Dynamics of Plasmodium species and genotype diversity in adults with asymptomatic infection in Gabon.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the diversity and dynamics of Plasmodium infection in serially collected samples from asymptomatic participants of a clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of ivermectin in Gabon. We checked whether the baseline sample reflected the P. falciparum genotype and Plasmodium species diversity seen over 7 days of follow-up. METHODS: Blood samples were collected at inclusion, every 8 hours until hour 72, daily until day 7, and on day 14. Plasmodium species was determined by qPCR and pfmsp1 length polymorphism was assessed for P. falciparum genotyping. RESULTS: In 17/48 (35%) individuals, all pfmsp1 genotypes identified during the assessed period were detected at baseline; in 31/48 (65%), new genotypes were found during follow-up. Additional sampling at hour 24 allowed the identification of all genotypes seen over 7 days in 50% of the individuals. Ivermectin did not impact the genotype dynamics. Mixed Plasmodium spp. infections were detected in 28/49 (57%) individuals at baseline, and detection of non-falciparum infections during follow-up varied. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal complex intra-host dynamics of P. falciparum genotypes and Plasmodium species and underscore the importance of serial sampling in clinical trials for antimalarial drugs with asymptomatically P. falciparum-infected individuals. This might allow a more accurate identification of genotypes in multiple infections, impacting the assessment of drug efficacy.

Efficacy and safety of ivermectin for the treatment of Plasmodium falciparum infections in asymptomatic male and female Gabonese adults - a pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single-centre phase Ib/IIa clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Ivermectin's mosquitocidal effect and in vitro activity against Plasmodium falciparum asexual stages are known. Its in vivo blood-schizonticidal efficacy is unknown. Ivermectin's tolerability and efficacy against P. falciparum infections in Gabonese adults were assessed. METHODS: The study consisted of a multiple dose stage and a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled stage. Adults with asymptomatic P. falciparum parasitaemia (200-5000 parasites/µl) were enrolled. First, three groups of five participants received 200 µg/kg ivermectin once daily for one, two, and three days, respectively, and then 34 participants were randomized to 300 µg/kg ivermectin or placebo once daily for 3 days. Primary efficacy outcome was time to 90% parasite reduction. Primary safety outcomes were drug-related serious and severe adverse events (Trial registration: PACTR201908520097051). FINDINGS: Between June 2019 and October 2020, 49 participants were enrolled. Out of the 34 randomized participants, 29 (85%) completed the trial as per protocol. No severe or serious adverse events were observed. The median time to 90% parasite reduction was 24.1 vs. 32.0 h in the ivermectin and placebo groups, respectively (HR 1.38 [95% CI 0.64 to 2.97]). INTERPRETATION: Ivermectin was well tolerated in doses up to 300 µg/kg once daily for three days and asymptomatic P. falciparum asexual parasitaemia was reduced similarly with this dose of ivermectin compared to placebo. Further studies are needed to evaluate plasmodicidal effect of ivermectin at higher doses and in larger samples. FUNDING: This study was funded by the Centre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné and the Centre for Tropical Medicine of the Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of albendazole and ivermectin based regimens for the treatment of microfilaraemic loiasis in adult patients in Gabon: A randomized controlled assessor blinded clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of systematic evidence for strategies to control loiasis transmission in highly endemic regions. Here we assessed albendazole and ivermectin based treatment regimens to reduce Loa loa microfilaraemia in Gabon. METHODS: Eligible adult patients with L. loa microfilaraemia between 5,000 and 50,000 microfilariae/ml were randomized to either a control or one of three intervention groups (1:2:2:2 allocation ratio) consisting of three-week twice daily 400mg oral albendazole followed by 1) no treatment, 2) two further weeks of twice daily 400mg albendazole, or 3) a single dose of ivermectin in this open label randomized assessor blinded controlled clinical trial. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with L. loa microfilaraemia ≤ 100 mf/ml at Day 168. RESULTS: In the efficacy-population of 42 patients 0 (0%; control group), 1 (9%; 3-week albendazole), 5 (39%; 5-weeks albendazole) and 2 (22%; 3-week albendazole plus single dose ivermectin) participants met the primary outcome of microfilaraemia below 100/ml at day 168. A 80-90% reduction of microfilaraemia was observed in the active treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The 5-week regimen of albendazole or a 3-week regimen of albendazole followed by ivermectin were most efficacious to reduce microfilaraemia. All therapeutic regimens were well tolerated and safe. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered at the Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry: PACTR201807197019027.

