ ankylosis, although this did not reach statistical significance. Mean improvement in MIO was 21.4 ±â€Š7.3 mm. Ankylosis recurred in 21 (75%) patients. Five patients with congenital TMJ ankylosis required gastrostomy and remained at least partially dependent. Five patients had tracheostomy at the time of TMJ ankylosis surgery: 2 were eventually decannulated and 3 required repeat tracheostomy after ankylosis recurrence and remained tracheostomy-dependent. CONCLUSION: The clinical course of TMJ ankylosis in children affected by craniofacial differences is complex and typically involves a high rate of recurrence and multiple reoperations despite initial improvement in postoperative MIO. Younger age at initial mandibular surgery and number of operations require further investigation as potential predictors of recurrent TMJ ankylosis as well as tracheostomy and gastrostomy dependence.

Nasal Alar Surface Area Differences After Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair: Long-Term Effects of the Perialar Incision.

BACKGROUND: The Millard rotation-advancement cleft lip repair is the most commonly performed cleft lip repair. An extended perialar incision allows for further advancement of the lateral lip element and improved positioning of the alar base. There is a lack of data evaluating differences in nasal alar growth when the perialar incision is utilized. This study compares the long-term effects of a perialar incision on the alar surface area of unilateral cleft lip patients who underwent a Millard cleft lip repair. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with a diagnosis of unilateral cleft lip treated with a Millard primary lip repair were studied. A perialar incision was utilized in 16 patients while 21 patients underwent a standard Millard repair. 3dMD facial images were taken at least 10 years after the initial lip repair. Using the patient's non-cleft side as an internal control, the Alar Ratio (AR) was calculated, defined as the cleft alar surface area divided by the non-cleft alar surface area. RESULTS: The AR was significantly greater in the standard Millard repair group compared to the perialar incision group, 0.74 and 0.64 respectively (P = .02). The incomplete cleft population demonstrated a more profound difference between the treatment groups (0.82 and 0.62, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals an association between a perialar incision and decreased alar surface area. Long-term follow up results suggest a perialar scar restricts alar growth leading to significant asymmetry between the cleft and non-cleft sides. Therefore, surgical technique must be carefully considered prior to utilizing a perialar incision during unilateral cleft lip repair.

The Utility of an Open-Access Surgical Simulator to Enhance Surgeon Training.

BACKGROUND: Smile Train, an international children's charity committed to improving cleft care around the world, empowers local medical professionals in developing countries to provide quality comprehensive cleft care in their own communities. As part of their sustainable model, Smile Train developed a web-based, interactive virtual simulator to improve surgical training of cleft procedures for surgeons around the world, replicating the anatomical and technical steps involved in cleft surgery. This study evaluated the simulator as a tool for enhancing surgical training. METHODS: A pre-test and questionnaire addressing cleft care, surgical knowledge, and confidence level was administered to surgeons-in-training at an academic institution. Participants completed 3 simulator modules followed by a post-test and questionnaire to measure changes in knowledge and confidence levels. RESULTS: Sixteen surgeons-in-training participated in this study. The mean score on the knowledge examination increased after reviewing the modules for both junior residents (33.1%-64.4%) and senior residents (46.9%-70.8%). Reviewing the modules increased participants' confidence in the knowledge of cleft anatomy, understanding of surgical procedures, and ability to follow along meaningfully while assisting in operations. CONCLUSIONS: The Smile Train Virtual Surgery Simulator increased knowledge and reported surgeon confidence in understanding and assisting in cleft lip surgery, signifying its usefulness as a training tool for surgeons-in-training. Virtual simulation is a valuable resource for improving understanding and competence of the craniofacial surgeon while serving as an educational resource to other members of the comprehensive cleft care team, patients, and families.

Knowledge and Skills Acquisition by Plastic Surgery Residents through Digital Simulation Training: A Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Trial.

