ABSTRACT
AIM: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of administering double-dose tamsulosin (0.8 mg) for treating patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who have not responded to the standard single dose of tamsulosin (0.4 mg) and are deemed unsuitable for transurethral resection (TUR) intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2022 and July 2023, we prospectively analyzed 111 patients who were experiencing severe BPH symptoms. These patients received a double dose of tamsulosin for one month. We collected baseline characteristics such as age, body mass index, and underlying medical conditions. Various parameters including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volume, peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), voided volume, and post-void residual volume were evaluated before and after treatment. RESULTS: All 111 patients completed the study. The mean age, PSA level, and prostate volume were 63.12 ± 4.83 years, 3.42 ± 0.93 ng/ml, and 50.37 ± 19.23 ml, respectively. Of these patients, 93 showed improvement in Qmax, post-void residual volume, and IPSS score (p-value = 0.001). The total IPSS score and total Qmax improved from 24.03 ± 2.49 and 7.72 ± 1.64 ml/sec to 16.41 ± 3.84 and 12.08 ± 2.37 ml/sec, respectively. CONCLUSION: Double-dose 0.8mg tamsulosin as an alpha-blocker therapy appears to be a viable temporary management option for BPH patients who have not responded to the standard single dose 0.4mg tamsulosin and are not suitable candidates for TUR intervention.
Subject(s)
Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Tamsulosin , Humans , Tamsulosin/administration & dosage , Tamsulosin/therapeutic use , Male , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Prostatic Hyperplasia/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Aged , Prospective Studies , Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome , Drug Administration ScheduleABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We compared the effect of chemical disinfection (CIDEX® OPA) and low-temperature hydrogen peroxide gas plasma (STERRAD NX) on two brand new digital flexible ureteroscope (DFU) (Flex-Xc) using subjective and objective parameters. METHODS: Over 11-month period, all flexible ureteroscopic procedures that fulfill the inclusion criteria were done by two brand new flexible ureteroscopes and were prospectively evaluated. Intraoperative data included total operative time, laser power and duration, stone criteria and subjective evaluation of the procedure as well as visibility and maneuverability scores were reported. The end point of the study was when the scope was deemed by the surgeon as unable to perform the procedure; when leak test is positive. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients were randomized either for the first flexible ureteroscope disinfected using Cidex® OPA (n = 59, 67%) or second ureteroscope sterilized with Sterrad NX (n = 29, 33%). Intraoperative, the first DFU was significantly used with a total operative time of approximately 49 h compared to the second one (p < 0.001). In the same context, laser power parameters were significantly different among the two groups (p = 0.003). The subjective evaluation of the procedure, maneuverability, visibility scores, laser duration, stone burden and post-operative infection rate were statistically insignificant between both groups. At the end point of the study, the deflection in up and downward directions for both DFU were measured. CONCLUSIONS: The durability and longevity of the DFU is strongly related to the sterilization method. Our findings suggest that CIDEX® OPA should prioritize Sterrad in sterilization of DFU.
