Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 31
Filter
1.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 24(2): 633-639, 2023 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36853314

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: 'Interval breast cancer' describes a malignancy that is diagnosed after a negative screening mammogram. Open disclosure is a process of addressing a negative health outcome that includes an apology and an opportunity for the client to discuss concerns. BreastScreen Western Australia has implemented a policy of open disclosure. The purpose of this study was to gain an understanding of clients' experience with interval cancer and their attitude towards the screening programme by conducting a thematic analysis of written responses from women participating in the open disclosure process. METHODS: Women experiencing an interval cancer diagnosis between 2011 and 2020 were sent a questionnaire by mail. It included two broad questions with free-text responses. A qualitative analysis of the responses was conducted using an inductive approach. Responses were de-identified and data were thematically analysed and presented using verbatim quotations. RESULTS: Five themes emerged in response to "what could we have done better?": 'nothing,' 'broaden scope,' 'service delivery,' 'breast density education' and 'more education' generally. Six themes emerged in response to "what did we do well?": 'staffing,' 'overall satisfaction,' 'reminders,' 'follow-up after interval cancer,' 'efficiency' and 'information and education provision.' An additional theme of 'storytelling' emerged from both questions: an opportunity for the woman to share her experience of cancer. CONCLUSION: Most women expressed positive attitudes towards the service and appreciated giving feedback in the open disclosure process. Several themes supporting the role of BreastScreen in education were identified, including providing information about breast density, breast health, and limitations of screening.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Disclosure , Western Australia , Breast , Breast Density
2.
BMC Public Health ; 22(1): 2089, 2022 11 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36384486

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Assessment of occupational exposures is an integral component of population-based studies investigating the epidemiology of occupational diseases. However, all the available methods for exposure assessment have been developed, tested and used in high-income countries. Except for a few studies examining pesticide exposures, there is limited research on whether these methods are appropriate for assessing exposure in LMICs. The aim of this study is to compare a task-specific algorithm-based method (OccIDEAS) to a job-specific matrix method (OAsJEM) in the assessment of asthmagen exposures among healthcare workers in a high-income country and a low- and middle- income country (LMIC) to determine an appropriate assessment method for use in LMICs for future research. METHODS: Data were obtained from a national cross-sectional survey of occupational asthmagens exposure in Australia and a cross-sectional survey of occupational chemical exposure among Bhutanese healthcare workers. Exposure was assessed using OccIDEAS and the OAsJEM. Prevalence of exposure to asthmagens and inter-rater agreement were calculated. RESULTS: In Australia, the prevalence was higher for a majority of agents when assessed by OccIDEAS than by the OAsJEM (13 versus 3). OccIDEAS identified exposures to a greater number of agents (16 versus 7). The agreement as indicated by κ (Cohen's Kappa coefficient) for six of the seven agents assessed was poor to fair (0.02 to 0.37). In Bhutan, the prevalence of exposure assessed by OccIDEAS was higher for four of the seven agents and κ was poor for all the four agents assessed (-0.06 to 0.13). The OAsJEM overestimated exposures to high-level disinfectants by assigning exposures to all participants from 10 (Bhutan) and 12 (Australia) ISCO-88 codes; whereas OccIDEAS assigned exposures to varying proportions of participants from these ISCO-codes. CONCLUSION: There was poor to fair agreement in the assessment of asthmagen exposure in healthcare workers between the two methods. The OAsJEM overestimated the prevalence of certain exposures. As compared to the OAsJEM, OccIDEAS appeared to be more appropriate for evaluating cross-country exposures to asthmagens in healthcare workers due to its inherent quality of assessing task-based determinants and its versatility in being adaptable for use in different countries with different exposure circumstances.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Humans , Bhutan/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Personnel , Algorithms
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36293617

