Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Hum Exp Toxicol ; 42: 9603271231222253, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38105648

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of disturbed consciousness level (DCL) is crucial for predicting acutely poisoned patients' outcomes. AIM: Development of a novel Poisoning Agitation-Sedation Score (PASS) to predict the need for endotracheal intubation (ETI) and mechanical ventilation (MV) in acutely poisoned patients with DCL. Validation of the proposed score on a new set of acutely poisoned patients with DCL. METHODS: This study was conducted on 187 acutely poisoned patients with DCL admitted to hospital from June 2020 to November 2021 (Derivation cohort). Patients' demographics, toxicological data, neurological examination, calculation of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), and outcomes were gathered for developing a new score. The proposed score was externally validated on 100 acutely poisoned patients with DCL (Validation cohort). RESULTS: The PASS assessing sedation consists of FOUR (reflexes and respiration) and GCS (motor) and provides a significantly excellent predictive power (AUC = 0.975) at a cutoff ≤9 with 100% sensitivity and 92.11% specificity for predicting the need for ETI and MV in sedated patients. Additionally, adding RASS (agitation) to the previous model exhibits significantly good predictive power (AUC = 0.893), 90.32% sensitivity, and 73.68% specificity at a cutoff ≤14 for predicting the need for ETI and MV in disturbed consciousness patients with agitation. CONCLUSION: The proposed PASS could be an excellent, valid and feasible tool to predict the need for ETI and MV in acutely poisoned disturbed consciousness patients with or without agitation.


Subject(s)
Poisons , Humans , Respiration, Artificial , Consciousness , Hospitalization , Intubation, Intratracheal
3.
Toxicol Res (Camb) ; 12(3): 507-519, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37397927

ABSTRACT

Aluminum phosphide (ALP)-induced cardiotoxicity is a major cause of high mortality rates. As there is no specific antidote, restoring cardiac hemodynamics is the cornerstone for saving patients. Based on oxidative stress theory in acute ALP poisoning, we examined the cardioprotective role of coconut oil and Coenzyme Q10 (COQ10) in ALP poisoning, focusing on their antioxidant capacity. This study was a randomized, controlled, single-blind, phase II clinical trial conducted at Tanta Poison Control Center over 1 year. Eighty-four ALP poisoned patients received supportive treatment and were randomly allocated to three equal groups. Gastric lavage was performed using sodium bicarbonate 8.4% with saline in group I. Alternatively, group II received 50 ml coconut oil, and group III initially received 600 mg CoQ10 dissolved in 50 ml coconut oil; and repeated 12 hours later. In addition to patient characteristics, clinical, laboratory, electrocardiography (ECG), and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) data were recorded and repeated 12 hours later. Patient outcomes were evaluated. There was no significant difference among groups considering patient characteristics, initial cardiotoxicity severity, vital, laboratory data, ECG changes, and TAC. However, 12 hours post-admissions, group III was significantly improved in all clinical, laboratory, and ECG parameters than comparable groups. Significant correlations were observed between elevated TAC in groups II and III with hemodynamic, serum troponin, and ECG variables. Accordingly, the need for intubation, mechanical ventilation, and the total vasopressor dose was significantly decreased in group III compared with other groups. Therefore, coconut oil and COQ10 are promising cardioprotective adjuvant therapy ameliorating the ALP-induced cardiotoxicity.

4.
Toxicol Res (Camb) ; 12(1): 95-106, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36866221

ABSTRACT

Identifying high-risk pediatric patients with non-pharmaceutical poisoning is crucial to avoid prospective complications and decrease the evident hospital economic burden. Although the preventive strategies have been well studied, determining the early predictors for poor outcomes remains limited. Therefore, this study focused on the initial clinical and laboratory parameters as a triage of non-pharmaceutical poisoned children for potential adverse outcomes taking the causative substance effects into account. This retrospective cohort study included pediatric patients admitted to Tanta University Poison Control Center from January 2018 to December 2020. Sociodemographic, toxicological, clinical, and laboratory data were retrieved from the patient's files. Adverse outcomes were categorized into mortality, complications, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Out of enrolled 1,234 pediatric patients, preschool children constituted the highest percentage of the patients investigated (45.06%), with a female predominance (53.2%). The main non-pharmaceutical agents included pesticides (62.6%), corrosives (19%), and hydrocarbons (8.8%), mainly associated with adverse consequences. The significant determinants for adverse outcomes were pulse, respiratory rate, serum bicarbonate (HCO3), Glasgow Coma Scale, O2 saturation, Poisoning Severity Score (PSS), white blood cells (WBCs), and random blood sugar. The cutoffs of serum HCO3 < 17.55 mmol/l, WBCs >8,650 cells/microliter, and PSS > 2 points were the best discriminators for mortality, complications, and ICU admission, respectively. Thus, monitoring these predictors is essential to prioritize and triage pediatric patients who require high-quality care and follow-up, particularly in aluminum phosphide, sulfuric acid, and benzene intoxications.

