Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Dermatol Venereol ; 151(2): 103264, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537431

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Following the RITUX 3 therapeutic trial, the French national diagnosis and care protocol (NDCP) for the treatment of pemphigus was updated in 2018. The updated protocol recommends initial treatment with rituximab (RTX) followed by maintenance therapy at 12 and 18 months, and potentially at 6 months where there are risk factors for early relapse. We evaluated these recommendations regarding the management of our own patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our single-center retrospective study included all patients with pemphigus diagnosed between 01/2015 and 10/2020 and receiving at least one initial infusion of RTX. We collected the following data: type of pemphigus, severity, levels of anti-desmoglein 1 and 3 antibodies at diagnosis and between 2 and 6 months after initial RTX, presence or absence of maintenance therapy and modalities, time to first relapse and duration of associated systemic corticosteroid therapy ≥5 mg/day. Maintenance treatment modalities were as follows: no maintenance treatment, maintenance "on demand" (MT1) i.e. not performed at the rate imposed by the NDCP, and maintenance "according to NDCP" (MT2). RESULTS: Fifty patients were included (women 54%, median age 58 years, pemphigus vulgaris 68%, moderate to severe 68%). Initial RTX was combined with systemic corticosteroid therapy at 0.5 to 1 mg/kg in 74% of cases. Twenty-seven patients (54%) received no maintenance therapy, 13 were on an MT1 regimen (26%), and 10 were on an MT2 regimen (20%). Median follow-up was 42 months. At the last follow-up, 39 patients (78%) were in complete remission. A total of 25 patients (50%) relapsed: 18/27 (67%) patients without maintenance, 5/13 (38%) with MT1, and 2/10 (20%) with MT2 (p = 0.026). The probability of relapse over time was significantly lower in patients receiving maintenance therapy compared to those who receiving none (p = 0.022). The median time to relapse was 15 months in patients without maintenance, and 30 and 28 in those with maintenance (p = 0.27). The median duration of systemic corticosteroid therapy ≥ 5 mg/day in the no-maintenance group was 10 months, compared to 7 and 9 months respectively in MT1 and MT2 (p = 0.91). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the value of RTX maintenance therapy in pemphigus in real life.


Subject(s)
Maintenance Chemotherapy , Pemphigus , Recurrence , Rituximab , Humans , Pemphigus/drug therapy , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Rituximab/administration & dosage , Female , Retrospective Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Immunologic Factors/administration & dosage , Desmoglein 1/immunology , Desmoglein 3/immunology
2.
Vaccine ; 39(25): 3315-3318, 2021 06 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34011464

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is frequent and can constitute a barrier to the dissemination of vaccines once they are available. Unequal access to vaccines may also contribute to socioeconomic inequalities with regard to COVID-19. We studied vaccine hesitancy among persons living in homeless shelters in France between May and June 2020 (n = 235). Overall, 40.9% of study participants reported vaccine hesitancy, which is comparable to general population trends in France. In multivariate regression models, factors associated with vaccine hesitancy are: being a woman (OR = 2.55; 95% CI 1.40-4.74), living with a partner (OR = 2.48, 95% CI 1.17-5.41), no legal residence in France (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.27-0.92), and health literacy (OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.21, 0.68). Our results suggest that trends in vaccine hesitancy and associated factors are similar among homeless persons as in the general population. Dissemination of information on vaccine risks and benefits needs to be adapted to persons who experience severe disadvantage.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ill-Housed Persons , Vaccines , COVID-19 Vaccines , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Ann Hum Biol ; 40(5): 451-8, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23777297

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Validation of body adiposity index (BAI) in a paediatrics sample; and to develop, if necessary, a valid BAI for paediatrics (i.e. BAIp). METHODS: A total of 1615 children (52% boys) aged 5-12 years underwent anthropometry. Their body composition was assessed using a foot-to-foot bioimpedance. The validity of BAI = (Hip circumference/Height(1.5)) - 18 was tested by combining correlation and agreement statistics. Then, the sample was split into two sub-samples for the construction of BAIp. A regression was used to compute the prediction equation for BAIp-based percentage of body fat (%BF). RESULTS: The initial BAI over-estimated the %BF of children by 49% (29.6 ± 4.2% versus 19.8 ± 6.8%; p < 0.0001). The original methodology led to a BAIp = (Hip circumference/Height(0.8)) - 38 in children. When compared to BAI, BAIp showed both better correlation (r = 0.57; p < 0.01 versus r = 0.74; p < 0.0001) and agreement (ICC = 0.34; [95% CI = -0.19-0.65] versus ICC = 0.83; [95% CI = 0.81-0.84]). However, there were some systematic biases between the two values of %BF as exemplified by the large 95% limit of agreement [-9.1%; 8.8%] obtained. CONCLUSION: BAI over-estimates the %BF in children. In contrast, BAIp appears as a new index for children's body fatness, with acceptable accuracy. In its current form, this index is valid only for large-scale studies.


Subject(s)
Adiposity , Anthropometry/methods , Electric Impedance , Body Composition , Body Mass Index , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , France , Humans , Male , Regression Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...