Child marriage of female Syrian refugees in Jordan and Lebanon: a literature review.

BACKGROUND: The Syrian conflict has resulted in major humanitarian crises. The risk is particularly high amongst female children who face additional gendered risks, such as harassment and sexual violence, including a rise in prevalence of child marriage. Despite the importance of this topic, current literature remains relatively scarce. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to explore the social and healthcare repercussions of Syrian refugee child marriages in Jordan and Lebanon. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was carried out to gather evidence, from a total of eight articles. Data analysis was conducted using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme check tool to systematically assess the trustworthiness, relevance and results of the included papers. RESULTS: The findings of this research identify tradition, honour, economics, fear, and protection-related factors as drivers of child marriage of refugees in Jordan and Lebanon. These motives overlap with findings regarding access to reproductive health and reproductive rights. The lack of autonomy of the child to give informed consent is augmented in the context of protracted violence and displacement. CONCLUSION: There is a need for a holistic approach to provide safe spaces, education, and protection to young girls and their families to reduce their acceptance of child marriage.

Healthcare services for Syrian refugees in Jordan: a systematic review.

Background: This review aims to explore the healthcare needs and access to healthcare services among Syrian refugees in Jordan. Furthermore, it identifies possible ways of responding to such needs within the framework of the structural challenges faced in this particular context. Methods: Through qualitative techniques, this study systematically reviewed nine articles identified in academic and international organizations' databases. Six articles are from scholarly sources, while three are published reports or commentary articles; thus, there are variations in methodological rigour. An analysis of the articles was performed based on the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme check tool to systematically assess the trustworthiness, relevance and results of the included papers. Results: The overall access to healthcare is relatively good for most registered Syrian refugees. However, some groups lack access due to financial and structural barriers, such as not possessing the appropriate civil documentation and/or not having the means to pay out-of-pocket expenses to access adequate services. A key challenge relates to access of inpatient care. Accessing care for non-communicable/chronic diseases requires not only legal documentation but also long-term access and continuity of care in an already overburdened health care system. Conclusion: The healthcare needs of the refugee, as well as the host population in Jordan, cannot be adequately met without the international society acknowledging a collective responsibility, including a financial commitment. One effort that could solve a major structural problem for those not able to access healthcare is increased flexibility in regards to documentation.