Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Case Rep Infect Dis ; 2022: 2252825, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35992576

ABSTRACT

Patients with solid organ transplant have weaker immune system and can develop opportunistic infections. Prophylactic antimicrobials can help lower that risk but do not prevent it completely. High index of suspicion increases the chance of diagnosing rare opportunistic infections in immunocompromised patients and helps early and effective treatment. We present a unique case of a patient who developed pneumonia from Nocardia early after kidney transplant despite being on trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) prophylaxis. He was diagnosed and treated early which helped improving his outcome. We discuss incidence, risk factors, and treatment of nocardiosis post kidney transplant.

2.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis ; 63(3): 194-209, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32205133

ABSTRACT

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV)-mediated by a heterogeneous myriad of immune and non-immune factors, which contribute to the progressive and diffuse thickening of the arterial allograft's tunica intima in one distinct form of CAV, and the build-up of plaque in another-is a major limiting factor of long-term survival post heart transplantation. Information on the optimal pharmacotherapeutic approaches for the prevention and management of CAV is conflicting, scattered, and inconsistent, with numerous recent studies adding to the literature. In this paper, we present a go-to clinical resource with the most updated and comprehensive information on the topic. Immunosuppressant therapy remains a staple, with mTOR inhibitors and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) showing direct correlation with CAV prevention. More data is now available with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) minimizing or sparing regimens. More novel approaches are being investigated for the roles of monoclonal antibodies, anti-thymocyte globulin, and bortezomib in preventing or delaying CAV. On the other hand, statins' established efficacy is attributed to lipid-lowering and lipid-independent immunomodulatory effects, with early initiation associated with improved outcomes. The choice of statin is dependent on drug-drug interactions. Other aiding approaches for the prevention of CAV include antioxidant vitamins, aspirin, vasodilators, folate therapy, and, most pertinently, cytomegalovirus prophylaxis. Larger clinical trials are needed before these options are institutionalised. For management of established CAV, early initiation of augmented immunosuppressive therapies may be effective, as well as CNI conversion to mTOR inhibitors with or without standard MMF and azathioprine therapy. Risk of acute rejection needs to be monitored during conversion. Finally, preclinical investigations highlight novel potential therapies for CAV prevention and attenuation, however robust clinical trials are needed to test their efficacy and safety.


Subject(s)
Heart Diseases/prevention & control , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Animals , Heart Diseases/epidemiology , Heart Diseases/immunology , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
Expert Rev Clin Immunol ; 11(5): 659-72, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25817258

ABSTRACT

The overall success of organ transplantation in the 21st century has been predicated, in part, on the use of newer, more potent, and selective immunosuppressive agents. However, the high cost of lifelong immunosuppression represents a financial burden for many patients. In the past 15 years, regulatory agencies in Europe and America have approved several generic immunosuppressants. One concern is whether the conversion between innovator and generic immunosuppressants will prove to be problematic. This manuscript aims to compare and contrast the bioequivalence requirements among regulatory authorities in the USA, Europe, and Canada, evaluate published studies of generic immunosuppressants in transplant recipients, summarize consensus statements made by transplant organizations and discuss how to engage patients in discussion regarding the choice between innovator and generic immunosuppressants.


Subject(s)
Drugs, Generic/therapeutic use , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Organ Transplantation , Therapies, Investigational , Animals , Canada , Consensus , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Drug and Narcotic Control , Drugs, Generic/economics , Drugs, Generic/pharmacokinetics , Europe , Humans , Immunosuppression Therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/economics , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacokinetics , Therapeutic Equivalency , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...