Relationship Between Hospital Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Volume and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine whether hospital surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) volume was associated with corresponding transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) outcomes. BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated a volume-outcome relationship for TAVR. METHODS: In total, 208,400 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries were analyzed for all aortic valve replacement procedures from 2012 to 2015. Claims for patients <65 years of age, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, other heart valve procedures, or other major open heart procedures were excluded, as were secondary admissions for aortic valve replacement. Hospital SAVR volumes were stratified on the basis of mean annual SAVR procedures during the study period. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year post-operative TAVR survival. Adjusted survival following TAVR was assessed using multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 65,757 SAVR and 42,967 TAVR admissions were evaluated. Among TAVR procedures, 21.7% (n = 9,324) were performed at hospitals with <100 (group 1), 35.6% (n = 15,298) at centers with 100 to 199 (group 2), 22.9% (n = 9,828) at centers with 200 to 299 (group 3), and 19.8% (n = 8,517) at hospitals with ≥300 SAVR cases/year (group 4). Compared with group 4, 30-day TAVR mortality risk-adjusted odds ratios were 1.32 (95% confidence interval: 1.18 to 1.47) for group 1, 1.25 (95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 1.39) for group 2, and 1.08 (95% confidence interval: 0.82 to 1.25) for group 3. These adjusted survival differences in TAVR outcomes persisted at 1 year post-procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Total hospital SAVR volume appears to be correlated with TAVR outcomes, with higher 30-day and 1-year mortality observed at low-volume centers. These data support the importance of a viable surgical program within the heart team, and the use of minimum SAVR hospital thresholds may be considered as an additional metric for TAVR performance.

Impact of Prosthesis Size and Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Outcomes in Younger Female Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement.

The effects of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) suggest worse outcomes with smaller valves. We assessed clinical outcomes of younger females undergoing SAVR, using small and large prostheses, and the incremental risk of PPM. Between January 2002 and June 2015, 451 younger (age ≤65 years) female patients underwent SAVR. Patients were stratified into small prostheses (SP) ≤21 mm (n = 256) and large prostheses (LP) ≥23 mm (n = 195) groups. PPM was classified as moderate if indexed effective orifice area (iEOA) 0.65-0.85 cm2/m2, or severe if iEOA <0.65 cm2/m2. Operative mortality was not statistically different between SP and LP groups (2.4% vs 0.5%; P = 0.146). Unadjusted 10-year survival was 82% (95% confidence interval 77-87%), and was similar in both groups (P = 0.210). When grouped by standard PPM thresholds, only severe PPM was associated with significantly decreased survival (P = 0.007). A significant survival decrease was detected in LP group with iEOA ≤0.75 cm2/m2 (P < 0.001). Among SP patients, iEOA ≤0.65 cm2/m2 was associated with increased mortality (P = 0.075). After adjusting for potential confounders, Cox proportional hazard model identified iEOAs of ≤0.65 cm2/m2 (hazard ratio 1.85; P = 0.066) and ≤0.75 cm2/m2 (hazard ratio 2.3; P ≤ 0.003) as predictors of decreased long-term survival, in SP and LP groups, respectively. Among younger females who underwent SAVR, postoperative complications and in-hospital outcomes were substantially similar between the SP and LP groups. However, patients who received LP were adversely affected at lesser degrees of PPM than those who received SP. While SP patients may tolerate until iEOA ≤0.65 cm2/m2, our results suggest that moderate PPM of iEOA ≤0.75 for LP patients should be avoided.

Utility of 90-Day Mortality vs 30-Day Mortality as a Quality Metric for Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes.