BACKGROUND: Simulation is a standard component of residency training in many surgical subspecialties, yet its impact on knowledge and skills acquisition in plastic surgery training remains poorly defined. The authors evaluated the potential benefits of simulation-based cleft surgery learning in plastic surgery resident education through a prospective, randomized, blinded trial. METHODS: Thirteen plastic surgery residents were randomized to a digital simulator or textbook demonstrating unilateral cleft lip repair. The following parameters were evaluated before and after randomization: knowledge of surgical steps, procedural confidence, markings performance on a three-dimensional stone model, and surgical performance using a hands-on/high-fidelity three-dimensional haptic model. Participant satisfaction with either educational tool was also assessed. Two expert reviewers blindly graded markings and surgical performance. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. Wilcoxon signed rank and Mann-Whitney U tests were used. RESULTS: Interrater reliability was strong for preintervention and postintervention grading of markings [preintervention intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.97 (p < 0.001); postintervention intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.96 (p < 0.001)] and surgical [preintervention intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.83 (p = 0.002); postintervention intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.81 (p = 0.004)] performance. Postintervention surgical knowledge (40.3 ± 4.4 versus 33.5 ± 3.7; p = 0.03), procedural confidence (24.0 ± 7.0 versus 14.7 ± 2.3; p = 0.03), markings performance (8.0 ± 2.5 versus 2.9 ± 3.1; p = 0.03), and surgical performance (12.3 ± 2.5 versus 8.2 ± 2.3; p = 0.04) significantly improved in the digital simulation group compared with before intervention, but not in the textbook group. All participants were more satisfied with the digital simulator as an educational tool (27.7 ± 2.5 versus 14.4 ± 4.4; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The authors present evidence suggesting that digital cognitive simulators lead to significant improvement in surgical knowledge, procedural confidence, markings performance, and surgical performance.

Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair: A Quantitative Scale Assessment of Postoperative Lip and Nose Scars Across 2 Operative Techniques.

BACKGROUND: There is no quantitative evidence supporting one unilateral cleft lip (UCL) repair technique over the other with regard to scarring. We sought to evaluate the difference between the extended Mohler and Millard techniques, using 3 scar assessment scales. METHODS: Postoperative frontal and basal photographs of patients undergoing UCL repair were reviewed. Three validated scar assessment scales were used: the Manchester Scar Scale (MSS), modified scar-rating scale (MSRS), and Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale. Lip and nose scars were rated by 5 independent raters using each of the scales. Interrater reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Assessment of 116 images for 58 consecutive patients undergoing UCL repair (36 extended Mohler, 22 Millard) was performed. Interrater reliability was excellent for lip scars (ICCs, 0.903 [0.857-0.938] for MSS, 0.913 [0.872-0.944] for MSRS, and 0.850 [0.775-0.902] for SBES) and moderate for nose scar assessment (ICCs, 0.714 [0.579-0.816] for MSS, 0.693 [0.548-0.802] for MSRS, and 0.565 [0.359-0.720] for SBES). No statistically significant difference was found between the extended Mohler and Millard repairs in mean lip scar scores (MSS, 6.983 ± 1.469 vs 6.772 ± 1.175, P = 0.571; MSRS, 5.433 ± 1.530 vs 5.481 ± 1.290, P = 0.902; SBES, 3.633 ± 0.977 vs 3.446 ± 0.995, P = 0.483) or nose scar scores (MSS, 5.644 ± 1.131 vs 5.491 ± 0.689, P = 0.523; MSRS, 4.233 ± 0.987 vs 3.991 ± 0.705, P = 0.320; SBES, 3.933 ± 0.750 vs 4.018 ± 0.486, P = 0.603). CONCLUSIONS: Using 3 validated scar assessment scales, no significant difference was found between the extended Mohler and Millard techniques in terms of lip or nose scars.

Qualitative Assessment of Columella Scar Quality After Extended Mohler Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair.

BACKGROUND: The Extended Mohler cleft lip repair restores upper lip form using a columellar flap to fill the defect created by the downward rotation of Cupid's bow. The resulting columella incision is mentioned as a potential drawback. This study seeks to evaluate the morbidity of the resulting scar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 50 unilateral cleft lip patients treated using the Extended Mohler repair. 5 reviewers examined post-operative images. Three validated scar assessment scales were utilized: Manchester Scar Scale (MSS), Modified Scar-Rating Scale (MSRS), and Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES). A scar score for the lip and columellar portion of each patient was determined. RESULTS: Three different scar scales demonstrated significantly better scar quality for the columellar portion of the scar compared to the lip portion. The average score for the lip and columella using the MSS was 7.0 ±â€Š1.4 and 5.7 ±â€Š1.1 (P <0.001). The average score for the lip and columella using the MSRS was 5.5 ±â€Š1.4 and 4.3 ±â€Š0.9 (P <0.001). The average score for the lip and columella using the SBSES was 3.5 ±â€Š1.1 and 3.9 ±â€Š0.7 (P = 0.014). The intraclass correlation coefficient for lip scar assessments was 0.901 (MSS), 0.91 (MSRS), and 0.873 (Stony Brook Evaluation Scale [SBES]). The intraclass correlation coefficient for columellar scar assessment was 0.786 (MSS), 0.761 (MSRS), and 0.726 (SBES). CONCLUSION: The Extended Mohler unilateral cleft lip columellar scar is of superior quality compared to the lip portion. This analysis ameliorates one of the major concerns regarding the Extended Mohler cleft lip repair.