ABSTRACT

Occupational illnesses, such as cancer, cause more deaths each year than occupational accidents. Occupational carcinogens include physical, chemical, biological and organizational hazards. In the United Arab Emirates (UAE), migrant workers account for 80% of labor. Being sometimes employed as unskilled workers and more willing to work in demanding jobs, their vulnerability and exposure may be increased. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of occupational exposure to workplace carcinogens among migrant workers in the UAE. A sample of employees working in construction, cleaning, dry cleaning, mechanic workshops and hair salons were recruited and interviewed. Using OccIDEAS (an online assessment tool), participants were asked questions about their demographics, work history and regular tasks. Exposure to various carcinogens was estimated using the in-built algorithms of OccIDEAS. A sample of 1778 workers was included. The sample consisted of workers from Bangladesh (19.2%), India (31%), Nepal (4.7%), Pakistan (29.9%) and the Philippines (4.8%), with the rest from other nationalities. Overall, the prevalence of probable exposure was considerable, with the highest among drivers (96%) and the lowest among laundry workers (52%). Moderate to high exposure was found to 20 different carcinogens. Self-rated health among those who were exposed to carcinogens was significantly lower than among those not exposed (AOR = 0.783, 95% CI [0.638-0.961]). Exposure to several different carcinogens is relatively common in the UAE among migrant workers. Further strengthening policies and the implementation of tailored interventions are needed to prevent exposure to occupational carcinogens and, consequently, to combat occupational cancer in the UAE.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Occupational Diseases , Occupational Exposure , Transients and Migrants , Humans , Carcinogens , Cross-Sectional Studies , United Arab Emirates/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Neoplasms/complications
4.
J Adv Nurs ; 77(12): 4599-4611, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34081369

ABSTRACT

AIM: Aim of this study is to systematically review and synthesize available evidence to identify the association between nurse staffing methodologies and nurse and patient outcomes. DESIGN: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCES: A search of MEDLINE (EBSCO), CINAHL (EBSCO) and Web of Science was conducted for studies published in English between January 2000 and January 2020. REVIEW METHODS: The reporting of this review and narrative synthesis was guided by the preferred reporting items for systematic and meta-analysis guidelines (PRISMA) statement and data synthesis guided by the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline. The quality of each article was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-one used the mandated minimum nurse-to-patient ratio methodology and one study assessed the number of nurse hours per patient day staffing methodology. Both methodologies were mandated. All studies that reported on nurse outcomes demonstrated an improvement associated with the implementation of mandated minimum nurse-to-patient ratio, but findings related to patient outcomes were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on the impact of specific nurse staffing methodologies and patient and nurse outcomes remains highly limited. Future studies that examine the impact of specific staffing methodologies on outcomes are required to inform this fundamental area of management and practice.


Subject(s)
Nurse-Patient Relations , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Humans , Workforce
5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33807727

ABSTRACT

Health care workers are exposed to numerous workplace hazards. The implementation of safety measures in high-income countries has largely mitigated these risks. However, in many low- and middle- income countries (LMICs), resources to institute safety measures are lacking, increasing the risk of occupational exposures to these hazards. The aim of this scoping review is to map and synthesize the available research on occupational hazards among health care workers in LMICs, identify research gaps and inform policy. Searches for relevant articles were conducted in five electronic databases using a broad range of search terms. The inclusion criteria were: quantitative observational or experimental studies which examined exposure to one or more occupational hazards among health care workers in a LMCI; and the article was published in English in a peer-reviewed journal. A total of 99 studies met the inclusion criteria, and data were extracted from these studies. Large proportions of health care workers in LMICs were exposed to biological hazards (bloodborne pathogens, tuberculosis), psychosocial hazards (workplace violence, burnout, job dissatisfaction), ergonomic hazards (musculoskeletal complaints), and chemical hazards (exposure to latex and antineoplastic drugs). The implementation of risk reduction strategies was suboptimal. The majority of the literature was on biological hazards (48%), and research on other hazards was limited in comparison. Occupational safety needs to become a priority public health issue to protect health care workers in LMICs. More research is needed to understand the magnitude of the problem in these countries.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Occupational Health , Developing Countries , Health Personnel , Humans , Income , Poverty
6.
Asia Pac J Public Health ; 33(8): 870-879, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33847173

