Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The Role of the Telecommunicator in Recognition of Cardiac Arrest and Delivery of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: Telecommunicator CPR (T-CPR), whereby emergency dispatch facilitates cardiac arrest recognition and coaches CPR over the telephone, is an important strategy to increase early recognition and bystander CPR in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Little is known about this treatment strategy in the pediatric population. We investigated the role of T-CPR and related performance among pediatric OHCA. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study was a retrospective cohort investigation of OHCA among individuals <18 years in King County, Washington, from April 1, 2013, to December 31, 2019. We reviewed the 911 audio recordings to determine if and how bystander CPR was delivered (unassisted or T-CPR), key time intervals in recognition of arrest, and key components of T-CPR delivery. Of the 185 eligible pediatric OHCAs, 23% (n=43) had bystander CPR initiated unassisted, 59% (n=109) required T-CPR, and 18% (n=33) did not receive CPR before emergency medical services arrival. Among all cases, cardiac arrest was recognized by the telecommunicator in 89% (n=165). Among those receiving T-CPR, the median (interquartile range) interval from start of call to OHCA recognition was 59 seconds (38-87) and first CPR intervention was 115 seconds (94-162). When stratified by age (≤8 versus >8), the older age group was less likely to receive CPR before emergency medical services arrival (88% versus 69%, P=0.002). For those receiving T-CPR, bystanders spent a median of 207 seconds (133-270) performing CPR. The median compression rate was 93 per minute (82-107) among those receiving T-CPR. CONCLUSIONS: T-CPR is an important strategy to increase early recognition and early CPR among pediatric OHCA.

Out of hospital cardiac arrest: Past, present, and future.

Advances in resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) provide an opportunity to improve public health. This review reflects on past developments, present status, and future possibilities using the science-education-implementation framework of the Utstein Formula and the clinical framework of the links in the chain of survival. With the discovery of CPR and defibrillation in the mid 20th century, resuscitation developed a scientific construct for progress. Systems of emergency community response provided operational efficiency to treat OHCA. Contemporary resuscitation involves integrated interventions in the chain of survival: early recognition, early CPR, early defibrillation, expert and timely advanced life support and hospital care, and multidimensional rehabilitation. Implementation of scientific advances is especially challenging given the unexpected nature of OHCA, the need for time-sensitive interventions, and the substantial collective of stakeholders involved in the chain of survival. Systematic measurement provides the foundation to evaluate performance and guide implementation initiatives. For many systems, telecommunicator CPR and high-performance CPR by emergency professionals are accessible, near-term programs to improve OHCA outcome. Smart technologies that activate, coordinate, and/or coach community "volunteers" to accelerate early CPR and defibrillation have conceptual promise, though robust implementation has been achieved by only a handful of systems. Longer-term strategies may leverage technology to develop a high-fidelity "life-detector" or engineer and disseminate a specialized consumer defibrillator designed to bridge care until arrival of professional response.

Association between functional status at hospital discharge and long-term survival after out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest.

BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) causes brain injury. Functional status of survivors at hospital discharge is a core resuscitation measure, frequently using the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) or modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Which scale better predicts long-term survival following OHCA is not known. METHODS: We evaluated long-term survival after hospital discharge in a retrospective cohort of persons resuscitated from OHCA in King County, WA from 2007 to 2015. Patients were independently assessed at discharge using both scales, leveraging the regional quality improvement registry, which records the 5-level CPC, and concurrent research studies involving the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium, which used the 7-level mRS, taken from information in the hospital record. The risk of mortality associated with CPC and mRS categories was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Among 878 eligible patients discharged alive, there were 358 deaths during 9118.5 person-years of follow-up. Overall 1, 5 and 10-year survival was 84.4%, 68.5%, and 53.7% and varied according to CPC and mRS (p < 0.01 per Kaplan-Meier). Compared to CPC-1, hazard ratio (HR) increased incrementally for CPC-2 = 1.33 (1.03-1.73), CPC-3 = 1.90 (1.37-2.65), and CPC-4 = 8.25 (5.63-12.10). Compared to mRS = 0, HR for mRS-1 = 1.02 (0.66-1.58), mRS-2 = 1.52 (1.00-2.32), mRS-3 = 1.41 (0.92-2.14), mRS-4 = 2.00 (1.37-2.97), and mRS-5 = 4.90 (3.23-7.44). CONCLUSION: In OHCA survivors, CPC and mRS scales both predicted long-term survival. However mRS 0-1 and 2-3 groups did not have distinct prognoses, suggesting that a consolidated mRS score may simplify capture of relevant prognostic information for survival predictions.