Nasolabial Aesthetics Following Cleft Repair: An Objective Evaluation of Subjective Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the weight and contribution of each of the parameters of the Asher-McDade Scale to overall subjective assessment of nasolabial aesthetics following cleft lip repair. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort evaluation. SETTING: Cleft and craniofacial center. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-one patients who underwent unilateral cleft lip repair. INTERVENTIONS: Unilateral cleft lip repair. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Nasolabial rating using the Asher-McDade scale and overall subjective assessment of nasolabial aesthetics using a rank score following unilateral cleft lip repair. RESULTS: Strong interrater reliability was observed between the 3 raters. Significant association was determined on bivariate analysis between nasal form score (ß = 27.06; P < .001), nasal symmetry score (ß = 26.41; P < .001), nasal profile score (ß = 28.75; P < .001), vermilion border score (ß = 13.40; P = .012), and the ranking score. Adjusted ß coefficients obtained from multivariate regression analysis were used to develop a modified nasolabial appearance score (over 5), that is, weighted for each of the 4 parameters: nasal form (over 8, adjusted ß = 14.33), nasal symmetry (over 5, adjusted ß = 7.96), nasal profile (over 5, adjusted ß = 9.44), and vermilion (over 2, adjusted ß = 3.31). Regression analysis between our modified nasolabial appearance score and patient ranking score demonstrated superior goodness of fit when compared to the Asher-McDade overall nasolabial appearance score (R2 = .80; P < .001 vs R2 = .69; P < .001). CONCLUSION: The parameters evaluated in the Asher-McDade scale have different weights and contribute differently to overall subjective assessment of nasolabial aesthetic outcomes following cleft lip repair. Adjusting for their weights results in a modified score that demonstrates superior correlation with overall subjective assessment of nasolabial aesthetic outcomes.

Three-Dimensional Affordable Stone Models for Cleft Lip Markings: A Prospective Study of Learner Satisfaction.

INTRODUCTION: Knowledge of surgical markings for unilateral cleft lip (UCL) repair is critical for surgical competency. However, few appropriate models are accessible to residents and affordable and accurately reproduce this 3-dimensional (3D) deformity. We propose that cleft care units have the capability of creating affordable 3D stone models to teach UCL markings. METHODS: Polyvinyl siloxane and SnapStone were used to create UCL stone models. Thirteen plastic surgery residents were prospectively recruited, provided with a textbook chapter and online module for studying surgical markings for UCL repair, and then asked to perform the markings on a UCL stone model and standardized patient photograph. Learner satisfaction was evaluated using a modified survey based on the Student Evaluation of Educational Quality survey. RESULTS: The production time of each model was 10 minutes, whereas the cost was $1.84. Participants reported that the stone model was more stimulating (4.77 ± 0.44 vs 3.92 ± 0.86; U = 38.0; P = 0.008), increased their interest more (4.70 ± 0.48 vs 3.53 ± 1.20; U = 33.5; P = 0.005), allowed better learning (4.61 ± 0.51 vs 3.08 ± 0.86; U = 10.0; P < 0.001), was clearer (4.62 ± 0.51 vs 3.15 ± 0.90; U = 12.5; P < 0.001), and was more effective for learning cleft lip markings (4.77 ± 0.44 vs 3.08 ± 1.04; U = 9.0; P < 0.001). They were also more likely to recommend it (4.85 ± 0.38 vs 3.15 ± 1.07; U = 7.0; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgery residents report that 3D cleft lip stone models are superior training tools to learn cleft lip markings compared with patient photographs. These educational tools have the potential to overcome significant financial, logistic, and time constraints in teaching cleft lip surgery markings.

Practical Negotiation for Medical Professionals.

Despite incredible advances in medical innovation and education, many students finish medical school, and physicians finish residency, without sound business acumen regarding the financial realities of the modern profession. The curriculum in medical schools and residency programs too often neglects teaching the business of medicine. This overview addresses how physicians can utilize effective negotiation strategies to help develop a medical practice or add value to an existing practice or institution. The authors applied the six foundations of effective negotiating, detailed by Richard Shell in his Bargaining for Advantage , to the medical field to demonstrate the processes involved in effective negotiating. They then outlined a strategy for physicians to adopt when negotiating and showed how this strategy can be used to add value. The six foundations include: developing a personal bargaining style, setting realistic goals, determining authoritative standards, establishing relationships, exploring the other party's interests, and gaining leverage. As physicians complete training, the ability to solely focus on medical knowledge and clinical patient care disappears. It is crucial that physicians invest the time and energy into preparing for the business aspects of this profession in much the same way they prepare for the clinical care of patients. This overview seeks to define the basics of negotiation, characterize the application of negotiation principles toward clinical medicine, and lay the foundation for further discussion and investigation.