5.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 30(12): 32489-32506, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36462082

ABSTRACT

Paraphenylenediamine (PPD) is a commonly used xenobiotic in hair dying, causing deleterious outcomes in acute poisoning. Although many epidemiological studies and case reports explained their clinical presentations and fatal consequences, no studies have evaluated the early determinants of adverse outcomes. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the initial predictors of acute PPD poisoning adverse outcomes, focusing on the discriminatory accuracy of the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. A retrospective cohort study included all acute PPD-poisoned patients admitted to three Egyptian emergency hospitals from January 2020 to January 2022. Data was gathered on admission, including demographics, toxicological, clinical, scoring systems, and laboratory investigations. Patients were categorized according to their outcomes (mortality and complications). Ninety-seven patients with acute PPD poisoning were included, with a median age of 23 years, female predominance (60.8%), and suicidal intention (95.9%). Out of all patients, 25.77% died, and 43.29% had complicated outcomes. Respiratory failure was the primary cause of fatalities (10.30%), while acute renal failure (38.14%) was a chief cause of complications. The delay time till hospitalization, abnormal electrocardiogram, initial creatine phosphokinase, bicarbonate level, REMS, and SOFA scores were the significant determinants for adverse outcomes. The REMS exhibited the highest odds ratio (OR = 1.91 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.41-2.60], p < 0.001) and had the best discriminatory power with the area under the curve (AUC) = 0.918 and overall accuracy of 91.8% in predicting mortality. However, the SOFA score had the highest odds ratio (OR = 4.97 [95% CI: 1.16-21.21], p = 0.001) and only yielded a significant prediction for complicated sequels with AUC = 0.913 and overall accuracy of 84.7%. The REMS is a simple clinical score that accurately predicts mortality, whereas the SOFA score is more practicable for anticipating complications in acute PPD-poisoned patients.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine , Organ Dysfunction Scores , Humans , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Male , Retrospective Studies , ROC Curve
6.
Leg Med (Tokyo) ; 58: 102075, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35504141

ABSTRACT

Differentiation between the various manner of stab cases is challenging in forensic medicine. Although the distinction between homicidal and suicidal stabbing is well defined, there is a lack of discrimination between accidental and homicidal cases. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the characteristics of and outcomes for stab patients admitted to multiple emergency hospitals to highlight the distinction between accidental and homicidal stab wounds. This prospective cohort study assessed all patients with stab wounds admitted to multiple emergency hospitals from February 2021 to October 2021. Data collected on admission were demographics, trauma circumstances, internal organ damage, and patients' outcomes. Afterward, patients were categorized into homicidal or accidental stabs. Most of the included 51 stab cases were homicidal (78.4%). Most homicidal stabs were in middle-aged male drivers; were caused by sharp weapons, such as a penknife; and occurred in fights outdoors during the summer daytime. In contrast, most accidental stabs were occupational among building carpenters. Although homicidal stab wounds were significantly associated with a regular elliptical shape, oblique orientation, and defense wounds, the existence of a regular elliptical wound shape increased the likelihood of a homicidal stab. Additionally, penetrating stab type and a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) were the dominant predictors of complications and mortality in stab patients, respectively. For fatal vague stab cases scenarios, the presence of an elliptical wound suggests the probability of homicidal injury than accidental. The initial ISS and stab wound type should be assessed to stratify stab patients who need intensive management in emergency hospitals.


Subject(s)
Homicide , Wounds, Stab , Accidents , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
7.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 29(23): 33999-34009, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35031983

ABSTRACT

The decision of intensive care unit (ICU) admission in acute pesticide poisoning is often challenging, especially in developing countries with limited resources. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), and Poisoning Severity Score (PSS) in predicting ICU admission and mortality of acute pesticide-poisoned patients. This prospective cohort study included all patients admitted to Tanta University Poison Control Center with acute pesticide poisoning from the start of March 2018 to the end of March 2019. Patient data, including demographic and toxicological data, clinical examination, laboratory investigation, and score values, were collected on admission. Out of 337 acute pesticide-poisoned patients, 30.5% were admitted to the ICU, including those poisoned with aluminum phosphide (ALP) (81.5%) and organophosphates (OP) (18.5%). Most non-survivors (86.6%) were ALP poisoning. The PSS had the best discriminatory power in predicting ICU admission and mortality, followed by APACHE II and MEWS. However, no significant difference in predicting ICU admission of OP-poisoned patients was detected between the scores. Additionally, no significant difference in mortality prediction of ALP-poisoned patients was found between the PSS and APACHE II. The PSS, APACHE II, and MEWS are good discriminators for outcome prediction of acute pesticide poisoning on admission. Although the PSS showed the best performance, MEWS was simpler, more feasible, and practicable in predicting ICU admission of OP-poisoned patients. Moreover, the APACHE II has better sensitivity for mortality prediction of ALP-poisoned patients.