Merits of expanding the Utstein case definition for out of hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: The Utstein population is defined by non-traumatic, bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) presenting with ventricular fibrillation (VF). It is used to compare resuscitation performance across emergency medical services (EMS) systems. We hypothesized a system-specific survival correlation between the current Utstein population and other VF populations defined by unwitnessed VF OHCA and VF OHCA after EMS arrival (EMS-witnessed). Expanding performance metrics to this more comprehensive population would make the Utstein definition more representative of the actual community burden and response to VF OHCA. METHODS: We performed a cohort investigation of all non-traumatic, VF OHCA in the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival from 1/1/2013-12/31/2018 among EMS agencies that treated > = 100 VF OHCA. We evaluated sample size and survival with the addition of the new VF populations. We used Pearson coefficient to assess whether there was a correlation of agency-specific survival outcomes between the current Utstein population and unwitnessed and EMS-witnessed VF OHCA. RESULTS: A total of 107 EMS agencies treated 38,836 VF arrests: 22,918 current Utstein, 11,297 unwitnessed VF, and 4621 EMS-witnessed VF OHCA. Overall, survival was 29.8% (11,567/38,836): 33.9% (7774/22,918) among current Utstein, 17.2% (1942/11,297) among unwitnessed VF, and 40.1% (1851/4621) among EMS-witnessed VF. For agency-specific survival outcome, the Pearson correlation was 0.52 between the current Utstein population versus combined unwitnessed and EMS-witnessed groups. For survival with Cerebral Performance Category 1-2, the Pearson correlation was 0.61. CONCLUSION: Expanding the Utstein population to include unwitnessed and EMS-witnessed VF OHCA achieves a simpler, more inclusive case definition that minimizes variability in case determination and increases the number of survivors and eligible population by ∼50%, while still achieving a distinguishing metric of system-specific performance.

Seizure-like presentation in OHCA creates barriers to dispatch recognition of cardiac arrest.

PURPOSE: Early recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) by 9-1-1 dispatchers is a critical first step along the resuscitation pathway. Barriers to recognition may lead to adverse outcomes among patients. This study aims to determine the impact of seizure-like activity among OHCA patients during 9-1-1 calls. METHODS: We evaluated a retrospective cohort study of all adult, non-traumatic OHCAs that occurred prior to emergency medical services (EMS) arrival on scene in a major metropolitan area from 2014-2018. Dispatch recordings were reviewed to determine if seizure-like activity was reported by the caller using key descriptor phrases such as "seizing," "shaking," or "convulsing." We compared patient demographics, arrest factors, and hospital outcomes using a regional OHCA quality improvement database. RESULTS: Among 3502 OHCAs meeting our inclusion criteria, 149 (4.3%) contained seizure-like activity. When compared to patients without seizure-like activity (3353; 95.7%), patients presenting with seizure-like activity were younger (54 vs. 66 years old; p < 0.05), had a witnessed arrest (88% vs 45%; p < 0.05), presented with an initial shockable rhythm (52% vs. 24%; p < 0.05), and survived to hospital discharge (44% vs. 16%; p < 0.05). The seizure-like activity group also had a longer median time to dispatcher identification of the cardiac arrest [130 s (72,193) vs 62 s (43,102); p < 0.05]. CONCLUSIONS: Reported seizure-like activity among patients in cardiac arrest poses a barrier to recognition of cardiac arrests by dispatchers leading to delays in resuscitation instructions.