Safety Outcomes in Endoscopic Versus Open Repair of Metopic Craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Premature fusion of the metopic suture leads to a range of clinical presentations, with more severe patients presenting characteristically with trigonocephaly. Endoscopic-assisted correction of craniosynostosis is emerging as an alternative to the gold-standard open cranial vault remodeling. While there are several documented benefits of endoscopic correction, the management of craniosynostosis varies widely in the literature with little consensus as to the preferred timing and surgical technique for repair. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety outcomes of endoscopic versus open surgery at our institution. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients diagnosed with metopic craniosynostosis who underwent open or closed surgical management and received at least 6 months of follow-up. Data extraction was performed via chart review and included demographic information and safety outcome variables. RESULTS: During the study period, 17 patients who met our inclusion criteria were treated by the multidisciplinary craniofacial team at our institution. Eight patients underwent endoscopic surgery and 9 underwent open surgery. The mean age at surgery was significantly higher in the open surgery group than the endoscopic surgery group (13.7 months versus 2.3 months, respectively). Estimated blood loss, percent estimated blood volume lost, transfusion volume, procedure length, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay were all significantly higher in the open surgery group compared with the endoscopic group. CONCLUSIONS: In our patient population, endoscopic surgery for metopic craniosynostosis had an improved safety profile versus open surgery based on reduced procedure length, estimated blood loss, volume of blood transfusion, and length of stay in the ICU and hospital.

Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction: Indications and Evidence for Current Management Strategies.

Breast cancer affects nearly every woman either personally or through a family member or friend. Awareness of associated familial and genetic risks has been steadily increasing over the last decade. Bilateral risk-reduction mastectomy seeks to decrease the incidence and mortality of breast cancer in women without abnormality but with elevated risk of developing cancer. Contralateral risk-reduction mastectomy aims to decrease the incidence of contralateral breast cancer in women diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer. As understanding improves and techniques progress, the relative merits of surgical risk reduction will change as well.

Sildenafil for microcystic lymphatic malformations of the head and neck: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Microcystic lymphatic malformations (LM) are congenital birth defects that can cause severe functional or esthetic deformity. At this time, several treatment interventions are possible, but there is no ideal therapy. A recently published article noted a coincidental improvement in microcystic LMs with the use of sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension, but conclusive and reproducible data is lacking regarding its efficacy. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective study was conducted to examine the subjective and objective results associated with sildenafil use in the treatment of microcystic LMs. Patients under the age of 18 were enrolled, and after evaluation with pre-intervention magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, each was given a 6-week course of sildenafil. Subjective outcomes were obtained, and postoperative MRIs were used to objectively quantify changes. Five patients between the ages of 4 and 11 were enrolled in the study. All patients had microcystic LMs of the head and neck. All patients had undergone previous treatment interventions utilizing various modalities, and each was now seeking treatment for functional and cosmetic purposes. All patients had minimal to no response from a subjective standpoint. Comparison of pre- and post-treatment MRIs also demonstrated minimal to no response. CONCLUSIONS: The use of sildenafil for the treatment of microcystic lymphatic malformations did not have any appreciable effect on our selected population of pediatric patients who had been resistant to previous therapies. Further studies would be necessary to determine if other cohorts may benefit.

Optimizing the closed suction surgical drainage system.

BACKGROUND: Closed suction drains are indicated in a wide array of postoperative settings, with many distinct drainage systems available to the surgeon. The purpose of this study was to compare the suction gradients achieved using 2 different sizes of suction reservoirs and 2 different techniques for generating negative pressure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Drainage reservoirs of 100 and 400 ml were chosen to evaluate their ability to achieve suction. Suction was established in both sizes of drains by pressing the sides of the reservoir together or by pushing the bottom of the reservoir toward the top. Negative pressures were recorded with the reservoir empty, and after every 10-ml addition of saline. Averages were graphed to illustrate the applied suction over a range of drain volumes. RESULTS: The 100-ml drainage system reached a peak suction of -117.6 mmHg, while the 400-ml drainage system reached only a peak suction of -71.4 mmHg. Both of the maximum suction readings were achieved using the full-squeeze technique. The bottom-pushed-in technique did not result in any sustained measurable levels of suction using either of the reservoir volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller drain reservoirs are more successful in generating a high initial suction than larger reservoirs, especially when the volume of fluid in the drain is relatively low. In all sizes of drains, compressing the sides of the reservoir is a far better technique for establishing negative pressure than pressing the bottom of the drain up toward the top.