Serum Matrix Metalloproteinase-7 is an independent prognostic biomarker in advanced bladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: Urine markers have been studied extensively but there is a lack of blood prognostic markers in bladder cancer. MMP-7 is produced by stromal cells and by tumor cells and is overexpressed in a variety of epithelial and mesenchymal tumors. In this study, we assessed with an immunoassay we developed, the prognostic value of serum MMP-7 in a series of patients with advanced bladder cancer. METHODS: Serum samples were collected from 56 patients with advanced bladder cancer who were treated at the Montpellier Cancer Institute between March 2003 and December 2004. MMP-7 was quantified in serum samples by using a homogeneous sandwich fluoroimmunoassay we developed based on the time resolved amplified cryptate emission (TRACE) technology. RESULTS: The median overall survival of the study population was 2.2 years (95% CI, 1.4 to 3.0) with 1- and 5-year survival rates of 73% (95% CI, 59% to 82%) and 25% (95% CI, 14% to 37%), respectively. High MMP-7 serum levels were associated with poor survival. Using a cut-off value of 11.5 ng/mL, the median overall survival was 3.0 years (95% CI, 1.5 to 5.1) for patients with MMP-7 serum level <11.5 ng/mL and 1.3 years (95% CI, 0.8 to 2.5) for patients with serum level ?11.5 ng/mL. Multivariate analysis identified high MMP-7 serum concentration as an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with advanced bladder cancer (R?=?2.1, 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.4). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the MMP-7 serum concentration is an independent prognostic factor in patients with locally advanced and or metastatic bladder cancer.

Determination of EGFR status in gliomas: usefulness of immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is produced during the molecular pathogenesis of glioma, and new anti-EGFR molecules are available for therapeutics. Consequently, analyses of the EGFR gene and protein are frequently used for glioma characterization. We compare the accuracy and the usefulness of 2 currently used techniques for histologic classification of gliomas. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) techniques were used to assess EGFR gene amplification and protein abundance in a series of 35 gliomas, including World Health Organization (WHO) grade I, II, and III astrocytomas (AI, AII, AIII), grade II and III tumors with oligodendroglial component (OII, OIII) and grade IV glioblastomas (GBs). EGFR gene amplification was found in one-third of the tumors studied. It was frequent in GB and OIII but was never found in AI, AII, AIII, and OII tumors. IHC and FISH provided similar findings for grade of tumor, despite the fact that, in contrast to the FISH gene amplification, EGFR protein was overexpressed in AIII and in GB. EGFR gene amplification was never observed in tumors not containing EGFR protein: therefore FISH is unnecessary when IHC shows no EGFR protein expression. EGFR gene amplification seems to be restricted to high-grade tumors, WHO grade IV astrocytomas, and grade III oligodendroglial tumors.

Docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with metastatic androgen independent prostate cancer and circulating neuroendocrine markers.

PURPOSE: A link between neuroendocrine cell differentiation and resistance to androgen deprivation has been observed in prostate cancer, suggesting the possible efficacy of specific treatments. We assessed the efficacy and toxicity of a chemotherapy regimen combining docetaxel and cisplatin in men with androgen independent prostatic adenocarcinoma and circulating neuroendocrine markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 41 patients were treated with a combination of 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel and 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles. The primary study end point was the neuroendocrine response rate, defined as a decrease in neuron specific enolase and/or chromogranin A to 50% or greater of the supranormal baseline serum value. Median followup was 40 months. RESULTS: A median of 6 cycles per patient was delivered. A neuroendocrine response was observed in 13 patients (33%). The median response duration was 4 months (range 2 to 10). The prostate specific antigen response rate was 48%. A clinical benefit was observed in 45% of patients who required analgesics at study entry. The objective response rate was 41% in 29 patients with measurable metastases. Five patients had to stop therapy due to toxicity. The main side effects were cumulative asthenia and sensitive neuropathy. Median survival was 12 months (range 1 to 38). CONCLUSIONS: Regarding the disappointing efficacy and significant toxicity observed in this study, the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin cannot be recommended in daily practice. Further studies are necessary to determine whether patients with circulating neuroendocrine markers require specific therapeutic approaches.

[What is the objective of second-line chemotherapy after failure of first-line chemotherapy in hormone-resistant metastatic prostate?]. / Chimiothérapie de deuxième ligne après échec d'une chimiothérapie de première ligne dans le cancer de la prostate métastatique hormono-résistant. Pour quel objectif?

UNLABELLED: Chemotherapy occupies an increasingly important place in the management of hormone-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. For the first time in this disease, docetaxel increases the survival of patients, with a modest, but definite median gain of about 2 months. In everyday practice, the indication for second-line chemotherapy after immediate or delayed failure of first-line chemotherapy is sometimes considered, although objective data concerning its efficacy are limited. The objective of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate the results obtained with second-line chemotherapy in a patient cohort managed at the Montpellier Regional Cancer Centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical characteristics, treatments delivered and outcome of 43 patients who received two successive lines of chemotherapy were retrospectively collected by means of a standardized questionnaire. Three groups of patients were defined as a function of the chemotherapy protocols delivered: docetaxel alone or in combination, mitoxantrone and other protocols not comprising either docetaxel or mitoxantrone. Responses to chemotherapy were analysed according to three criteria: objective responses, laboratory responses and palliative responses. RESULTS: At the time of second-line chemotherapy, the median age of the patients was 69 years (range: 46 to 83). The median interval between the end of first-line chemotherapy and the start of second-line chemotherapy was 3 months (range: 1 to 15). The protocols administered comprised docetaxel alone (12 patients) or in combination with cisplatin (4 patients), mitoxantrone in 13 patients, or other cytotoxic molecules such as vinblastine, doxorubicin or etoposide in combination with a platinum salt (14 patients). The median number of cycles delivered was 4 (range: 1 to 10). No objective response was observed. Six (14%) patients obtained a laboratory response. A palliative response was observed in 16 (37%) patients, 7 of whom were treated with a docetaxel-based protocol, 6 were treated with mitoxantrone and 3 were treated by other protocols. The median duration of palliative response was 3 months (range: 1 to 6). The median survival was 8 months (range: 1 to 24), with no significant difference between the various protocols. CONCLUSION: In 2006, the objective of second-line chemotherapy in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer appears to be purely palliative. No reference protocol has been defined among currently available cytotoxic molecules. The indication must therefore take into account the benefit/risk balance to avoid compromising the patients quality of life. Therapeutic trials are essential to develop effective new molecules.