Importance: Questions have recently arisen as to whether 30-day mortality is a reasonable metric for understanding institutional practice differences after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Objective: To examine the utility of 30-day vs 90-day mortality after TAVR and SAVR as a mortality quality metric. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationally representative, multicenter, cohort study analyzed data from Medicare beneficiaries undergoing TAVR and SAVR procedures from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2015. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting and other heart valve or other major open-heart procedures were excluded. Hospitals that performed fewer than 50 TAVR or 70 SAVR procedures per year were excluded to ensure reliable estimates and to reduce the risks of inflated results because of small institutional sample sizes. Data were analyzed from October 2018 to August 2019. Exposures: Hospitals were ranked into top- (10%), middle- (80%), and bottom-performing (10%) groups based on their 4-year mean 30-day mortality. Main Outcomes and Measures: Changes in hospital performance rankings at 90 days and 1 year and correlation of 30- and 90-day mortality with 1-year mortality were examined. Results: A total of 30 329 TAVR admissions at 184 hospitals and 26 021 SAVR admissions at 191 hospitals were evaluated. For TAVR, 40 hospitals (21.7%) changed performance rankings at 90 days: 13 (48.1%) in the top-performing group and 8 (29.6%) in the bottom-performing group. At 1 year, 56 hospitals (30.4%), which included 21 (77.8%) in the top-performing group and 12 (44.4%) in the bottom-performing group, changed rankings. Similar findings were observed for SAVR, with an overall 90-day conversion rate of 17.3% and a 1-year rate of 30.3%. These findings persisted after adjusting for the differences in patient risk profiles among the 3 groups. Capturing 90-day events was also more robustly informative regarding expected 1-year outcomes after both TAVR and SAVR, largely owing to the observed plateau in the instantaneous hazard observed beyond this point. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that evaluation of hospital performance based on 30-day mortality may underestimate outcomes and therefore substantially misrepresent institutional performance after TAVR and SAVR compared with 90-day mortality, even after risk adjustment. Although 30-day mortality has been validated, 90-day mortality may be a more reliable outcome metric for measuring hospital performance and capturing procedure-related mortality.

Significance of Interstitial Lung Disease on Outcomes Following Cardiac Surgery.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a known risk factor for noncardiac surgery due to acute pulmonary exacerbations but its impact after cardiac surgery is not known. We examined perioperative outcomes and risk factors for long-term survival in ILD patients who underwent cardiac surgery. From January 2002 to June 2017, 294 cardiac surgery patients with a previous ILD diagnosis, including 75 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), were identified. A comparison cohort of 1,481 non-ILD patients was selected based on a priori variables. Long-term survival was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard modeling. Median follow-up was 6.4 years. ILD patients had higher postoperative mortality, reintubation rates, longer intensive care unit stay, and higher 30-day readmission rates (all p <0.05). Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival at 1, 5, and 10 years were 89%, 62%, and 37% for the non-IPF ILD cohort, 89%, 50%, and 13% for the IPF cohort, and 95%, 82%, and 67% for the comparison cohort, respectively (overall p <0.001). These significant differences in survival persisted in our risk-adjusted survival analysis. Adjusted survival analysis identified IPF (hazard ratio 3.04) and ILD (non-IPF; hazard ratio 1.78) as significant contributors to all-cause mortality. However, there were no changes in pulmonary function tests after 48 months postprocedure. In conclusion, ILD patients who underwent cardiac surgery have increased operative mortality, reintubation rates, longer intensive care unit, and higher 30-day readmissions compared with non-ILD patients. Moreover, severity of ILD, especially in IPF, appears to be associated with shorter long-term survival. In these patients, pulmonary risk stratification and multidisciplinary team approach are crucial.

Mitral valve repair using edge-to-edge technique in various situations: real-world experiences.

