Accuracy of contrast swallow study in assessment of caustic esophageal stricture length in children: Agreement study.

BACKGROUND: Caustic esophageal stricture length assessment is essential for planning endoscopic management and predicting its prognosis. We aimed to assess the accuracy of contrast swallow study (CSS) in measuring stricture length in comparison to endoscopy (definitive investigation for actual length measurement). METHOD: Medical records of caustic esophageal strictures between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Reliability study was done to compare between radiological and endoscopic measurement of stricture length. RESULT: 124 CSSs for 91 patients were analyzed. Six studies showed no stricture, single stricture was reported in 101 studies, double strictures were reported in 16 studies, triple strictures were reported in one study (136 radiological stricture). Endoscopy revealed 133 true strictures. Number of the strictures was consistent between CSS and endoscopy in 112 studies (90.3%) and different in 12 studies (9.7%). Eight endoscopies revealed strictures not reported in CSS (5.5% false negative strictures), while 10 CSSs reported 11 strictures that were not detected during the endoscopy (7.6% false positive strictures). Reliability analysis revealed interclass correlation coefficient = 0.6 (95% CI 0.5 to 0.7) indicating moderate reliability. CONCLUSION: CSS is not accurate in assessing caustic esophageal stricture length. Combination of CSS and endoscopic investigation is better for proper evaluation of these patients. Level III of evidence.

Predictors of successful endoscopic management of caustic esophageal strictures in children: When to stop the dilatations?

BACKGROUND: Caustic esophageal strictures are mainly managed by endoscopic dilatations. Cases that do not respond to the dilatations eventually require an esophageal replacement. The aim of our study was to identify factors that could allow us to predict if the dilatations will be successful or not. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the chart of 100 patients with caustic esophageal injuries treated at our center between 2012 and 2019. Collected data included age, gender, type of caustic substance, duration of the dilatations, length and extent of the strictures, number and time interval between dilatations, presence of gastroesophageal reflux, occurrence of esophageal perforation, and outcome of the dilatation program. RESULTS: The patient ages ranged from 1 to 8 years old. The overall success rate was 98.2% for patients with short strictures and 81.8% for patients with long strictures (>3 cm). A long stricture, a pharyngeal extension of the stricture, the occurrence of an esophageal perforation, and the presence of gastroesophageal reflux were strong predictors of the failure of the dilatation program. The median treatment time for the patients to achieve a cure was 5 months in cases of short strictures and 17 months in cases of long strictures. Within the subgroup of patients with long strictures, a dysphagia-free period within the first year of management of 8 weeks was associated with the success of the dilatation program. CONCLUSION: A length of more than 3 cm, pharyngeal involvement, the occurrence of esophageal perforation, and the presence of gastroesophageal reflux are predictors of failure of dilatations for the management of caustic esophageal strictures. A dysphagia-free period of 8 weeks or more within the first year of dilatations is considered a predictor of success of dilatations in patients with long strictures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Iatrogenic esophageal perforation caused by endoscopic dilatation of caustic stricture: Current management and possibility of esophageal salvage.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic esophageal perforation (EP) is an undesirable complication of endoscopic dilatation of caustic esophageal stricture. We reported our current management protocol with possibility of continuing the dilatation program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2009 to January 2020 medical records were reviewed for patients presented with iatrogenic EP. Management according to each case condition was reported. RESULTS: 24 patients were enrolled, aged from 1.5 to 6 years old. Perforation was cervical in one case, abdominal in two cases, and thoracic in 21 cases. Immediate surgical repair was performed in the abdominal cases. Conservative management was chosen in 22 cases; two cases didn't respond and underwent esophageal diversion, and one of them died owing to severe sepsis. Three patients refused another trial of dilatation. Two cases failed to be redilated. 17 patients continued a dilatation program. Time passed between perforation and redilatation ranged from 35 days to 7 months. 15 patients were cured completely from dysphagia, one patient had marked improvement of his dysphagia, and one case with a resistant stricture was referred for esophageal replacement. CONCLUSION: Preserving the native esophagus is possible after iatrogenic EP of caustic esophageal stricture. A conservative approach should be attempted with caution not to endanger patient's life. Level IV of evidence.