ABSTRACT

Disparities in exposure to workplace hazards exist between Maori and non-Maori workers in New Zealand, with Maori workers generally incurring poorer conditions. This study aimed to determine if these ethnic disparities are similar after migration to Australia. A national cross-sectional telephone survey asked participants what tasks they undertook in their job to assess exposure to carcinogens as well as whether they experienced ethnic discrimination, bullying, job precariousness, or job strain. A total of 389 New Zealand Caucasians and 152 Maori/Pasifika workers were recruited. After adjustment, 79% of Maori/Pasifika compared with 67% of New Zealand Caucasian workers were assessed as being exposed to at least one carcinogen at work. Maori/Pasifika workers were also more likely to report ethnic discrimination and fair or poor current health than New Zealand Caucasians. Some ethnic disparities in exposure to workplace hazards in New Zealand are apparent after migration to Australia.


Subject(s)
Transients and Migrants , Workplace , Australia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethnicity , Humans , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , New Zealand
7.
Breast ; 56: 96-102, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33647788

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of age expansion of screening (EOS) of the target age group from 50 to 69 to 50-74 in Australia, which began mid-2013, by examining screening uptake and outcomes of older women, and by identifying factors associated with continuing screening after reaching the age of 75 years. METHODS: Retrospective study using data from women aged 65+ who attended BreastScreen Western Australia between 2010 and 2017 for free mammograms. Screening uptake and screening outcomes were calculated for the periods before (2010-2012) and after (2015-2017) the age EOS to women aged 70-74. Logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with continuing screening after reaching age 75 years, while controlling for possible confounding variables. RESULTS: Age EOS increased screening uptake amongst women aged 70-74 b y 36% and amongst women ≥75 years by 3% while screening uptake in women aged 65-69 decreased by 3%. Rate of invasive screened-detected cancers significantly decreased among women aged 70-74 from 11.4/1000 screens before to 8.1/1000 screens after age EOS. Likelihood of continuing screening into age ≥75 years was higher in women who had a personal history or a family history of breast cancer, or used hormone replacement therapy within six months of screening. Women who were born outside Australia were less likely to continue screening after reaching age 75 years. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that age EOS to women aged 70-74 was effective in increasing screening uptake in this age-group but was accompanied by a moderate increase in screening uptake amongst women ≥75 years via self-referral for whom potential benefit of screening may be limited.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Age Distribution , Age Factors , Aged , Australia , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
8.
Am J Ind Med ; 63(12): 1109-1115, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33047357

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Occupational exposures to hazardous chemicals among healthcare workers can result in long-term adverse health outcomes. Research on such exposures from low- and middle-income countries is limited. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of exposures to a range of chemicals used in healthcare settings among Bhutanese healthcare workers. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among healthcare workers (n = 370) working in three hospitals in the western region of Bhutan. Demographic and occupational information was collected, and exposures to asthmagens, carcinogens, ototoxic and other agents were assessed using a web-based tool. The prevalence of exposure to these chemicals was calculated and the circumstances resulting in such exposures were examined. RESULTS: The prevalence of exposure to one or more asthmagen, carcinogen, and ototoxic agent was 98.7%, 28.1%, and 7.6%, respectively; and was 6.2% for anesthetic gases and 2.2% for antineoplastic drugs. The most common exposures were to latex, and cleaning and disinfecting agents in the asthmagens group; formaldehyde in the carcinogens group; and p-xylene among ototoxic agents. The circumstances resulting in exposures were using latex gloves, using bleach and chlorhexidine for cleaning, using formaldehyde as a disinfectant and in the laboratory, and using p-xylene in the laboratory. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that a large proportion of Bhutanese healthcare workers are occupationally exposed to chemicals linked to chronic diseases, with exposure prevalence higher than in high-income countries. The study provides information that can be used to formulate policies and to implement control measures to protect healthcare workers.