OBJECTIVES: Edge-to-edge (E2E) mitral valve repair (MVP) is a versatile technique used in various situations for mitral regurgitation (MR). This technique has been regaining attention, given the increasing use of the MitraClip procedure. This real-world study evaluates the durability of the E2E technique in different settings. METHODS: From January 2002 to May 2015, a total of 303 patients with at least moderate MR who underwent E2E MVP were identified. Patients undergoing isolated MVP (n = 133) and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting or other valvular procedures (N = 170) were included. Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to evaluate the risk factors for cumulative survival, or MV event (i.e. MV reintervention or MR recurrence) while event-free survival-defined as time to composite outcome of either death or MV event-was determined using competing risk Kaplan-Meier analysis. Median follow-up duration was 6.9 (interquartile range 5.8) years. RESULTS: The most common MR aetiology was myxomatous (34%), followed by Barlow's disease (27.7%), and ischaemic (21.5%). E2E MVP was performed for the following indications: persistent MR (51.5%), systolic anterior motion prophylaxis (22.1%), transaortic approach (17.5%) and systolic anterior motion treatment post-MVP (8.9%). Concomitant ring annuloplasty was performed in 224 patients (73.9%). Operative mortality was 3.6% and MV event rate was 18.5%. Significant predictors of decreased survival included age, renal insufficiency, peripheral vascular disease and ischaemic MR aetiology (all P < 0.050). No ring annuloplasty (HR 2.79; P < 0.001) was the only significant predictor of MV events. Estimated event-free survival for the overall cohort was 8.5 years, and shortest for functional (non-ischaemic; 6.6 years) and ischaemic aetiology (5.5 years). CONCLUSIONS: E2E repair is a versatile MVP technique, which can be used in prevention and treatment of systolic anterior motion, transaortic approach or with concomitant techniques, with reasonable outcomes. Ischaemic aetiology and absence of ring annuloplasty were associated with worse cumulative survival and MV event rates, respectively, which raises some concern in light of the expanding indication for MitraClip system.

Management of Reducible Ventral Hernias: Clinical Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness of Repair at Diagnosis Versus Watchful Waiting.

OBJECTIVE: To compare long-term clinical and economic outcomes associated with 3 management strategies for reducible ventral hernia: repair at diagnosis (open or laparoscopic) and watchful waiting. BACKGROUND: There is variability in ventral hernia management. Recent data suggest watchful waiting is safe; however, long-term clinical and economic outcomes for different management strategies remain unknown. METHODS: We built a state-transition microsimulation model to forecast outcomes for individuals with reducible ventral hernia, simulating a cohort of 1 million individuals for each strategy. We derived cohort characteristics (mean age 58 years, 63% female), hospital costs, and perioperative mortality from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2003-2011), and additional probabilities, costs, and utilities from the literature. Outcomes included prevalence of any repair, emergent repair, and recurrence; lifetime costs; quality-adjusted life years (QALYs); and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. We performed stochastic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to identify parameter thresholds that affect optimal management, using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY. RESULTS: With watchful waiting, 39% ultimately required repair (14% emergent) and 24% recurred. Seventy per cent recurred with repair at diagnosis. Laparoscopic repair at diagnosis was cost-effective compared with open repair at diagnosis (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $27,700/QALY). The choice of operative strategy (open vs laparoscopic) was sensitive to cost and postoperative quality of life. When perioperative mortality exceeded 5.2% or yearly recurrence exceeded 19.2%, watchful waiting became preferred. CONCLUSIONS: Ventral hernia repair at diagnosis is very cost-effective. The choice between open and laparoscopic repair depends on surgical costs and postoperative quality of life. In patients with high risk of perioperative mortality or recurrence, watchful waiting is preferred.

Decreased preoperative functional status is associated with increased mortality following coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Functional status prior to coronary artery bypass graft surgery may be a risk factor for post-operative adverse events. We sought to examine the association between functional status in the 3 months prior to coronary artery bypass graft surgery and subsequent 180 day mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a single center retrospective cohort study in 718 adults who received coronary artery bypass graft surgery from 2002 to 2014. EXPOSURES: The exposure of interest was functional status determined within the 3 months preceding coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Functional status was measured and rated by a licensed physical therapist based on qualitative categories adapted from the Functional Independence Measure. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was 180-day all-cause mortality. A categorical risk prediction score was derived based on a logistic regression model of the function grades for each assessment. RESULTS: In a logistic regression model adjusted for age, gender, New York Heart Association Class III/IV, chronic lung disease, hypertension, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, the lowest quartile of functional status was associated with an increased odds of 180-day mortality compared to patients with highest quartile of functional status [OR = 4.45 (95%CI 1.35, 14.69; P = 0.014)]. CONCLUSIONS: Lower functional status prior to coronary artery bypass graft surgery is associated with increased 180-day all-cause mortality.