Telecommunicator Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association.

Every year in the United States, >350 000 people have sudden cardiac arrest outside of a hospital environment. Sudden cardiac arrest is the unexpected loss of heart function, breathing, and consciousness and is commonly the result of an electric disturbance in the heart. Unfortunately, only ≈1 in 10 victims survives this dramatic event. Early access to 9-1-1 and early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are the first 2 links in the chain of survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Although 9-1-1 is frequently accessed, in the majority of cases, individuals with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest do not receive lay rescuer CPR and wait for the arrival of professional emergency rescuers. Telecommunicators are the true first responders and a critical link in the cardiac arrest chain of survival. In partnership with the 9-1-1 caller, telecommunicators have the first opportunity to identify a patient in cardiac arrest and provide initial care by delivering CPR instructions while quickly dispatching emergency medical services. The telecommunicator and the caller form a unique team in which the expertise of the telecommunicator is provided just in time to a willing caller, transforming the caller into a lay rescuer delivering CPR. The telecommunicator CPR (T-CPR) process, also previously described as dispatch CPR, dispatch-assisted CPR, or telephone CPR, represents an important opportunity to improve survival from sudden cardiac arrest. Conversely, failure to provide T-CPR in this manner results in preventable harm. This statement describes the public health impact of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, provides guidance and resources to construct and maintain a T-CPR program, outlines the minimal acceptable standards for timely and high-quality delivery of T-CPR instructions, and identifies strategies to overcome common implementation barriers to T-CPR.

Strategy to Address Private Location Cardiac Arrest: A Public Safety Survey.

OBJECTIVE: Most cardiac arrests occur in the private setting where response is often delayed and outcomes are poor. We surveyed public safety personnel to determine if they would volunteer to respond into private locations and/or be equipped with a personal automated external defibrillator (AED) as part of a vetted responder program that would use smart geospatial technology. METHODS: We conducted an anonymized survey among personnel from fire-based emergency medical services (EMS) and search and rescue organizations from Washington State. The goal of the survey was to evaluate whether there was interest among cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)-trained, public safety personnel to respond with or without an AED to private-residence cardiac arrest outside of working hours using a smartphone platform. We used a 5-point Likert scale to assess responses. RESULTS: Overall the response rate was 73.7% (527/715). Two-thirds of respondents were between the ages of 30-59 with a similar proportion certified as a firefighter-emergency medical technician (EMT). Most were male (80%). As a vetted volunteer responder, the majority would "almost always" or "often" respond to private (79.7%) or public locations (85.2%) outside of work hours. The majority (54.1%) would store the AED in their vehicle while 38% would plan to keep the AED on their person. A total of 83% were "definitely' or "probably interested" in participating in the program. CONCLUSION: The results of this survey indicate that public safety personnel are willing to respond to suspected cardiac arrest during off-hours using geospatial smart technology to private locations with or without an AED.

