[Further experiences with transplantation of the head of the fibula]. / Weitere Erfahrungen mit der Transplantation des Fibulakopfes.

We are presenting our experience with vascularized epiphyseal transplantation of the upper end of the fibula, based distally on the anterior tibial artery in two patients, one suffering from septic epiphysitis of the hip with complete loss of the head and neck of the femur, the other suffering from radial club hand following septic loss of the radius, excluding its proximal and distal articular segments. In the first patient, the fibular epiphysis bridged the bone defect and provided growth at the neck of the femur. This restored hip stability, reduced limb-length discrepancy, initiated some degree of acetabular development, and maintained a functional range of hip motion. In the second patient, transplantation of the upper end of the fibula was used to bridge a gap resulting from complete resorption of the right radius and provide for growth of the radius. At follow-up, complete union of the graft was noted. The club-hand appearance improved markedly. Pronation and supination were regained. However, donor-site morbidity was a problem. It included sloughing of part of the peroneal muscles and the skin edge of the incision. This was due to loss of the anterior tibial artery as well as injury to the peroneal vessel collaterals supplying the skin and peroneal muscles. The latter occurred due to opening of the posterior compartment of the leg in an attempt to locate the anterior tibial artery at its origin from the popliteal artery. It is therefore concluded, that transplantation of the upper end of the fibula is a valuable reconstructive alternative for septic epiphysitis with complete loss of the head and neck of the femur as well as for septic loss of the radius. However, whenever an extended part of the upper end of the fibula needs being harvested, this should be performed through an anterior approach, in order to avoid sloughing of the skin and muscles of the anterior and lateral compartments of the leg.

Reconstruction after resection of tumors around the knee: role of the free vascularized fibular graft.

We present our experience with reconstruction after resection of tumors around the knee, using free vascularized fibular grafting. The study included 23 patients. The lower femur was involved in 17 cases, the upper tibia in 6. The cases included giant cell tumor of the lower femur (2 patients), giant cell tumor of the upper tibia (1 patient), malignant fibrous histiocytoma of the lower femur (1 patient), parosteal osteosarcoma (1 patient), and periosteal osteosarcoma (1 patient). The remaining patients suffered from conventional osteogenic sarcomas. The size of the defect ranged from 12 to 16 cm in length. Skin flap necrosis after tumor resection was the most common complication encountered. Other complications included peroneal nerve involvement in one case and rupture of the arterial anastomosis in another. All transferred fibulas progressed to union within 7-9 months. Union time of both upper and lower ends of the fibula and time of appearance of periosteal reaction were identical. In evaluating periosteal hypertrophy of the fibula, the hypertrophy (de Boer) index (de Boer HD, Wood MB, J Bone Joint Surg 1989;71B:374-378) proved unreliable. False positive results are obtained, when callus formation around the lower end of the femur is far more abundant than at the upper end of the fibula. For this reason, we introduced the graft index. The latter is the ratio between the diameter of the graft at its thinnest portion at latest follow-up to its diameter on the day of operation, as calculated on plain radiographs. Two of the viable fibulas developed stress fractures after plate removal. Functional and quality-of -life results were satisfactory. It is concluded that the free vascularized fibular graft remains a valuable reconstruction option after the resection of tumors around the knee, provided certain precautions are followed. First, before closure of the wound, the skin flaps should be assessed for their viability. Necrotic parts should be excised. Stable fixation is a necessary prerequisite at the time of operation. Removal of the fixation device should not be guided by union or periosteal hypertrophy, but by true widening of the medullary canal.