Habitual behavioural control moderates the relation between daily perceived stress and purging.

OBJECTIVE: Evidence suggests that interpersonal stress plays a role in maintaining binge eating and purging (e.g., self-induced vomiting, misuse of laxatives). Stress is especially likely to promote engagement in maladaptive behaviour if the behaviour is habitual; therefore, individuals whose binge eating and/or purging are habitual may be particularly likely to engage in these behaviours in the context of interpersonal stress. We aimed to investigate this hypothesis in a sample of women with binge eating and/or purging using ecological momentary assessment (EMA). METHOD: Women (N = 81) with binge-eating and/or purging symptoms completed a self-report measure assessing habit strength of binge eating and purging followed by a 14-day EMA protocol assessing daily perceived interpersonal stress and binge-eating and purging episodes. RESULTS: Habit strength of purging moderated the within-person effect of interpersonal stress on purging frequency, such that higher daily stress was associated with greater same-day purging frequency when purging was more habitual. Contrary to expectations, the interactive effect of habit strength of binge eating and daily interpersonal stress on same-day binge-eating frequency was non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that individuals with habitual purging may be vulnerable to engaging in purging when they are experiencing high levels of interpersonal stress.

Implementation Barriers and Experiences of Eligible Patients Who Failed to Enroll in Collaborative Care for Depression and Anxiety.

BACKGROUND: Effective and efficient implementation of the Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) for depression and anxiety is imperative for program success. Studies examining barriers to implementation often omit patient perspectives. OBJECTIVES: To explore experiences and attitudes of eligible patients referred to CoCM who declined participation or were unable to be reached, and identify implementation barriers to inform strategies. DESIGN: Convergent mixed-methods study with a survey and interview. PARTICIPANTS: Primary care patients at an academic medical center who were referred to a CoCM program for anxiety and depression by their primary care clinician (PCC) but declined participation or were unable to be reached by the behavioral health care manager to initiate care (n = 80). Interviews were conducted with 45 survey respondents. MAIN MEASURES: Survey of patients' referral experiences and behavioral health preferences as they related to failing to enroll in the program. Interview questions were developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research version 2.0 (CFIR 2.0) to identify implementation barriers to enrollment. KEY RESULTS: Survey results found that patients were uncertain about insurance coverage, did not understand the program, and felt services were not necessary. Referred patients who declined participation were concerned about how their mental health information would be used and preferred treatment without medication. Men agreed more that they did not need services. Qualitative results exhibited a variety of implementation determinants (n = 23) across the five CFIR 2.0 domains. Barriers included mental health stigma, perceiving behavioral health as outside of primary care practice guidelines, short or infrequent primary care appointments, prioritizing physical health over mental health, receiving inaccurate program information, low motivation to engage, and a less established relationship with their PCC. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple barriers to enrollment led to failing to link patients to care, which can inform implementation strategies to address the patient-reported experiences and concerns.

The efficacy, safety, and outcomes of testosterone use among transgender men patients: A review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Gender dysphoria is the discrepancy between biological sex and gender identity. This can be debilitating for transgender populations, including transgender men (TM), individuals who were assigned female at birth but who identify as men, that can benefit from hormonal therapy with testosterone products to address gender dysphoria. METHODS: We aim to summarize the efficacy, safety profile, and outcomes of the different testosterone replacement treatment (TRT) in the TM population. A search of the published literature regarding the various FDA-approved TRT was performed in PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from 2007 to date. RESULTS: We complied two groups of TRT based on route of administration including the conventional testosterone therapies (intramuscular and subcutaneous injectables, and transdermal gels) and newer testosterone therapies (oral, buccal, and nasal gels). For the conventional testosterone therapies, we identified nine studies discussed conventional TRT in TM population including one randomized trial, four prospective studies, one retrospective study and three reviews. For newer testosterone therapies, we identified three studies discussed newer TRT in TM population including one prospective study and two reviews. Articles were then compiled and analyzed. Albeit majority of TRT data stemming from conventional TRT, there appear to be an overwhelmingly safety and efficacy profile in TM population translated with increased free testosterone levels comparable to male range, menses cessation, anxiety/depression decline and improved quality of life. CONCLUSION: Testosterone therapy can be impactful for TM population with improved safety, efficiency, quality of life and function. With the rise of the newer FDA-approved TRT, randomized studies are warranted to determine its safety and efficacity in this TM population.