Subject(s)
Hazardous Substances/analysis , Health Care Sector/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Bhutan/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hazardous Substances/toxicity , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Prevalence , Young Adult
10.
Occup Environ Med ; 2020 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32948666

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Workers can be exposed to a range of different carcinogenic agents in the workplace. However, previous studies have often focused on prevalence of exposure to a single carcinogen, resulting in substantial knowledge gaps regarding the extent of multiple exposures in the workplace. This study aims to investigate the current prevalence of occupational exposure to multiple carcinogens among exposed workers in Australia. METHODS: The data for this study come from the Australian Work Exposures Study, a nationwide cross-sectional telephone survey of Australian workers aged between 18 and 65. Information was collected about the respondents' current employment and numerous demographic factors using a web-based application (Occupational Integrated Database Exposure Assessment System) to conduct the interview, with predefined algorithms used to automatically assign exposures to carcinogens based on the respondents' job tasks. RESULTS: The majority (81%) of exposed respondents were assessed as being probably exposed to more than one carcinogen, and 26% reported exposure to five or more carcinogens. We found that after adjusting for occupation, exposure to multiple carcinogens was more likely among male respondents, while older workers (aged between 55 and 65) were less likely to be exposed to multiple carcinogens. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides information on the prevalence of exposure to multiple carcinogens in the general population that has not previously been reported. This information could be useful for the intervention and control of occupational exposures to the prioritised carcinogens identified in this study.

11.
Int J Occup Environ Med ; 11(3): 128-139, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32683425

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Collection of reliable and valid occupational history data is of utmost importance to assess work-related exposures and their health effects. Few standardized questionnaires are available for the collection of occupational history data in low-and-middle income countries. OBJECTIVE: To adapt and test a validated questionnaire developed in the United States by the National Institute of Safety and Health, in order to assess occupational chemical exposures among health care workers in Bhutan. METHODS: The questionnaire was first adapted to suit the Bhutanese context with the advice of an expert review committee. 30 health care workers then completed the questionnaire at baseline and 10-14 days later. Test-retest reliability was assessed by calculating Cohen's κ and percentage agreement. RESULTS: The questionnaire had high test-retest reliability. Cohen's κ ranged from 0.61 to 1.00, and percentage agreement ranged from 86.7% to 100%. Further adaptations included omitting questions on chemicals not available in Bhutan. CONCLUSION: The adapted questionnaire is appropriate for assessing occupational chemical exposures among health care workers in Bhutan.


Subject(s)
Hazardous Substances/toxicity , Health Personnel , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Adult , Bhutan/epidemiology , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Personnel/psychology , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , United States , Young Adult
12.
Am J Ind Med ; 63(9): 803-816, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32573821

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Disparities in exposure to occupational hazards may be linked to social position as well as the type of job a person holds. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of exposure to workplace hazards among three migrant worker groups and to assess whether social disparities in exposure for these groups remain after adjusting for occupational characteristics. METHODS: Data were collected in 2017/2018 from 1630 Australian workers born in New Zealand, India, and the Philippines. Weighted estimated prevalence of exposure to 10 carcinogens and four psychosocial hazards (discrimination, job strain, vulnerability, and insecurity) was calculated for sociodemographics and occupation. Regression estimated the likelihood of exposure by sociodemographics after adjustment for occupational characteristics. RESULTS: Exposure to workplace hazards ranged from 11.7% (discrimination) to 61.2% (exposed to at least one carcinogen). Compared with workers born in India, New Zealand born workers were over twice as likely to be exposed to diesel engine exhaust (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.60) and 60% more likely to be exposed to at least one carcinogen (aOR = 1.60) but less likely to be exposed to any psychosocial hazard. Social disparities by country of birth, sex, age, education, and number of years in Australia, as well as company size, employment type, and hours, worked remained associated with greater likelihood of reporting one or more workplace hazards after adjusting for occupational characteristics. CONCLUSION: Examining sociodemographic as well as occupational characteristics helps to clarify groups most likely to be exposed to workplace hazards who can be hidden when examining occupational characteristics alone.