Molecular Genetics of Lidocaine-Containing Cardioplegia in the Human Heart During Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: During cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, delivery of cardioplegia solution to achieve electromechanical cardiac quiescence is obligatory. The addition of lidocaine to cardioplegia has advantages, although its consequences at a molecular level remain unclear. We performed whole-genome RNA sequencing of the human left ventricular (LV) myocardium to elucidate the differences between whole-blood (WB) cardioplegia with and without addition of lidocaine (LC) on gene expression. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 130 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement surgery. Patients received high-potassium blood cardioplegia either with (n = 37) or without (n = 93) lidocaine. The LV apex was biopsied at baseline, and after an average of 74 minutes of cold cardioplegic arrest. We performed differential gene expression analysis for 18,258 genes between these 2 groups. Clinical and demographic variables were adjusted in the model. Gene ontology (GO) and network enrichment analysis of the retained genes were performed using g:Profiler and Cytoscape. RESULTS: A total of 1,298 genes were differentially expressed between cardioplegic treatments. Compared with the WB group, genes upregulated in the LC group were identified by network enrichment to play a protective role in ischemic injury by inhibiting apoptosis, increasing transferrin endocytosis, and increasing cell viability. Downregulated genes in the LC group were identified to play a role in inflammatory diseases, oxygen transport, and neutrophil aggregation. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of lidocaine to cardioplegia had pronounced effects on a molecular level with genes responsible for decreased inflammation, reduced intracellular calcium binding, enhanced antiapoptotic protection, augmented oxygen accessibility through transferrins, and increased cell viability showing measurable differences.

Current Readings: Single vs Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

There is strong retrospective data demonstrating that bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafting leads to better long-term survival as compared to left internal mammary artery grafting. However, this survival advantage was not corroborated by the interim results of the Arterial Revascularization Trial. Today, there are barriers to widespread adoption of BIMA grafting. One of the main disadvantages of the use of BIMA grafts is the higher risk of deep sternal wound infection. Deep sternal wound infections can be minimized by skeletonized harvesting of the internal mammary artery grafts, which preserve blood flow to the sternum. Also, utilizing the BIMA graft as a "Y" graft may lead to more complete revascularization compared to its in situ use. BIMA grafting on average takes 25 minutes longer operating time with a higher in-hospital costs. We eagerly await the 10-year results of the Arterial Revascularization Trial to determine the truly unbiased randomized long-term effectiveness of BIMA grafting.

Outcomes of repeat mitral valve replacement in patients with prior mitral surgery: A benchmark for transcatheter approaches.