Subject(s)
Organophosphate Poisoning , Pesticides , Poisons , APACHE , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
8.
Cardiovasc Toxicol ; 22(1): 1-13, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33400130

ABSTRACT

Acute cardiovascular poisoning is a major cause of adverse outcomes in poisoning emergencies. The prognostic validity of corrected QT (QTc) and dispersed QT (QTd) in these outcomes is still limited. The present study aimed to determine the risk factors of mortality, adverse cardiovascular events (ACVE), and intensive care unit (ICU) admission in patients with acute cardiovascular toxicities and assess the validity of QTc and QTd intervals in predicting these outcomes. This study was conducted on adult patients admitted to Tanta University Poison Control Center with a history of acute cardiotoxic drugs or toxins exposure. The demographic and toxicological data of patients were recorded. Clinical examination, routine laboratory investigations, ECG grading, and measurement of QTc and QTd were performed. The patients were grouped according to their adverse outcomes. Among the included patients, 51 (31.48%) patients died, 61 (37.65%) patients had ACVE, and 68 (41.98%) patients required ICU admission. The most common cause of poisoning is aluminum phosphide, followed by cholinesterase inhibitors. QTd and QTdc showed no significant difference among outcome groups. The best cut-off values of QTc to predict mortality, ACVE, and ICU admission were > 491.1 ms, > 497.9 ms, and ≥ 491.9 ms, respectively. The derived cut-off QTc values were independent predictors for all adverse outcomes after adjusting for poison type, serum HCO3, and pulse. The highest odds ratios for all adverse outcomes were observed in aluminum phosphide poisoning and low HCO3 < 18 mmol/L. Thus, serum HCO3 and QTc interval should be monitored for acute cardiotoxicities, especially in aluminum phosphide and cholinesterase inhibitors poisoning.


Subject(s)
Aluminum Compounds/poisoning , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Cholinesterase Inhibitors/poisoning , Decision Support Techniques , Electrocardiography , Heart Conduction System/drug effects , Heart Rate/drug effects , Pesticides/toxicity , Phosphines/poisoning , Action Potentials , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/chemically induced , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/mortality , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Cardiotoxicity , Egypt , Female , Heart Conduction System/physiopathology , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Young Adult
9.
Cardiovasc Toxicol ; 21(10): 835-847, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34259994

ABSTRACT

Although digoxin poisoning has declined in the past decades, it still has deleterious outcomes. The hallmark of serious life-threatening arrhythmias remains challenging due to its non-specific initial presentation. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the initial predictive factors for recurrent serious arrhythmias and the need for temporary pacing in acute digoxin-poisoned patients. This retrospective cohort study included all patients with acute digoxin poisoning admitted to Tanta University Poison Control Center from 2017 to 2020. Demographic and toxicological data, poisoning severity score (PSS), laboratory investigations, and serial ECG monitoring data were documented. Patients were divided according to their age into a childhood group and adolescence & adulthood group. Each age group was divided into two subgroups according to the presence of recurrent serious arrhythmias. Patient outcomes, including intensive care unit admission, temporary pacing, and in-hospital mortality were recorded. A percentage of 37.34% (n = 31) of the included patients had recurrent serious arrhythmias in both groups. Recurrent serious arrhythmias groups had significantly low heart rate, prolonged PR interval, high PSS, Mobitz II dysrhythmias, elevated serum digoxin, serum potassium and serum creatinine, and increased adverse outcomes compared to other groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that only serum digoxin and potassium levels were significant independent predictors of recurrent serious arrhythmias and temporary pacing. Serum digoxin level had an excellent discriminatory power with the best sensitivity and specificity, followed by serum potassium level in both groups. Thus, monitoring serum digoxin and potassium levels is essential in all patients with acute digoxin poisoning, especially with limited Fab availability.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/chemically induced , Digoxin/poisoning , Heart Rate/drug effects , Adolescent , Adult , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Biomarkers/blood , Child, Preschool , Digoxin/blood , Egypt , Electrocardiography , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Poison Control Centers , Potassium/blood , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Young Adult
10.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol ; 129(3): 256-267, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34117718