Subject(s)
Carcinogens, Environmental/analysis , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Australia/epidemiology , Cluster Analysis , Female , Health Status Disparities , Humans , India/ethnology , Male , Middle Aged , New Zealand/ethnology , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Philippines/ethnology , Prevalence , Regression Analysis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workplace/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
13.
Occup Environ Med ; 77(8): 564-567, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32467312

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increased mammographic density is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer. Night shiftwork and its related factors, which include light at night, phase shift and sleep disruption, are believed to increase breast cancer risk however, their effects on mammographic density have barely been studied. METHODS: This study included 1821 women enrolled in the Breast Cancer Environment and Employment Study between 2009 and 2011. Mammographic density was measured using the Cumulus software program. The association of night shiftwork factors with square root transformed absolute dense area (DA) and percentage dense area (PDA) were modelled using linear regression adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: Ever doing graveyard shiftwork (between 24:00 and 05:00 hours) was not associated with PDA (ß=-0.10; 95% CI -0.27 to 0.08)) and DA (ß=-0.12; 95% CI -0.33 to 0.09)). No association was found between night shiftwork related factors (light at night, phase shift and sleep disturbance) with PDA or DA. CONCLUSIONS: Shiftwork and its related factors are not associated with mammographic density. Using high-quality, comprehensive shiftwork data from a large population-based breast cancer case-control study, this study suggests that mammographic density does not play a role in the relationship between shiftwork and breast cancer risk.


Subject(s)
Breast Density , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Shift Work Schedule/statistics & numerical data , Breast/diagnostic imaging , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Mammography , Risk Factors , Western Australia/epidemiology
14.
Am J Ind Med ; 63(7): 624-633, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32236973

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers are occupationally exposed to various hazardous chemicals and agents that can potentially result in long-term adverse health effects. These exposures have not been comprehensively examined at a population level. The aim of this study was to examine occupational exposures to a wide range of asthmagens, carcinogens, and ototoxic agents among healthcare workers in Australia. METHODS: Data were collected as part of the Australian Work Exposures Studies, which were computer-assisted telephone surveys conducted in 2011, 2014, and 2016 to assess the prevalence of occupational exposures to carcinogens, asthmagens, and ototoxic agents, respectively, among Australian workers. Using data on healthcare workers, the prevalence of exposures to these agents was calculated and associations of demographic variables and occupation groups with exposure status were examined. RESULTS: The prevalence of exposure to at least one asthmagen, carcinogen, and ototoxic agent was 92.3%, 50.7%, and 44.6%, respectively. The most common exposures were to (a) cleaning and sterilizing agents in the asthmagen group; (b) shift work in the carcinogen group; and (c) toluene and p-xylene among ototoxic agents. Exposure varied by occupation, with exposure to carcinogens and ototoxic agents highest among personal carers and exposure to carcinogens most likely among nursing professionals and health and welfare support workers. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that a substantial proportion of Australian healthcare workers are occupationally exposed to asthmagens, carcinogens, and ototoxic agents. These exposures are more common among certain occupational groups. The information provided by this study will be useful in prioritizing and implementing control strategies.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Occupational/analysis , Health Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Adolescent , Adult , Asthma, Occupational/epidemiology , Asthma, Occupational/etiology , Australia/epidemiology , Carcinogens/analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Ototoxicity/epidemiology , Ototoxicity/etiology , Prevalence , Young Adult
15.
J Med Screen ; 27(2): 77-84, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31581885

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Various lifestyle and occupational factors have been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, but there is limited research investigating the relationship between these factors and participation in breast cancer screening. This study explores the associations between lifestyle and occupational factors and participation in breast mammography screening among women living in Western Australia. METHODS: This study involved 1705 women aged 40 and older who participated as controls in the Breast Cancer Environment and Employment Study conducted in Western Australia. Self-reported questionnaire data were collected on participation in mammography screening, demographic factors, and lifestyle and occupational variables (smoking, physical activity, alcohol consumption, body mass index, use of contraceptive pill and hormone replacement therapy, breastfeeding, occupation, and participation in shift work). Multivariate modified Poisson regression was used to identify variables associated with ever participation in breast mammography screening. RESULTS: Just over 88% of women reported having ever had a mammogram. Likelihood of having ever had a mammogram was higher among women who had ever used hormone replacement therapy (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) = 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.07). Women who worked in clerical occupations (aPR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11) or home duties (aPR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.00-1.11) were also more likely to report having ever had a mammogram compared with those in professional or technical occupations. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in mammography screening was found to differ by lifestyle and occupational factors. These results have important implications for public health strategies on improving screening participation.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Female , Hormone Replacement Therapy , Humans , Life Style , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Western Australia
16.
Int J Occup Environ Med ; 10(4): 159-173, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31586381

