Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Clin Croat ; 58(2): 365-370, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31819335

ABSTRACT

In the era of new molecular, epigenetic and proteomic discoveries, birth canal injuries seem like outdated discussion. A vast increase in the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) has been recorded in the last two decades despite advantages in modern medicine and new obstetric methods. This increase might be attributed to the new classification of perineal injury but also to the new imaging methods, including endoanal sonography, which earlier identifies injuries that previously were considered to be occult and actually underwent unrecognized, and which should have been recognized immediately postpartum. OASIS are third and fourth degree perineal injuries that occur during delivery. The reported incidence of OASIS varies from 0.1% to 10.9%. It is well known that third and fourth degree perineal injuries occur more often in primiparae, and in cases of macrosomic newborn, dorsoposterior position of fetal head and shoulder dystocia. The protective role of episiotomy is controversial. Birth canal injury during delivery can happen to any parturient woman. It is important for obstetricians to have this in mind at every delivery. Repercussions of OASIS are serious and can persist for life. They include emotional, psychological, social, physical and sexual disturbances. Therefore, it is very important to recognize the risk factors, diagnose the injury on time and treat it properly by a multidisciplinary team. Accordingly, it can be concluded that the increased incidence of OASIS is a result of better recognition of the risk factors, reduced rates of unrecognized sphincter injuries, adoption of the new classification and better postpartum imagining methods for detection of occult injuries.


Subject(s)
Anal Canal/injuries , Lacerations/epidemiology , Parturition , Perineum/injuries , Quality of Health Care , Episiotomy , Female , Humans , Incidence , Lacerations/diagnostic imaging , Lacerations/prevention & control , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Ultrasonography
2.
Acta Clin Croat ; 57(1): 149-156, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30256024

ABSTRACT

The aim of the review is to establish sexual and reproductive functions in men with spinal cord lesion (SCL). Many sexual and reproductive dysfunctions may be found in these patients including individual's low self-esteem, delay of orgasm, erectile or ejaculatory disorder and abnormalities of semen, which are characterized by lower sperm motility or viability. Owing to improvements in physical medicine and rehabilitation, the focus has been shifted from keeping patients alive towards ensuring the quality of life and improvements of sexual dysfunctions and later reproduction. Erectile dysfunction can be treated by using phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, intracavernosal injections, vacuum devices and penile prostheses. Semen can be retrieved from anejaculatory patients by medically assisted methods utilizing penile vibratory stimulation, electroejaculation, prostate mas-sage, or surgically. Although there is low chance for pregnancy in natural way in most of SCL pa-tients, fatherhood is possible through the introduction of assisted medical management. By use of various medical, technical and surgical procedures for sperm retrieval combined with assisted reproductive methods, high pregnancy rates have been reported comparable to those in able-bodied subfertile patients. Nevertheless, future studies are needed to improve semen quality and methods of assisted ejaculation in patients with SCL.


Subject(s)
Infertility, Male , Semen Analysis , Spinal Cord Injuries , Female , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Quality of Life , Sperm Motility
3.
Open Access Maced J Med Sci ; 6(6): 1067-1071, 2018 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29983803

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) includes the third and fourth degree of perineal injury. The risk for OASIS is about 1% of all vaginal deliveries. If not recognised and treated properly, obstetric anal sphincter injury can have serious consequences for reproductive age woman. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have retrospectively gathered and analysed data on obstetric anal sphincter injury in a four-year period at our department. The control group in this study included vaginal deliveries in 2012. RESULTS: We recorded 0.34% third and fourth degree of perineal injury in all vaginal deliveries, and 87.9% of those patients were primiparae. Episiotomy was performed in 57.6% of all women with obstetric anal sphincter injury. In 30.3% of cases, newborns were large for gestational age. Gestational diabetes was found in 9.1% of OASIS cases, occipitoposterior position was found in 9.1% of cases. Induced labour took place in 39.4%, and oxytocin infusion was applied in 60.6% of OASIS cases. Vacuum extraction was performed in 12.1% of deliveries with OASIS. The average BMI in 3a and 3b injuries was 29.9. In 3c degree it was 28.0, and in the fourth degree, it was 32.1. In 27.0% of OASIS cases due to the extent of the injury surgeon engagement was necessary. When compared with vaginal deliveries in 2012 we found a significant increase in OASIS in primiparas, large for gestational age, occipitoposterior position, induced labour, vacuum extraction and hypertension (P < 0.01). There is also increased incidence of OASIS in episiotomy and oxytocin use group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Low incidence of OASIS in our department is a result of active management of delivery, manual perineal protection and timely episiotomy.

4.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 34(3): 184-188, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29037105

ABSTRACT

The aim of this review is to analyze the role of obesity on fertility outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with respect to clinical or live birth rates and pregnancy loss rates. Despite findings from several earlier and newer studies that obesity does not adversely affect pregnancy outcome in women attempting conception, numerous reports from mostly recent studies suggest that obesity undoubtedly impairs IVF outcomes. Obesity impairs ovarian responsiveness to gonadotrophin stimulation, requiring higher doses of medication, increased risk of cycle cancelation, pre-term delivery, low birth weight or miscarriage, and decreases implantation, clinical pregnancy or live birth rates compared to women of normal weight. The mechanisms underlying the adverse effects of female obesity on IVF outcome may be primarily explained by functional alterations to the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis. Additionally, obesity appears to affect deleteriously the number and quality of oocytes or embryos, and impairs endometrial decidualization which is necessary for uterine receptivity. Nevertheless, attaining normal body weight by the use of lifestyle modifications, including a healthy diet and exercise over time of several months before and during an IVF treatment, may be successful in achievement of gradual and sustainable weight loss with improvement of IVF outcome.


