Pleomorphic adenoma of the nasal septum.

INTRODUCTION: Pleomorphic adenoma is the most common benign tumour of the salivary glands. The major salivary glands are most commonly involved, or more rarely accessory salivary glands, especially the oral cavity. Other locations, such as the nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses or upper aerodigestive tract, are exceptional. CASE REPORT: A 26-year-old female presented with right-sided nasal obstruction. Radiology found a lesion involving the anterior third of the nasal septum. The patient underwent complete surgical resection of the tumour via an endonasal approach. Histological examination found a mixed cellular component (epithelial and myoepithelial) and mesenchymatous tissue with chondromyxoid stroma, enabling diagnosis of a typical pleomorphic adenoma. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Pleomorphic adenoma is exceptional in the nasal cavity, with only a few cases reported in the literature. Although benign, the risk of local recurrence, malignant transformation and metastasis requires close long-term follow-up.

Prospective comparison of FDG and FET PET/CT in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

AIM: The clinical usefulness of 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is now well-documented. However, its sensitivity is greater than its specificity due to false-positive results in inflammatory or infectious lesions, which are frequent in this area, in particular after treatment by surgery and/or radiotherapy. O-2-fluoro-(18F)-ethyl-L-thyrosine (FET) has been reported not to be taken up by such lesions, and a preliminary study indicated that this may be clinically useful in HNSCC. We performed a prospective study to compare the diagnostic performances of FDG and FET PET/CT in the different settings of HNSCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (20 men and seven women, aged 48-76, among 30 patients included) and 69 suspected cancer sites are now evaluable on basis of postsurgical histology and/or follow-up greater than 6 months; 15 patients were referred for initial staging and 12 during posttherapy follow-up, a recurrence being suspected in eight of them. FDG and FET PET/CT were performed on two different days, the patient fasting for 6 h, 1 h after injection of 5 MBq/kg of body mass of each radiopharmaceutical. Both PET/CT examinations were blind read more than 6 months after the end of inclusions in a random order for each tracer and with a time interval greater than 1 month between FDG and FET PET/CT blind readings. RESULTS: Overall diagnostic performances, derived from blind reading: FDG PET/CT on a per patient basis: sensitivity 100%, specificity 71%, accuracy 93%; FDG PET/CT on a per site basis: sensitivity 95%, specificity 63%, accuracy 83%; FET PET/CT on a per patient basis: sensitivity 70%, specificity 100%, accuracy 78%; FET PET/CT on a per site basis: sensitivity 64%, specificity 100%, accuracy 78%. At site level, sensitivity was significantly greater with FDG (p<0.02) and specificity with FET (p<0.01). The statistical level of significance was not reached at patient level. CONCLUSION: Although its good specificity was confirmed, FET did not appear to be suited as a first-line PET tracer in HNSCC imaging and cannot replace FDG for staging due to insufficient sensitivity. However, it was useful in a few selected cases to favor a wait and see attitude when a FDG+ FET- focus was discovered in patients referred for systematic FDG PET during follow-up. In contrast, second primary cancers should not be ruled out if FDG was clearly positive in the lungs or the digestive tract.