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The palm oil industry is the largest contributor to global production of oils and fats. Indonesia and Malaysia are the largest producers of palm oil. More than a million workers are employed in this industry, yet there is a lack of information on their occupational health and safety. OBJECTIVE: To identify and summarize occupational hazards among oil palm plantation workers. METHODS: A search was carried out in June 2018 in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Ovid. Relevant publications were identified by a systematic search of four databases and relevant journals. Publications were included if they examined occupational hazards in oil palm plantation workers. RESULTS: 941 publications were identified; of these, 25 studies were found eligible to be included in the final review. Of the 25 studies examined, 19 were conducted in Malaysia, 2 in Costa Rica, and one each in Ghana, Indonesia, Myanmar, Papua New Guinea, and Cameroon. Oil palm plantation workers were found to be at risk of musculoskeletal conditions, injuries, psychosocial disorders, and infectious diseases such as malaria and leptospirosis. In addition, they have potential exposure to paraquat and other pesticides. CONCLUSION: In light of the potential of palm oil for use as a biofuel, this is an industry with strong growth potential. The workers are exposed to various occupational hazards. Further research and interventions are necessary to improve the working conditions of this already vast and growing workforce.


Subject(s)
Food Industry , Occupational Exposure , Occupational Health , Palm Oil , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , Cameroon/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Costa Rica/epidemiology , Food Industry/standards , Food Industry/statistics & numerical data , Food Safety , Ghana/epidemiology , Humans , Indonesia/epidemiology , Malaysia/epidemiology , Myanmar/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Health/statistics & numerical data , Palm Oil/adverse effects , Papua New Guinea/epidemiology , Pesticides/toxicity , Plant Oils/adverse effects
17.
Prev Med ; 126: 105777, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31319115

ABSTRACT

This study explores the associations between lifestyle and occupational factors and participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among men and women aged 50 and over and living in Australia. We used weighted data from the Australian National Health Survey 2014-15 to produce population estimates. Lifestyle variables investigated were smoking, physical activity, alcohol consumption, fruit and vegetable consumption, and body mass index, while the occupational variables were labour force status, occupation, and participation in shift work. Using weighted data, 1,990,287 men (55%) and 1,898,232 women (49%) reported ever-screening for CRC. Female current smokers were less likely to report ever-screening for CRC (adjusted RR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.96), as were men who were less physically active (aRR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.97), reported no alcohol consumption (aRR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.91), and reported eating more vegetables (aRR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.99). When lifestyle behaviours were combined into a healthy lifestyle index score, a significant trend was observed for both men and women, whereby those who reported engaging in more healthy behaviours were more likely to have ever-screened for CRC (p = .027 men; p < .001 women). No associations were observed between CRC screening and occupational variables. This is the first comprehensive assessment of the lifestyle and occupational factors associated with participation in CRC screening among men and women in Australia. Participation in CRC screening was greater among those engaging in more healthy behaviours, suggesting that an individual's pattern of lifestyle behaviours may be important in determining screening participation. These results have important implications for public health strategies on improving CRC screening participation.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Health Behavior , Life Style , Aged , Australia/epidemiology , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/psychology , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupations , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Smoking/epidemiology
18.
Occup Environ Med ; 76(11): 827-837, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31302607

