Does detrusor underactivity affect the results of transurethral resection of prostate?

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and diagnosed to have weak detrusor contractility by urodynamic study. METHODS: A prospective study of 32 male patients had BPH candidate for TURP diagnosed to have impaired detrusor contractility by preoperative urodynamic study. We studied the postoperative outcome after TURP regarding international prostate symptoms score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax), post-voiding residual urine (PVR), the patients need for catheter, and urodynamic pressure flow study (PFS) parameters (maximum detrusor contractility, bladder contractility index (BCI), maximum bladder capacity and compliance) after 6 month follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-one cases presented with urethral catheter because of chronic or refractory retention. Twenty patients voided preoperatively during PFS with mean detrusor pressure (Pdet) at Qmax 23.97 ± 25.54 cmH2O and the mean BCI was 51.04 ± 23.86, while twelve patients did not void with mean maximum Pdet 21.75 ± 7.34. After 6 month follow-up, there was significant improvement in IPSS, Qmax, and detrusor contractility (Pdet at Qmax and BCI) postoperatively in all patients, and there was no significant postoperative improvement of post-voiding residual urine (p value 0.92). Finally, 11 patients voided normally without RU, 7 patients needed timed triple voiding with crede maneuver and small RU, and 14 patients needed CIC. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant improvements in IPSS, detrusor contractility, and urine flow after TURP in patients with BPH and weak bladder contractility, although the risk of postoperative urine retention in approximately 43% of cases and needed CIC.

Effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on kidney growth in children.

PURPOSE: We investigated whether shock wave lithotripsy affects kidney growth in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective controlled study included 150 children with renal stones who presented for shock wave lithotripsy between March 2005 and February 2010 (group A). The control arm included 100 children without any urological problems who were enrolled in the study after obtaining written maternal consent (group B). All children in both groups underwent abdominal ultrasound to assess renal size (bipolar renal length), which was repeated after 6 months for group A and after 1 year for both groups. RESULTS: Bipolar renal size in group A increased significantly at 6 months and 1 year after shock wave lithotripsy. Renal growth did not differ based on patient age at shock wave lithotripsy (p = 0.472), number of shock wave lithotripsy sessions (p = 0.65) or number of stones (p = 0.405). There was no significant difference between the rate of kidney growth in children who underwent shock wave lithotripsy during the year of the study and normal controls. CONCLUSIONS: Shock wave lithotripsy has no deleterious effect on the normal rate of renal growth in children. This outcome is not affected by either the number of stones or the age of the child at shock wave lithotripsy.

Evaluation of renal function in children undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

PURPOSE: The effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on the growing kidneys of young children has always been a concern. We determined whether shock wave lithotripsy causes renal parenchymal scarring or affects glomerular filtration rate in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 100 children with renal stones who presented to the shock wave lithotripsy unit at our institution between March 2005 and March 2008. A total of 28 children had multiple stones in the same kidney. All children with bilateral renal stones had 1 kidney cleared of stones by percutaneous nephrolithotomy before undergoing shock wave lithotripsy. A total of 138 stones were subjected to shock wave lithotripsy. All children underwent radionuclide scan of the renal parenchyma using dimercapto-succinic acid, and glomerular filtration rate was estimated using diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and 6 months afterward. Children with renal scarring due to previous surgery or vesicoureteral reflux were excluded from the study. The number of shock wave lithotripsy sessions to achieve stone-free status and the dose of shock waves used were recorded for each patient. RESULTS: No patient demonstrated renal parenchymal scarring on dimercapto-succinic acid scan or any statistically significant change in glomerular filtration rate on diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid scan up to 6 months after shock wave lithotripsy. CONCLUSIONS: Shock wave lithotripsy is a safe modality for treating renal calculous disease in children up to 16 years old, with no impact on long-term kidney function.

Pediatric and adolescent transperineal anastomotic urethroplasty.

PURPOSE: Pediatric urethral stricture disease represents a significant surgical challenge because of smaller pelvic confines, decreased caliber and increased tissue fragility. Operative series of pediatric urethral reconstruction usually involve small numbers. In this study, we examined the outcome of open reconstructive techniques for pediatric and adolescent patients with posterior urethral distraction injuries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 2002 and September 2005, 15 patients from Kasr ElAini hospital presenting with posterior urethral distraction defects due to motor vehicle accidents were included in our study. Their age ranged between 5 and 17 years (mean 12.5). We used the progressive perineal approach to achieve a tension-free spatulated anastomosis. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 28.4 months. Initial and ultimate success rates were 80 and 86.6%, respectively. Other than re-stricture, one child had a bladder stone treated by cystolithotomy 6 months after surgery. No penile curvature, shortening or urethral diverticulae were noted during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Using the appropriate modern guidelines of urethroplasty, consistent success can be achieved in pediatric and adolescent patients with posterior urethral injuries. Open urethral reconstruction of adolescent and pediatric strictures provides excellent long-term results with minimal morbidity. Urethral reconstruction is strongly recommended as the primary treatment option, especially in the pediatric urethral stricture population, because of the repair durability.