ABSTRACT

Early risk stratification of acutely poisoned patients is essential to identify patients at high risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We aimed to develop a prognostic model and risk-stratification nomogram based on the readily accessible clinical and laboratory predictors on admission for the probability of ICU admission in acutely poisoned patients. This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with acute toxic exposure to a drug or a chemical substance. Patients' demographic, toxicologic, clinical and laboratory data were collected. Among the 1260 eligible patients, 180 (14.3%) were admitted to the ICU. We developed a generalized prognostic model for predicting ICU admission in patients with acute poisoning. The predictors included the Glasgow coma scale, oxygen saturation, diastolic blood pressure, respiratory rate and blood bicarbonate concentration. The model displayed excellent discrimination and calibration (optimistic-adjusted area under the curve = 0.924 and optimistic-adjusted Hosmer and Lemeshow test = 0.922, respectively) when internally validated. Additionally, we developed prognostic models that determine ICU admission in patients with specific poisonings. Furthermore, we constructed risk-stratification nomograms that rank the probability of ICU admission in these patients. The developed risk-stratification nomograms help decision-making regarding ICU admission in acute poisonings. Future external validation in independent cohorts is necessary before clinical application.


Subject(s)
Chemically-Induced Disorders/diagnosis , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Nomograms , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33208083

ABSTRACT

In late 2019, SARS-COV-2 disease was firstly discovered in Wuhan, China and then it infected millions of people worldwide. Later, the World Health Organization (WHO) described COVID-19 as the first pandemic invading the world in the 21st century. The WHO has declared that the emerging infection will last long enough to force adjustments not only in people's lifestyles but also in the health care system. This amendment is expected to spread through many medical practices and specialties. A lot of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities have been proposed for COVID-19 management. The best strategy for the management of patients requires a multi-disciplinary team approach with correct decisions regarding the right timing of each modality of treatment. The participating multidisciplinary team for COVID-19 management includes six infectious diseases experts in Tanta University; one critical care management expert, an emergency medicine expert and two pharmacists in Tanta University. In this review, we reported our multi-disciplinary team experience with up to date literature guidance to propose a valid protocol for the management of COVID-19 patients in a limited resources setting.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/methods , COVID-19/prevention & control , Developing Countries , Disease Management , Health Resources , Patient Care Team , Academic Medical Centers/economics , COVID-19/economics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Developing Countries/economics , Egypt/epidemiology , Health Resources/economics , Humans , Patient Care Team/economics
12.
Hum Exp Toxicol ; 39(5): 614-623, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31885284

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Delayed neurological sequels (DNS) have been described after carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning. There is a need to find a new prognostic marker to guide the use of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy. AIM: To evaluate serum S-100ß level in patients presenting with acute CO poisoning as an indicator of poisoning severity and predictor of DNS occurrence and HBO need in those patients. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included patients with acute CO poisoning. On admission, carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) and S-100ß levels were measured. Patients were followed up for 6 months for signs of DNS. RESULTS: Out of 50 patients, 6 only developed DNS. The mean of S-100ß levels was significantly higher in patients with severe poisoning and those with DNS. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that S-100ß had an area under the curve 0. 871; at a cutoff value ≥ 0.67 µg/L, its sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 77.3%, respectively. The sensitivity of S-100ß was significantly higher than that of COHb, while its specificity and overall accuracy were significantly higher than those of HBO criteria. CONCLUSION: Serum S-100ß level on admission could be a marker of poisoning severity and a predictor of CO-induced DNS development that guides the use of HBO therapy.


Subject(s)
Carbon Monoxide Poisoning/blood , Carbon Monoxide Poisoning/therapy , Hyperbaric Oxygenation , Neurotoxicity Syndromes/blood , S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit/blood , Adolescent , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Carboxyhemoglobin/analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult
13.
Hum Exp Toxicol ; 36(6): 539-546, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27337981

ABSTRACT

The decision of intubation and mechanical ventilation in poisoned patients with impaired consciousness can be a difficult task. The present study aimed to evaluate the power of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II), rapid acute physiology score (RAPS) and rapid emergency medicine score (REMS) at admission in predicting the need of intubation and mechanical ventilation in drug overdose patients with disturbed consciousness level (DCL). This prospective observational study was conducted on 104 poisoned patients who were admitted to Tanta Toxicological Unit with a DCL. Four scoring systems (GCS, APACHE II, RAPS and REMS) were recorded for all patients on admission. Discrimination was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics curve and calculating the area under the curve (AUC). Twenty-four cases required mechanical ventilation. The mechanically ventilated patients had significantly lower value of GCS and higher values of APACHE II, REMS and RAPS than other group ( p < 0.001). Although the APACHE II score has the best AUC value (0.796) in predicting mechanical ventilation, there was no statistically significant difference between the four scores. GCS > 8 had 100% negative predictive value, while REMS > 8 had 100% positive predictive value.


Subject(s)
Drug Overdose/diagnosis , Drug Overdose/therapy , Glasgow Coma Scale , Respiration, Artificial , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Area Under Curve , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Admission , ROC Curve , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...