OBJECTIVES: With the emergence of transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve/ring replacement for deteriorated bioprostheses or failed repair, comparative clinical benchmarks for surgical repeat mitral valve replacement (re-MVR) are needed. We present in-hospital and survival outcomes of a 24-year experience with re-MVR. METHODS: From January 1992 to June 2015, 520 adult patients underwent re-MVR; 273 had undergone prior mitral valve repair (pMVP) and 247 had undergone prior MVR (pMVR). A benchmark cohort of isolated re-MVR was defined based on potential eligibility for transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve/ring replacement, resulting in 73 pMVPs with previous annuloplasty rings and 74 pMVRs with previous bioprosthetic valves for comparison. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, mean age was 64 ± 12 years for pMVP patients and 63 ± 15 years for pMVR patients (P = .281), which was similar for the benchmark cohort. Overall operative mortality was 14 out of 273 (5%) for pMVP versus 23 out of 247 (9%) for pMVR (P = .087). There were 3 operative deaths (4.1%) in both groups of the benchmark cohort (P = 1.0). For the benchmark cohort, median time to reoperation was 9.8 years for pMVP and 9.1 years for pMVR. Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that chronic kidney disease (hazard ratio [HR], 2.47; 95% CI, 1.77-3.44), endocarditis (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.07-2.07), pMVR (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.12-1.89), early reoperation ≤ 1 year (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.02-2.17), and age (HR, 1.04/y; 95% CI, 1.03-1.05) were associated with decreased survival after re-MVR. CONCLUSIONS: A re-MVR is a high-risk operation, but in carefully selected patients such as our benchmark population, it can be performed with acceptable results. Patients undergoing pMVP also have better long-term survival compared with patients undergoing pMVR. These results will serve as a benchmark for transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve/ring replacement.

Surgical pulmonary embolectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis for treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) with preserved hemodynamics but right ventricular dysfunction, classified as submassive PE, carries a high risk of mortality. We report the results for patients who did not qualify for medical therapy and required treatment of submassive PE with surgical pulmonary embolectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). METHODS: Between October 1999 and May 2015, 133 submassive PE patients underwent treatment with pulmonary embolectomy (71) and CDT (62). A multidisciplinary PE response team helped to determine the most appropriate treatment strategy on a case-by-case basis. The EkoSonic ultrasound-facilitated thrombolysis system (EKOS) was used for CDT, which was introduced in 2010. RESULTS: The mean age of submassive PE patients was 57.3 years, which included 36.8% females. PE risk factors included previous deep venous thrombosis (46.6%), immobility (36.1%), recent surgery (30.8%), and cancer (22.6%), P < 0.05. The most common indication for advanced treatment was right ventricular strain (42.9%), P = 0.03. The frequency of surgical pulmonary embolectomy remained stable even after incorporating the EKOS procedure into our treatment algorithm, with statistically similar operative mortality. Bleeding was observed in six CDT patients and one pulmonary embolectomy patient (P < 0.05). Follow-up echocardiography was available for 61% of the overall cohort, of whom 76.5% had no residual moderate or severe right ventricular dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary embolectomy and CDT are important contemporary advanced treatment options for selected high-risk patients with submassive PE, who do not qualify for medical therapy.

Unplanned reoperation after hepatectomy: an analysis of risk factors and outcomes.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Reoperation is being increasingly utilized as a metric for surgical care quality. The aim of this study was to identify the incidence of and risk factors for unplanned reoperation following index hepatectomy. METHODS: Pre, intra- and post-operative information of patients who underwent partial hepatectomy in 435 hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2011 to 2013 were analyzed. RESULTS: 343 (4%) of 9195 patients required reoperation within 30 days of index hepatectomy. The index procedures with the highest incidence of reoperation (%) were trisectionectomy (7%) and right hepatectomy (5%). Patients who underwent reoperation had increased index operative duration (323 ± 174 min versus 243 ± 125 min, p < 0.001), postoperative transfusion (57% versus 23%, p < 0.001), wound complications, cardiorespiratory, renal, thromboembolic, and infectious events. Hemorrhage was the most common indication for reoperation (10%). Male gender, ASA class 4, and right hepatectomy or trisectionectomy were independent predictors of reoperation (OR 1.4 [1.1-1.7], p = 0.007; 2.0 [1.3-3.1], p = 0.003; 1.6 [1.2-2.0], p = 0.001 and 2.5 [1.8-3.4], p < 0.001, respectively). All reoperations occurred during index hospitalization and resulted in longer mean length of stay (19 ± 17 days versus 7 ± 7 days, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Reoperation is associated with several patient characteristics and procedural factors in this national sample. Knowledge of these factors can increase awareness of patients at risk for reoperation.

