Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Chemother ; 29(5): 308-309, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27268065

ABSTRACT

Consensus treatment for herpetic meningoencephalitis is intravenous aciclovir but no guidelines are available for alternative treatment in case of renal failure induced by aciclovir. We report to the best of our knowledge, the first case of herpetic meningoencephalitis treated with success by ganciclovir.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Encephalitis, Herpes Simplex/drug therapy , Ganciclovir/therapeutic use , Acyclovir/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
2.
Presse Med ; 43(11): e365-8, 2014 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25201601

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Evaluate the impact of distribution of antimicrobial guidelines (AG) on anti-infectious prescriptions (AIP) in patients presenting a bacteraemia. Cost evaluation of AIP with and without intervention of an infectious disease specialist. METHODS: The first evaluation of AIP was performed from January to May 2008 in Douai hospital, France, at day 4 after the initial blood sample using French guidelines (FG). An AG based on FG was distributed in June 2008 to all Medical Doctors. A second evaluation of AIP was performed from July 2009 to October 2010 after AG distribution. In May 2009, an infectious disease specialist arrived. He re-evaluated at day 4 the initial AIP and modified it if necessary based on the bacteriologic results and the AG. In the second period of the study, we evaluated the cost of the AIP after day 4. RESULTS: Anti-infectious at day 1 was suitable in 37/50 (74%) cases before vs. 148/206 (72%) cases after distribution of the AG (P = 0.76). At day 4, anti-infectious was suitable in 26/50 (52%) before vs. 103/206 (50%) cases after distribution of the AG (P = 0.80). In the second period, the overall cost of AIP was estimated at 44,000 Euros with the infectious disease specialist intervention and at 51,000 Euros without. CONCLUSION: Distribution of AG did not significantly improve AIP in patients with bacteraemia. Re-evaluation by an infectious disease specialist could lead to a better anti-infectious usage and potential reduction in costs.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Guideline Adherence , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Anti-Infective Agents/economics , Drug Prescriptions/economics , France , Humans , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies
3.
Lancet ; 381(9885): 2265-72, 2013 Jun 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23727167

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Human infection with a novel coronavirus named Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) was first identified in Saudi Arabia and the Middle East in September, 2012, with 44 laboratory-confirmed cases as of May 23, 2013. We report detailed clinical and virological data for two related cases of MERS-CoV disease, after nosocomial transmission of the virus from one patient to another in a French hospital. METHODS: Patient 1 visited Dubai in April, 2013; patient 2 lives in France and did not travel abroad. Both patients had underlying immunosuppressive disorders. We tested specimens from the upper (nasopharyngeal swabs) or the lower (bronchoalveolar lavage, sputum) respiratory tract and whole blood, plasma, and serum specimens for MERS-CoV by real-time RT-PCR targeting the upE and Orf1A genes of MERS-CoV. FINDINGS: Initial clinical presentation included fever, chills, and myalgia in both patients, and for patient 1, diarrhoea. Respiratory symptoms rapidly became predominant with acute respiratory failure leading to mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Both patients developed acute renal failure. MERS-CoV was detected in lower respiratory tract specimens with high viral load (eg, cycle threshold [Ct] values of 22·9 for upE and 24 for Orf1a for a bronchoalveolar lavage sample from patient 1; Ct values of 22·5 for upE and 23·9 for Orf1a for an induced sputum sample from patient 2), whereas nasopharyngeal specimens were weakly positive or inconclusive. The two patients shared the same room for 3 days. The incubation period was estimated at 9-12 days for the second case. No secondary transmission was documented in hospital staff despite the absence of specific protective measures before the diagnosis of MERS-CoV was suspected. Patient 1 died on May 28, due to refractory multiple organ failure. INTERPRETATION: Patients with respiratory symptoms returning from the Middle East or exposed to a confirmed case should be isolated and investigated for MERS-CoV with lower respiratory tract sample analysis and an assumed incubation period of 12 days. Immunosuppression should also be taken into account as a risk factor. FUNDING: French Institute for Public Health Surveillance, ANR grant Labex Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases, and the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme projects EMPERIE and PREDEMICS.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Cross Infection/virology , Coronavirus/genetics , Coronavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/diagnostic imaging , Cross Infection/transmission , Fatal Outcome , France/epidemiology , Humans , Infectious Disease Incubation Period , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Travel
4.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 66(2): 169-74, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19793635

ABSTRACT

To assess the incidence of imported malaria in children and to determine the frequency of delayed diagnosis and risk factors for severe malaria, we performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study in the northern region of France and included all children with a positive test for malaria from 2000 to 2006. The incidence of imported malaria in children <18 years, the frequency of a delayed diagnosis, and the risk factors for severe malaria were determined. The study identified 133 children with imported malaria. The mean incidence of this disease was 1.9/100 000 children <18 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-2.2). Detailed data were available for 120 children. Disease was considered severe in 19% of cases. The diagnosis was delayed (> or =1 day after the first medical contact) in 31% of cases, and this delay was the only independent risk factor identified for severe imported malaria in children (adjusted odds ratio, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.2-8.8; P = 0.02).


Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants , Malaria/epidemiology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...