Prolonged fear responses in mice lacking dopamine D1 receptor.

Dopamine is an important neurotransmitter involved in learning and memory including emotional memory. The involvement of dopamine in conditioned fear has been widely documented. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms that underlie contextual fear conditioning and memory consolidation. To address this issue, we used dopamine D1-deficient mice (D1-/-) and their wild-type (D1+/+) and heterozygote (D1+/-) siblings to assess aversive learning and memory. We quantified two different aspects of fear responses to an environment where the mice have previously received unsignaled footshocks. Using one-trial step-through passive avoidance and conditioned freezing paradigms, mice were conditioned to receive mild inescapable footshocks then tested for acquisition, retention and extinction of conditioned fear responses 5 min after and up to 45-90 days post-training. No differences were observed among any of the genotypes in the acquisition of passive avoidance response or fear-induced freezing behavior. However, with extended testing, D1-/- mice exhibited prolonged retention and delayed extinction of conditioned fear responses in both tasks, suggesting that D1-/- mice are capable of acquiring aversive learning normally. These findings demonstrate that the dopamine D1 receptor is not important for acquisition or consolidation of aversive learning and memory but has an important role in modulating the extinction of fear memory.

Modification of dopamine D(1) receptor knockout phenotype in mice lacking both dopamine D(1) and D(3) receptors.

Experimental evidence suggests that dopamine D(1) and D(3) receptors may interact in an opposing or synergistic fashion. To investigate interactions between both receptors in behaviour, we have used dopamine D(1) and D(3) receptor knockout mice to generate mice lacking both receptors. D(1)(-/-)D(3)(-/-) mice were viable, fertile and showed no gross morphological abnormalities. In an open field, they exhibited lower activity than wild-type, D(1)(-/-) and D(3)(-/-) mice. D(1)(-/-)D(3)(-/-) mice performed equally poorly in the rotarod and Morris water maze tasks as their D(1)(-/-) littermates. Basal locomotor activity and anxiety-like behaviour were normal in D(1)(-/-)D(3)(-/-) mice. Combined deletion of both receptors abolished the exploratory hyperactivity and anxiolytic-like behaviour of dopamine D(3) receptor mutant phenotype and further attenuated the low exploratory phenotype of D(1)(-/-) mice. These results imply an interaction of both receptors in the expression of exploratory behaviour in a novel environment, and the need for the presence of intact dopamine D(1) receptor for the expression of certain behaviours manifested in dopamine D(3) receptor mutant phenotype. In addition, dopamine D(1) receptor, but not dopamine D(3) receptor, is involved in the ability to perform on the rotarod and spatial learning.

Spatial learning deficit in dopamine D(1) receptor knockout mice.

Dopamine D(1) receptors are expressed in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, suggesting a role in cognition. Dopamine D(1) receptor-deficient mice (D(1)-/-) were used to investigate the role of this receptor in spatial learning and memory. Using the Morris water maze, mice were trained to locate a hidden platform. Subsequently, the platform was removed from the maze and mice were scored for the percentage of time spent in the target quadrant and the number of crossings through the target position. D(1)-/- mice had significantly longer escape latencies compared to wild-type (D(1)+/+) and heterozygous (D(1)+/-) littermates and showed absence of spatial bias during the probe trials. In a visually cued task, D(1)-/- mice performed better than on the hidden platform trials, but maintained slightly higher escape latencies than D(1)+/+ and D(1)+/- mice. Naive D(1)-/- mice exposed only to the cued task eventually acquired identical escape latencies as the D(1)+/+ and D(1)+/- mice. Sensorimotor reflexes, locomotor activity, spontaneous alternation and contextual learning were not different among the groups. These results indicate that D(1)-/- mice have a deficit in spatial learning without visual or motor impairment, suggesting that dopamine D(1) receptors are involved in at least one form of the cognitive processes.

Disruption of dopamine D1 receptor gene expression attenuates alcohol-seeking behavior.

The role of the dopamine D1 receptor subtype in alcohol-seeking behaviors was studied in mice genetically deficient in dopamine D1 receptors (D1 -/-). In two-tube free choice limited (1-5 h) and continuous (24 h) access paradigms, mice were exposed to water and increasing concentrations of ethanol (3%, 6% and 12% w/v). Voluntary ethanol consumption and preference over water were markedly reduced in D1 -/- mice as compared to heterozygous (D1 +/-) and wild-type (D1 +/+) controls, whereas overall fluid consumption was comparable. When offered a single drinking tube containing alcohol as their only source of fluid for 24 h, D1 -/- mice continued to drink significantly less alcohol than D1 +/+ and D1 +/- mice. Dopamine D2 receptor blockade with sulpiride caused a small but significant reduction in alcohol intake and preference in D1 +/+ mice and attenuated residual alcohol drinking in D1 -/- mice. Dopamine D1 receptor blockade with SCH-23390 very effectively reduced alcohol intake in D1 +/+ and D1 +/- mice to the level seen in untreated D1 -/- mice. These findings suggest involvement of both dopamine D1 and D2 receptor mechanisms in alcohol-seeking behavior in mice; however, these implicate D1 receptors as having a more important role in the motivation for alcohol consumption.

The contribution of environmental cues to cross-tolerance between ethanol and pentobarbital.

The contribution of Pavlovian conditioning of environmental cues has been studied in relation to tolerance to ethanol-induced hypothermia and cross-tolerance to pentobarbital. Two groups of 12 male Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed every other day to a distinctive set of environmental cues paired with an IP injection of either ethanol 2.5 g/kg or an equivalent volume of isotonic saline. On alternating non-drug days, both groups received saline in the animal room. When they were tested for tolerance to the hypothermic effect of ethanol 2.5 g/kg and cross-tolerance to pentobarbital 25 mg/kg in each environment, tolerance and cross-tolerance in the ethanol-treated group were significantly more pronounced in the ethanol-paired environment than in the saline-paired environment. This indicates the importance of a conditional factor in tolerance and cross-tolerance in this paradigm. Determination of blood levels of ethanol and pentobarbital at various times after injection indicated that conditioned tolerance and cross-tolerance can be explained in part by dispositional factors.