The Clinical Significance of Incidental GIT Uptake on PET/CT: Radiologic, Endoscopic, and Pathologic Correlation.

Incidental gastrointestinal tract (GIT) [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in positron emission technology/computed tomography (PET/CT) is an unexpected and often complicated finding for clinicians. This retrospective study reviewed 8991 charts of patients who underwent PET/CT: 440 patients had incidental GIT uptake, of which 80 underwent endoscopy. Patient characteristics, imaging parameters, and endoscopic findings were studied. Of the 80 patients, 31 had cancer/pre-cancer lesions (16 carcinomas; 15 pre-malignant polyps). Compared to patients with benign/absent lesions, patients with cancer/pre-cancer lesions were significantly older (p = 0.01), underwent PET/CT for primary evaluation/staging of cancer (p = 0.03), had focal GIT uptake (p = 0.04), and had lower GIT uptake (p = 0.004). Among patients with focal uptake, an SUVmax of 9.2 had the highest sensitivity (0.76) and specificity (0.885) in detecting cancer/pre-cancerous lesions. Lower GIT uptake was most common in the sigmoid colon, and upper GIT uptake was most frequent in the stomach. In a bivariate analysis, predictors of cancer/pre-cancer were older age, PET/CT indicated for primary evaluation, focal uptake, uptake in the lower GIT, and higher SUVmax. Further endoscopic investigation is warranted for patients with incidental GIT uptake, especially in the elderly or those presenting for primary evaluation with PET/CT, with the following findings on imaging: lower GIT uptake, focal uptake, or high SUVmax.

Well-differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with positive FDG-PET/CT: a retrospective chart review.

PURPOSE: Rarely, well-differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NETs) can have positive uptake on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/computerized tomography ( 18 F-FDG-PET/CT), with or without a positive 68 Ga-PET/CT. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic role of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with well-differentiated GEP NETs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a chart of patients diagnosed with GEP NETs between 2014 and 2021, at the American University of Beirut Medical Center, who have low (G1; Ki-67 ≤2) or intermediate (G2; and Ki-67 >2-≤20) well-differentiated tumors with positive findings on FDG-PET/CT. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) compared to historical control, and the secondary outcome is to describe their clinical outcome. RESULTS: In total 8 out of 36 patients with G1 or G2 GEP NET met the inclusion criteria for this study. The median age was 60 years (range 51-75 years) and 75% were male. One patient (12.5%) had a G1 tumor whereas 7 (87.5%) had G2, and seven patients were stage IV. The primary tumor was intestinal in 62.5% of the patients and pancreatic in 37.5%. Seven patients had both 18 F-FDG-PET/CT and 68 Ga-PET/CT positive and one patient had a positive 18 F-FDG-PET/CT and negative 68 Ga-PET/CT. Median and mean PFS in patients positive for both 68 Ga-PET/CT and 18 F-FDG-PET/CT were 49.71 months and 37.5 months (95% CI, 20.7-54.3), respectively. PFS in these patients is lower than that reported in the literature for G1/G2 NETs with positive 68 Ga-PET/CT and negative FDG-PET/CT (37.5 vs. 71 months; P = 0.0217). CONCLUSION: A new prognostic score that includes 18 F-FDG-PET/CT in G1/G2 GEP NETs could identify more aggressive tumors.

Prone versus Supine FDG PET/CT in the Staging of Breast Cancer.

Supine [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission technology/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a commonly used modality for the initial staging of breast cancer, and several previous studies have shown superior sensitivity and specificity of prone FDG PET/CT in comparison to its supine counterpart. This retrospective study included 25 females with breast cancer referred for staging. They underwent supine FDG PET/CT followed by prone FDG PET/CT. The outcomes were: number of primary breast lesions, anatomical site of FDG-avid lymph nodes (LNs), and number and type of bone lesions, with SUVmax of all corresponding parameters. Performance was superior in prone acquisition compared to supine acquisition, with the respective results: 29 vs. 22 breast tumor lesions detected, 62 vs. 27 FDG-avid axillary LNs detected, sensitivity of 68% vs. 57%, specificity of 64% vs. 53%. The detection rate of axillary LNs in the prone position was significantly higher (p = 0.001). SUVmax for breast tumor lesions (p = 0.000) and number of detected axillary LNs (p = 0.002) were significantly higher in prone acquisition. Five patients were upstaged after experts read the prone acquisition. Prone FDG PET/CT acquisition is a promising technique in detecting primary breast lesions and metastatic LNs possibly missed in supine acquisition, which may lead to change in patient staging and management.