Performance of Field's Stain Compared with Conventional Giemsa Stain for the Rapid Detection of Blood Microfilariae in Gabon.

Filarial infections caused by Loa loa and Mansonella perstans are a considerable public health burden in rural regions of Central Africa. Rapid diagnostic tools for the detection of microfilariae in the blood are needed. Field's stain is a rapid staining technique for microscopic slides originally established for malaria diagnostics. It requires less than 1 minute of staining compared with conventional staining protocols requiring at least 15 to 20 minutes for staining and could thus significantly accelerate diagnostics for human filariasis. Here we evaluated Field's stain as a rapid staining technique in comparison to Giemsa stain for the detection of microfilariae in peripheral blood. Blood smears were collected from 175 participants residing in the region of Lambaréné and Fougamou, Gabon. Each participant's samples were stained in parallel with Field's stain and conventional Giemsa stain. Slides were then microscopically assessed and compared for qualitative and quantitative results by a blinded assessor for the two endemic filarial blood pathogens M. perstans and L. loa. Field's stain shows excellent diagnostic performance characteristics for L. loa microfilariae compared with Giemsa staining. Concordance was favorable for M. perstans although lower than for L. loa. Field's stain offers a rapid alternative to Giemsa stain for detection of L. loa microfilariae in thick blood smears. This could help accelerate diagnostics of blood filarial pathogens in mass screening programs or resource constrained health care institutions with high patient load.

Diagnostic performance of capillary and venous blood samples in the detection of Loa loa and Mansonella perstans microfilaraemia using light microscopy.

BACKGROUND: Loa loa and Mansonella perstans-the causative agents of loiasis and mansonellosis-are vector-borne filarial parasites co-endemic in sub-Saharan Africa. Diagnosis of both infections is usually established by microscopic analysis of blood samples. It was recently established that the odds for detecting Plasmodium spp. is higher in capillary (CAP) blood than in venous (VEN) blood. In analogy to this finding this analysis evaluates potential differences in microfilaraemia of L. loa and M. perstans in samples of CAP and VEN blood. METHODS: Recruitment took place between 2015 and 2019 at the CERMEL in Lambaréné, Gabon and its surrounding villages. Persons of all ages presenting to diagnostic services of the research center around noon were invited to participate in the study. A thick smear of each 10 microliters of CAP and VEN blood was prepared and analysed by a minimum of two independent microscopists. Differences of log2-transformed CAP and VEN microfilaraemia were computed and expressed as percentages. Furthermore, odds ratios for paired data were computed to quantify the odds to detect microfilariae in CAP blood versus in VEN blood. RESULTS: A total of 713 participants were recruited among whom 52% were below 30 years of age, 27% between 30-59 years of age and 21% above 60 years of age. Male-female ratio was 0.84. Among 152 participants with microscopically-confirmed L. loa infection median (IQR) microfilaraemia was 3,650 (275-11,100) per milliliter blood in CAP blood and 2,775 (200-8,875) in VEN blood (p<0.0001), while among 102 participants with M. perstans this was 100 (0-200) and 100 (0-200), respectively (p = 0.44). Differences in linear models amount up to an average of +34.5% (95% CI: +11.0 to +63.0) higher L. loa microfilaria quantity in CAP blood versus VEN blood and for M. perstans it was on average higher by +24.8% (95% CI: +0.0 to +60.5). Concordantly, the odds for detection of microfilaraemia in CAP samples versus VEN samples was 1.24 (95% CI: 0.65-2.34) and 1.65 (95% CI: 1.0-2.68) for infections with L. loa and M. perstans, respectively. CONCLUSION: This analysis indicates that average levels of microfilaraemia of L. loa are higher in CAP blood samples than in VEN blood samples. This might have implications for treatment algorithms of onchocerciasis and loiasis, in which exact quantification of L. loa microfilaraemia is of importance. Furthermore, the odds for detection of M. perstans microfilariae was higher in CAP than in VEN blood which may pre-dispose CAP blood for detection of M. perstans infection in large epidemiological studies when sampling of large blood quantities is not feasible. No solid evidence for a higher odds of L. loa microfilariae detection in CAP blood was revealed, which might be explained by generally high levels of L. loa microfilaraemia in CAP and VEN blood above the limit of detection of 100 microfilariae/ml. Yet, it cannot be excluded that the study was underpowered to detect a moderate difference.