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Animal farming entails a variety of potential exposures, including infectious agents, endotoxins and pesticides, which may play a role in the aetiology of lymphohaematopoietic cancers (LHCs). The aim of this study was to assess whether farming specific animal species is associated with the risk of overall LHC or its subtypes. METHODS: Data from three prospective cohort studies in the USA, France and Norway which are part of the Agricultural Cohort consortium and which collected information about animal farming and cancer were used. Analyses included 316 270 farmers and farm workers. Adjusted Cox models were used to investigate the associations of 13 histological subtypes of LHC (n=3282) with self-reported livestock (cattle, pigs and sheep/goats) and poultry (ever/never and numbers raised) farming. Cohort-specific HRs were combined using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Ever animal farming in general or farming specific animal species was not meta-associated with overall LHC. The risk of myeloid malignancies decreased with increasing number of livestock (p trend=0.01). Increased risk of myeloproliferative neoplasms was seen with increasing number of sheep/goats (p trend <0.01), while a decreased risk was seen with increasing number of livestock (p trend=0.02). Between cohorts, we observed heterogeneity in the association of type of animal farmed and various LHC subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale study of three prospective agricultural cohorts showed no association between animal farming and LHC risk, but few associations between specific animal species and LHC subtypes were observed. The observed differences in associations by countries warrant further investigations.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry , Farmers/statistics & numerical data , Hematologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Animals , Cohort Studies , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Livestock , Male , Middle Aged , Norway/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Poultry , United States/epidemiology
19.
Am J Ind Med ; 62(4): 352-356, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30680755

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is limited information on whether the prevalence of exposure to workplace carcinogens varies among shift workers and non-shift workers. METHODS: This analysis used data from the Australian Work Exposures Study-Cancer, a telephone survey which examined exposure to carcinogens in the workplace. Workers were classified as shift workers if they indicated that their usual roster ever included work between the hours of midnight and 5 am. Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate the adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% confidence internals (CIs). RESULTS: Among the 5425 workers, 6.88% reported being exposed to shift work. Overall, shift workers were more likely to be exposed to any carcinogen (aPR = 1.16; 95% 1.06-1.26) and to specific carcinogens such as asbestos (aPR = 1.93; 95% 1.33-2.83) than non-shift workers. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that there are differences in exposure to carcinogenic agents among shift and non-shift workers, and so there is a need for prevention programs in order to reduce these discrepancies.


Subject(s)
Carcinogens , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Shift Work Schedule/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Asbestos , Australia/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Chromium , Dust , Female , Formaldehyde , Humans , Lead , Male , Middle Aged , Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons , Radiation, Ionizing , Silicon Dioxide , Tobacco Smoke Pollution , Ultraviolet Rays , Vehicle Emissions , Wood , Young Adult
20.
Environ Int ; 121(Pt 2): 1106-1112, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30376997

ABSTRACT

Researchers still lack consensus on the association between exposure to DDT and the risk of breast cancer. One reason could be that the measurements of DDT obtained during or near the time of diagnosis may not reflect exposure during the etiologically relevant time period in a woman's life. This study undertook an ecological analysis to investigate whether exposure to DDT among cohort born between 1951 and 1959 (i.e. age 0-5 years) and who reached the age 50-54 years during 2001-2013 had an increased risk of breast cancer in adulthood. To do this, we used the number of DDT sprays in each township during the anti-malaria campaign in Taiwan in the 1950s as a proxy for direct DDT exposure. The DDT sprays were then linked to the township female breast cancer incidence rate in the 2000s when the birth cohorts had reached age 50-54 years. Insurance claims data were used to identify breast cancer cases during 1996-2013. Zero-Inflated Poisson regression was performed to estimate the effect of DDT sprays on the breast cancer incidence rate. The analysis was based on a total of 9 birth cohorts (1951-1959) in 349 townships who had lived at least up to age 50. On average, one DDT spray experienced during age 0-5 years was associated with an increase of 8 more female breast cancer cases per 100,000 during age 50-54. The effect appears to increase with the number of sprays. Our finding suggests that DDT exposure in early childhood could raise the risk of breast cancer in adulthood.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , DDT/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Taiwan/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...