Surgical management of corrosive-induced gastric injury in children: 10years' experience.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to report surgical management and outcome of corrosive-induced gastric injuries in children at our institute over the last decade. PATIENTS & METHOD: Medical records of patients admitted for corrosive-induced gastric injury at the Pediatric Surgery Department of Ain Shams University between January 2007 and January 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty six cases (17 boys and 9 girls) were enrolled. Mean age was 3.61±1.29. Ingested agent was acid in all the patients. Main presenting symptom was gastric output obstruction in 22 cases. The interval between corrosive ingestion and presentation ranged from one to 135days (mean=43.9±34). Surgical procedure included total gastrectomy (n=2), partial gastrectomy (n=2), augmentation gastroplasty (n=1), Billroth I (n=2), antrectomy (n=2), antroplasty (n=3), gastrojejunostomy (n=2), Heineke-Mikulicz pyloroplasty (n=9), Finney pyloroplasty (n=5), and feeding jejunostomy (n=4). Anastomotic stricture requiring a second operation developed in one patient. There were three mortalities related to the associated esophageal strictures. The mean follow-up period is 3.5years. All patients are free of symptoms and gained adequate weight. CONCLUSION: Surgery is the mainstay of management for corrosive-induced gastric injuries with good long-term results. Surgical procedure should be tailored according to the patient's general condition and extent of gastric injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: This is a case series with no comparison group (level IV).

Closed Gastroschisis.

Closed gastroschisis is a rare entity usually associated with intestinal atresia and short bowel syndrome. We report two cases of closed gastroschisis presenting with neonatal intestinal obstruction and para-umbilical evisceration without an abdominal defect.

Colonic Atresia: Association with Other Anomalies.

BACKGROUND: Colonic atresia (CA) is a rare form of congenital intestinal atresia. Although CA may be isolated, it is more commonly reported in literature in association with other congenital anomalies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a review of prospectively collected data of all the patients with colonic atresia presented to our center (Ain Shams University) during 2008 to 2016. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled in this study. The atresia was of type I in one case, type II in four cases, type IIIa in six cases, type IV in one case. These cases accounted for 4.9 % of intestinal atresias managed in our center during the same period. Five cases were isolated CA, while the other seven cases had associated abdominal congenital anomalies (exomphalos, Hirschsprung's disease, imperforate anus, closing gastroschisis, colonic duplication, and multiple small bowel atresia in two cases). The management in ten cases was by staged procedure with creation of a temporary stoma initially, while primary anastomosis was established in two cases. We had two cases with delayed presentations, one missed diagnosis, and three mortalities in this series. CONCLUSIONS: The low incidence of CA may result in delay in the diagnosis and management. Hirschsprung's disease should be excluded in every case of colonic atresia. Early diagnosis and proper surgical management is essential for good prognosis.

The radiological assessment of colonic replacement of the esophagus in children: A review of 43 cases.

PURPOSE: To define the characteristic radiological features following colonic replacement of the esophagus in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The upper gastro-intestinal contrast studies of 43 patients who underwent colonic replacement of the esophagus at our pediatric surgery unit were available for analysis. UGI contrast studies were performed routinely in the post-surgical period in 17 cases (first asymptomatic group), while the rest of contrast studies (26) belonged to a second group of out-patients complaining of dysphagia (18) or dyspepsia (8) following colonic replacement of the esophagus. Based on our observations, we proposed a grading system to describe the degree of colonic redundancy in the thorax. RESULTS: Redundancy of the colonic conduit in the thoracic cavity was a common radiological finding (62.8%). The redundancy was mild (grade 1) in 18 patients, moderate (grade 2) in eight, and severe (grade 3) in only one patient. In 88.9%, the redundancy was in the right hemi-thorax. Patients presenting with postoperative dysphagia had a stricture at the site of the esophago-colic anastomosis in the neck, which should be differentiated from other sites of anatomical narrowing at the inlet and outlet of the thoracic cavity. Gastro-colic reflux was common among patients who underwent colonic replacement of the esophagus without an anti-reflux procedure. CONCLUSION: Colonic replacement of the esophagus in children results in considerable anatomical alterations. Knowledge about the normal post-surgical changes and imaging features of the commonly encountered complications can increase the diagnostic confidence among radiologists and clinicians when dealing with these cases.

Topical mitomycin C application is effective in management of localized caustic esophageal stricture: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Frequent sessions of endoscopic dilatation are usually required in the management of benign esophageal strictures, especially caustic induced ones. Topical mitomycin C (MMC) has been recently used in the management of resistant strictures. This study evaluated the efficacy of MMC application in prevention of stricture recurrence after endoscopic dilatation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial included forty patients with caustic esophageal strictures dating from January 2008 to October 2010. Patients were randomized into 2 groups to undergo endoscopic dilatation with application of either MMC versus placebo on stricture site. Regular follow up and re-evaluation were done after 6 months of management. The number of dilatation sessions needed for resolution of dysphagia in each group was our primary outcome. RESULTS: During the specified follow up period, 80 % of strictures in the MMC group got completely resolved compared to only 35% in the placebo group. The mean number of dilatation sessions needed in the MMC group was n = 3.85 ± 2.08 compared to n = 6.9 ± 2.12 in the placebo group which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Mitomycin C application significantly reduced the number of dilatation sessions needed to alleviate dysphagia in patients with caustic esophageal strictures.