Novel fast-track recovery protocol for alternative access transcatheter aortic valve replacement: application to non-femoral approaches.

OBJECTIVES: Although the transfemoral approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement is the preferred choice, alternative access remains indicated for inadequate iliofemoral vessels. We report the successful implementation of a novel fast-track (FT) protocol for patients undergoing alternative access transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with conventional controls. METHODS: Between September 2014 and January 2017, 31 and 23 patients underwent alternative access transcatheter aortic valve replacement under FT and pre-fast-track (p-FT) protocols, respectively. Comparisons of outcomes (in terms of mortality, complications, readmissions and resource utilization) were made before and after the implantation of the FT protocol in September 2015. RESULTS: Overall, mean age was 78.7 years in FT and 79.6 years in p-FT patients (P = 0.71). There were no significant differences in procedural (3.2% vs 13.0%, P = 0.301) or 90-day mortality (3.2% vs 17.4%, P = 0.151) between the FT and p-FT groups, respectively. Compared with p-FT patients, FT patients had significantly shorter intensive care unit stays (12 h vs 27 h, P = 0.006) and a trend towards more discharges within 3 days (41.9% vs 17.4%, P = 0.081). Resource utilization analyses projected a 56% and 17% reduction in the mean intensive care unit time (hours) per 100 patients and the total length of stay (days) per 100 patients, respectively, with respect to the FT approach. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of the novel FT protocol for alternative access transcatheter aortic valve replacement, resulting in shorter intensive care unit stays, without increasing procedural complications or readmissions. With the expected increase in transcatheter aortic valve replacement utilization, FT protocols should be integrated with a multidisciplinary heart team approach to enhance patient recovery and optimize resource utilization.

Early and Midterm Outcomes of Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement-Reimplantation Technique.

BACKGROUND: Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) is an increasingly popular alternative to traditional aortic root replacement for aortic root aneurysm disease with a normal aortic valve. We evaluated the early and midterm outcomes of VSARR-reimplantation technique (VSARR-RT) done at a single institution over a decade. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all patients who underwent VSARR-RT between January 2004 and July 2014. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients underwent VSARR-RT. Median time to latest echocardiographic follow-up was 4 years (range: 15-72 months). Total observation time was 491 patient years. Mean age was 44.6 ± 14.3 years, and 13 (15%) were women. Thirty-nine (46%) patients had a connective tissue disorder and 6 (7%) had a bicuspid aortic valve. Thirty-three (39%) patients underwent concomitant procedures, including coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 9, 11%), mitral valve repair (n = 8, 9%), and aortic hemi-arch replacement (n = 7, 8%). There were no operative deaths or in-house mortality and no postoperative strokes. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated survival of 99% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 97-100%) at 2 years and 98% (95% CI: 97-100%) at 8 years. Freedom from reoperation was 95.8% (95% CI: 91.2-100%) at 8 years. Freedom from endocarditis was 100% at 8 years. At the last echocardiographic follow-up, 95% of patients were free of severe aortic regurgitation (AR) and 82% free of moderate AR. Of the four patients who had severe AR, three underwent reoperations and received prosthetic valves and one is being clinically monitored. CONCLUSION: This study reports early and midterm outcomes after VSARR-RT at our institution, including those patients who underwent a VSARR-RT procedure combined with other procedures. Further follow-up remains necessary to determine long-term outcomes.

Should the dilated ascending aorta be repaired at the time of bicuspid aortic valve replacement?