Subject(s)
Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Obesity , Ovulation Induction/methods , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Rate , Embryo Implantation , Female , Fertility , Humans , Pregnancy
5.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol ; 56(6): 719-724, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29241908

ABSTRACT

The role of macroprolactinemia in women with hyperprolactinemia is currently controversial and can lead to clinical dilemmas, depending upon the origin of macroprolactin, the presence of hyperprolactinemic symptoms and monomeric prolactin (PRL) levels. Macroprolactinemia is mostly considered an extrapituitary phenomenon of mild and asymptomatic hyperprolactinemia associated with normal concentrations of monomeric PRL and a predominance of macroprolactin confined to the vascular system, which is biologically inactive. Patients can therefore be reassured that macroprolactinemia should be considered a benign clinical condition, resistant to antiprolactinemic drugs, and that no diagnostic investigations or prolonged follow-up should be necessary. However, a significant proportion of macroprolactinemic patients appears to suffer from hyperprolactinemia-related symptoms and radiological pituitary findings commonly associated with true hyperprolactinemia. The symptoms of hyperprolactinemia are correlated to the levels of monomeric PRL excess, which may be explained as coincidental, by dissociation of macroprolactin, or by physiological, pharmacological and pathological causes. The excess of monomeric PRL levels in such cases is of primarily importance and the diagnosis of macroprolactinemia is misleading or inadequate. However, macroprolactinemia of pituitary origin associated with radiological findings of pituitary adenomas may rarely occur with similar hyperprolactinemic manifestations, exclusively due to bioactivity of macroprolactin. Therefore, in such cases with hyperprolactinemic signs and pituitary findings, macroprolactinemia should be considered a pathological biochemical condition of hyperprolactinemia. Accordingly, individualized diagnostic investigations with the introduction of dopamine agonists, or other treatment with prolonged follow-up, should be mandatory. The review analyses the laboratory and clinical significance of macroprolactinemia in hyperprolactinemic women suggesting clinically useful diagnostic and treatment strategies.


Subject(s)
Hyperprolactinemia/blood , Prolactin/blood , Adenoma/diagnosis , Adenoma/etiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Hyperprolactinemia/complications , Hyperprolactinemia/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Pituitary Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pituitary Neoplasms/etiology , Symptom Assessment
6.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 33(8): 583-587, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28393578

ABSTRACT

The aim of this review is to analyse the effectiveness of exogenous kisspeptin administration as a novel alternative of triggering oocyte maturation, instead of currently used triggers such as human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment. Kisspeptin has been considered a master regulator of two modes of GnRH and hence gonadotropin secretion, pulses and surges. Administration of kisspeptin-10 and kisspeptin-54 induces the luteinising hormone (LH) surge required for egg maturation and ovulation in animal investigations and LH release during the preovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle and hypothalamic amenorrhoea in humans. Exogenous kisspeptin-54 has been successfully administered as a promising method of triggering oocyte maturation, following ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins and GnRH antagonists in women undergoing IVF, due to its efficacy considering achieved pregnancy rates compared to hCG and GnRH agonists. Also, its safety in patients at high risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is noteworthy. Nevertheless, further studies would be desirable to establish the optimal trigger of egg maturation and to improve the reproductive outcome for women undergoing IVF treatment.


Subject(s)
Fertility Agents, Female/therapeutic use , Fertilization in Vitro , Infertility, Female/therapy , Kisspeptins/therapeutic use , Oogenesis/drug effects , Ovulation Induction , Adult , Animals , Female , Fertility Agents, Female/adverse effects , Fertility Agents, Female/metabolism , Fertilization in Vitro/adverse effects , Humans , Kisspeptins/adverse effects , Kisspeptins/genetics , Kisspeptins/metabolism , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/chemically induced , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/epidemiology , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/prevention & control , Ovulation/drug effects , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Peptide Fragments/adverse effects , Peptide Fragments/genetics , Peptide Fragments/metabolism , Peptide Fragments/therapeutic use , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Recombinant Proteins/adverse effects , Recombinant Proteins/metabolism , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Risk
7.
Acta Clin Croat ; 55(3): 453-458, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29045772

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this review is to present contemporary measures for preventing the increase in preovulatory progesterone (P) and its adverse effects on ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization (IVF). For the last 20 years, the increase of preovulatory P has been a topic of numerous discussions because its role is not fully understood in terms of its impact on pregnancy outcome after IVF. Some studies failed to establish a connection between the preovulatory P increase and successful IVF outcome regardless of the level of P, while, conversely, most other studies have reported on adverse effects of elevated P concentrations. Current strategies to prevent the increase in preovulatory P include an individualized approach with the use of mild stimulation protocols and early application of human chorionic gonadotropin for ovulation induction among good responders, delay in the transfer of fresh embryos from 3rd to 5th day, and cryopreservation of all embryos with the thawed embryo transfer in the natural cycle. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to confirm the current preventive methods or enable the application of new strategies in order to lower or eliminate the detrimental effects of preovulatory P rise during ovarian stimulation in IVF.


Subject(s)
Fertilization in Vitro , Ovulation Induction , Progesterone/blood , Adult , Chorionic Gonadotropin/blood , Female , Follicular Phase/drug effects , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...