Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Med ; 13(11)2024 May 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38892837

ABSTRACT

Background: Post-radiation fractures are a significant complication of cancer treatment, often being challenging to manage and impacting patients' quality of life. This study systematically reviews the literature on fractures in irradiated bones, focusing on risk factors, treatment modalities, and prevention strategies. Factors increasing fracture risk include exposure to high doses of radiation of at least 50 Gy, female gender, menopausal age, and periosteal stripping. Additionally further risk factors are the size of the original tumor and osteoporosis. Methods: A search of PubMed yielded 541 articles, with 4 were ultimately included in the review. These retrospective studies focused on patients undergoing Combined Limb-Sparing Surgery and Radiation Therapy for soft tissue sarcoma. Results: Results show post-radiation fractures affect approximately 4% of patients, with the femur being the most frequently affected site. Intramedullary nailing emerges as the gold standard treatment, with prosthetic replacement or megaprostheses used in the metaepiphyseal region and as salvage procedures. Non-union and infection remain formidable complications. Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of prophylactic nailing in fracture prevention and the efficacy of free vascularized fibular flaps to achieve bone union during revision surgeries. Limited case availability and patient follow-up hinder comprehensive studies, impacting treatment outcomes.

2.
Acta Biomed ; 94(S2): e2023047, 2023 06 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37366194

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIM In literature, many risk factors have been related to proximal femur fracture, but most of the studies do not explore differences between femoral neck fractures (FNF) and pertrochanteric fractures (PF). The aim of the paper is to review the current literature n order to assess risk factors associated with a specific pattern of proximal femur fracture.   METHODS Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were taken into consideration in the review. Data reported from the included articles were age, gender of the patient, type of femoral fracture, BMI, height, weight, soft tissue composition, BMD, vitamin D levels, PTH levels, hip morphology and hip osteoarthritis.   RESULTS Bone mineral density (BMD) of the intertochanteric region result significant lower in PF, while BMD in femoral neck regione was lower in FNF. Low levels of Vit D with high PTH are observed in TF whereas low levels of vit D and normal PTH in FNF. Hip osteoarthritis (HOA) is significant less present and less severe in FNF, while in PF is usually more frequent or higher grade.   CONCLUSIONS Patients with pertrochanteric fracture are older, with a low cortical thickness in the femoral isthmus, low BMD in the intertrochanteric region, severe HOA, low mean haemoglobin and albumin levels and hypovitaminosis D with a high PTH levels. Patients with FNF are younger, taller, with higher body fat mass, with lower BMD levels in femoral neck region, mild HOA, hypovitaminosis D without PTH response.


Subject(s)
Femoral Fractures , Hip Fractures , Osteoarthritis, Hip , Vitamin D Deficiency , Humans , Hip Fractures/etiology , Femur Neck , Bone Density , Vitamin D , Vitamin D Deficiency/complications
3.
Curr Oncol ; 30(4): 3571-3579, 2023 03 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37185385

ABSTRACT

(1) Background: Some of the goals of orthopedic surgical oncology are saving limbs and function. The humerus is the third most frequent site in primary tumors and one of the most involved sites for metastases. Prosthetic replacement with modular megaprosthesis is one of the treatment choices, but there are several types of complications, such as problems with function and pain. The aim of our study is to assess functional outcomes and shoulder instability in the reconstruction of proximal humerus metastases. (2) Methods: This is a retrospective observational study. Twenty-eight patients, with proximal humerus metastases, admitted to the department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology of our University Hospital between 2014 and 2022 were recruited. Each patient underwent resection and prosthetic replacement surgery with modular megaprosthesis. Clinical evaluation was assessed through MSTS score, WOSI index, and DASH score. (3) Results: Twenty patients were included in the study. Fairly good results, especially regarding pain, function, and emotional acceptance, were obtained in all three tests: DASH, MSTS, and WOSI. Patients who reported shoulder instability actually have worse outcomes than those who report having stable shoulders. In addition, patients with a resection >10 cm have worse outcomes than those who had a resection of 10 cm. No significant differences were found between the deltopectoral approach group and the lateral approach group. (4) Conclusions: Reconstructive surgery with megaprosthesis of the proximal humerus in patients with metastases can be considered a treatment option, especially in patients with pathological fractures or injuries with a high risk of fracture and good life expectancy. This study shows how this type of surgery affects instability, but in terms of functionality, pain, and patient satisfaction, it gives satisfactory results.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms , Joint Instability , Shoulder Joint , Humans , Shoulder/pathology , Shoulder Joint/pathology , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Joint Instability/surgery , Joint Instability/pathology , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Humerus/surgery , Humerus/pathology , Pain
4.
Curr Oncol ; 29(7): 4566-4577, 2022 06 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35877221

ABSTRACT

Bone can be affected by different neoplastic conditions. Limb salvage surgery has become the preferred treatment strategy for most malignant tumors of the extremities. Advanced 3D printing technology has transformed the conventional view of oncological surgery. These types of implants are produced by electron beam melting (EBM) technology by sintering titanium powder in a scaffold shape designed following a project designed from HRCT and MRI. The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcomes and the mid-term follow-up of a population treated with 3D-printed custom-made prosthesis implantation in major oncological bone resection or after failure of primary implants. The primary outcome was the general patient satisfaction one year after surgery. The secondary outcomes were: mortality rate, treatment related complication rate, functional and clinical outcomes (KPS, ADL and IADL). Eight patients were included, five females and two males, with a mean age of 50.3 (±23.72) years at the surgery. The enrolled patients reported a mean satisfaction rate after surgery of 7.38 (±2) where 10 was the maximum value. There were no changes between pre- and postoperative mean KPS (81.43 +/−10.69). Mean preoperative ADL and IADL score was in both cases 4.86 (±1.07), while postoperative was 5 (±0.82), with a delta of 0.13 (p > 0.05). Custom-made prosthesis permits reconstructing bone defects caused by large tumor resection, especially in anatomically complex areas, restoring articular function.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Prosthesis Implantation , Titanium
5.
Andrologia ; 53(11): e14240, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34498769

ABSTRACT

Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) provides excellent outcomes after virgin implants. However, few data on IPP after revision surgery are available. This study aimed at comparing the outcomes of IPP in patients undergoing primary or revision implant surgery. Patients who underwent revision implant surgery (Group 1) between 2013 and 2020 were identified. Overall, 20 patients (Group 1) could be matched with a contemporary matched pair cohort of surgery-naive patients (Group 2) in a 1:1 ratio. Patients in Group 2 had a significantly shorter operative time [median (IQR): 84 (65-97) vs. 65 (51-75) min; p = .01] and lower rate of overall complications (25% vs. 10%; p = .01). Of note, mean (SD) scores for the Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis (QoLSPP) questionnaire demonstrated high satisfaction and IPP efficacy in both Groups 1 and 2: functional domain [3.9 (1.0) vs. 4.0 (1.2); p = .4], personal [3.9 (1.1) vs. 4.0 (1.1); p = .3], relational [3.8 (1.3) vs. 3.9 (1.1); p = .5] and social [3.9 (1.1) vs. 4.0 (1.2); p = .2]. These results suggest that in experienced hands, IPP offers high satisfaction to both patients and partners even in the setting of revision implant. However, it is mandatory to inform those patients about the increased risk of perioperative complications.


Subject(s)
Erectile Dysfunction , Penile Implantation , Penile Prosthesis , Erectile Dysfunction/surgery , Humans , Male , Patient Satisfaction , Propensity Score , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...