OBJECTIVES: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital valvular abnormality and frequently presents with accelerated calcific aortic valve disease, requiring aortic valve replacement (AVR) and thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection. Supporting evidence for Association Guidelines of aortic dimensions for aortic resection is sparse. We sought to determine whether concurrent repair of dilated or aneurysmal aortic disease during AVR in patients with BAV substantially improves morbidity and mortality outcomes. METHODS: Mortality and reoperation outcomes of 1301 adults with BAV and dilated aorta undergoing AVR-only surgery were compared to patients undergoing AVR with aortic resection (AVR-AR) using Cox proportional hazards modelling and patient matching. RESULTS: Clinically important differences in patient characteristics, aortic valve function and aortic dimensions were identified between cohorts. Event rates were low, with rates of reoperation and death within 1 year of only 1.8% and 5.4%, respectively, and no aortic dissection observed during follow-up. There were no significant differences in reoperation or mortality outcomes between the AVR-only and AVR-AR cohorts. Age, aortic dimension or a combination thereof was not associated with better or worse outcomes after each AVR-AR compared with AVR. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude AVR-only and AVR-AR surgery have low morbidity and mortality and have utility over a wide range of age and aortic sizes. Our results do not provide support for the 45-mm aortic dimension recommended in the current guidelines for aortic resection while performing AVR or any other specific dimension.

Severity of tricuspid regurgitation is associated with long-term mortality.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between intraoperative/presurgical grade of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and mortality, and to determine whether surgical correction of TR correlated with an increased chance of survival compared with patients with uncorrected TR. METHODS: The grade of TR assessed by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before surgical intervention was reviewed for 23,685 cardiac surgery patients between 1990 and 2014. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to determine association between grade of TR and the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality. Association between tricuspid valve (TV) surgery and survival was determined with Cox proportional hazard regression models after matching for grade of TR. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated a relationship between all grades of TR. Multivariable analysis of the entire cohort demonstrated significantly increased mortality for moderate (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.4; P < .0001) and severe TR (HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.57-2.6; P < .0001). Mild TR displayed a trend for mortality (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.99-1.16; P = .075). After matching for grade of TR and additional confounders, patients who underwent TV surgery had a statistically significant increased likelihood of survival (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61-0.91; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Our study of more than 20,000 patients demonstrates that grade of TR is associated with increased risk of mortality after cardiac surgery. In addition, all patients who underwent TV surgery had a statistically significantly increased likelihood of survival compared with those with the same degree of TR who did not undergo TV surgery.

Effectiveness and Safety of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients With "Porcelain" Aorta.

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with porcelain aorta is considered a high-risk procedure. Hence, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is emerging as the intervention of choice. However, there is a paucity of data directly comparing TAVI with SAVR in patients with porcelain aorta. We compared outcomes of TAVI versus SAVR in high-risk patients with porcelain between March 2012 and June 2015. The TAVI group included 54 patients, whereas 130 SAVR patients with porcelain aorta were identified (operated on between 2004 and 2015). Both groups were matched 1:1 based on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) score with a 0.5% a priori caliper, resulting in 52 matched pairs. The mean STS-PROM was 7.3 ± 3.9 for both groups (p = 0.98), whereas mean age was 77.5 years for TAVI and 78.8 years for SAVR (p = 0.46). Compared with SAVR, TAVI patients had lower operative mortality (3.8% vs 17.3%; p = 0.052), significantly shorter median intensive care unit (40 vs 107 hours; p < 0.001) and hospital (5 vs. 7 days; p < 0.001) length of stay (LOS), but similar postoperative stroke rates (7.7% vs 11.5%; p = 0.74). One-year unadjusted survival was 81.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 69.8% to 93.5%) in the TAVI group versus 71.2% (95% CI: 61.0% to 85.1%) in the SAVR group, p = 0.093. Cox proportional hazard modeling identified preoperative chronic kidney disease (hazard ratio: 2.63 [95% CI: 1.03 to 6.70]; p = 0.043) and SAVR (hazard ratio: 2.641 [95% CI: 1.07 to 6.51]; p = 0.035) as significant predictors for decreased survival. Overall, TAVI was associated with reduced operative mortality, increased survival, and shorter intensive care unit and hospital length of stay compared with SAVR in patients with porcelain aorta. This study demonstrates that TAVI is a safe intervention in this high-risk population.