Syringe Administration of Epinephrine by Emergency Medical Technicians for Anaphylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: In recent years, the costs of epinephrine autoinjectors (EAIs) in the United States have risen substantially. King County Emergency Medical Services implemented the "Check and Inject" program to replace EAIs by teaching emergency medical technicians (EMTs) to manually aspirate epinephrine from a single-use 1 mg/mL epinephrine vial using a needle and syringe followed by prehospital intramuscular administration of the correct adult or pediatric dose of epinephrine for anaphylaxis or serious allergic reaction. Treatment was guided by an EMT protocol that required a trigger and symptoms. We sought to determine if the "Check and Inject" program was safely implemented by EMTs treating presumed prehospital anaphylaxis or serious allergic reaction. METHODS: We conducted a prospective investigation of all cases treated as part of the "Check and Inject" program from July 2014 through December 2016 in suburban King County, Washington, and January 2016 through December 2016 within the city of Seattle. All cases were prospectively collected using a custom quality improvement data form completed by the first responding EMTs. Two physicians completed a structured review of each EMS medical record to determine if the EMTs followed the Check and Inject protocol and determine if epinephrine was clinically-indicated based on physician review. RESULTS: Of the 411 cases eligible for analysis, EMTs followed the protocol appropriately in 367 (89.3%) cases. In the remaining 44 (10.7%) cases, the EMS incident report form failed to document either a clear inciting allergic trigger or an appropriate symptom from the protocol list. Physician review determined that epinephrine was clinically indicated in 36 of the 44 cases. Among the remaining 8 cases (1.9%) that did not meet protocol criteria and were not clinically-indicated based on physician review, none had a documented adverse reaction to the epinephrine. CONCLUSION: We observed that EMTs successfully implemented the manual "Check and Inject" program for severe allergic reactions and anaphylaxis in a manner that typically agreed with physician review and without any overt identified safety issues.

Determining witnessed status for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE: Witnessed status is considered a core variable in reporting cardiac arrest data and can be ascertained from either the emergency dispatch recording or the pre-hospital record. The purpose of this study is to compare and assess the quality and consistency of these information sources. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 1896 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurring between September 1, 2012 and December 31, 2014. RESULTS: We found that there was minimal (kappa=0.30, 95% CI 0.27-0.33) to moderate (kappa=0.64, 95% CI 0.59-0.69) agreement between the pre-hospital record and the emergency dispatch recording when these sources of information are used to determine witnessed status. Witnessed status could not be determined from the emergency dispatch recording in 36.2% (n=684) of eligible cases. Survival was similar regardless of the method used to determine witnessed status. Using a combination of the pre-hospital record and the emergency dispatch recording yielded the highest number of witnessed cases. CONCLUSION: The determination of witnessed status in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest may be challenging, as evidenced by the discrepancies in witnessed status when comparing different sources of information. The large number of cases where the witnessed status could not be determined from the emergency dispatch recording precludes its use as the sole source of information. It is reasonable to use the patient care record alone, however it should be recognized that there is misclassification of witnessed status regardless of the method used and this may affect the strength of association between witnessed status and survival.

Treatment and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in outpatient health care facilities.

AIM: We evaluated the frequency and effectiveness of basic and advanced life support (ALS) interventions by medical professionals when out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurred in ambulatory healthcare clinics before emergency medical services (EMS) arrival. METHODS: Non-traumatic OHCAs in adults were systematically characterized over a 15 year period by their occurrence in clinics, at home, or in non-medical public locations, and outcomes compared between matched cohorts from each group. RESULTS: Among 7784 patients, 6098 OHCA occurred at home, 1612 in non-medical public locations and 74 in clinics. Compared to non-medical public locations, clinic patients with OHCA were older, more often women and more frequently shocked; clinic arrests were more often witnessed, less likely to be of cardiac cause and to occur before EMS arrival. Compared to home, more clinic arrests were witnessed, occurred after EMS arrival, had bystander CPR, shockable rhythms and were defibrillated. When OHCA occurred before EMS arrival, 51 of 56 clinic patients (91%) received CPR, a defibrillator applied to 23 (41%), 17 (30%) were shocked, 4 (7%) intubated, and 7 (13%) received intravenous medications from facility personnel. Of these, only pre-EMS defibrillator use was associated with improved outcome. Among matched patients, OHCA survival was higher in clinics than at home (42% vs 26%, p=0.029), but comparable to other public locations. CONCLUSIONS: Survival from OHCA in clinics was comparable to non-medical public locations, and higher than at home. Alongside CPR, use of defibrillators was associated with improved survival and worth prioritizing over other interventions before EMS arrival regardless of OHCA location.