ABSTRACT
Background@#With the emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and inability of healthcare systems to control the disease, various therapeutic theories with controversial responses have been proposed. Plasmapheresis was administered as a medication.However, the knowledge of its efficacy and indications is inadequate. This study evaluated the use of plasmapheresis in critically ill patients with cancer. @*Methods@#This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 86 patients with malignancies, including a control group (N=41) and an intervention group (N=45) with severe COVID-19 during 2020-21. Both groups were treated with routine medications for COVID-19 management according to national guidelines, and plasmapheresis was applied to the intervention group. C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase, hemoglobin, and white blood cell, polymorphonuclear, lymphocyte, and platelet levels were measured at admission and at the end of plasmapheresis. Other variables included neutrophil recovery, intensive care unit admission, intubation requirements, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization outcomes. @*Results@#CRP (P ＜0.001), D-dimer (P ＜0.001), ferritin (P =0.039), and hemoglobin (P =0.006) levels were significantly different between the groups after the intervention. Neutrophil recovery was remarkably higher in the case than in the control group (P ＜0.001). However, plasmapheresis did not affect the length of hospital stay (P =0.076), which could have significantly increased survival rates (P ＜0.001). @*Conclusion@#Based on the study findings, plasmapheresis led to a significant improvement in laboratory markers and survival rate in patients with severe COVID-19. These findings reinforce the value of plasmapheresis in cancer patients as a critical population suffering from neutropenia and insufficient immune responses.
ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 genome surveillance projects provide a good measure of transmission and monitor the circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants at regional and global scales. Iran is one of the most affected countries still involved with the virus circulating in at least five significant disease waves, as of September 2021. Complete genome sequencing of 50 viral isolates in an early phase of outbreak in Iran, shed light on the origins and circulating lineages at that time. As part of a genomic surveillance program, we provided an additional 319 complete genomes from October 2020 onwards. The current study is the report of complete SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences of Iran in the March 2020-May 2021 time interval. We aimed to characterize the genetic diversity of SARS-CoV-2 in Iran over one year. Overall, 35 different lineages and 8 clades were detected. Temporal dynamics of the prominent SARS-CoV-2 clades/lineages circulating in Iran is comparable to the global perspective and introduces the 19A clade (B.4) dominating the first disease wave, followed by 20A (B.1.36), 20B (B.1.1.413), 20I (B.1.1.7) clades, dominating second, third and fourth disease waves, respectively. We observed a mixture of circulating 20A (B.1.36), 20B (B.1.1.413), 20I (B.1.1.7) clades in winter 2021, paralleled in a diminishing manner for 20A/20B and a growing rise for 20I, eventually prompting the 4th outbreak peak. Furthermore, our study provides evidence on the entry of the Delta variant in April 2021, leading to the 5th disease wave in summer 2021. Three lineages are highlighted as hallmarks of SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in Iran; B4, dominating early periods of the epidemic, B.1.1.413 (specific B.1.1 lineage carrying a combination of [D138Y-S477N-D614G] spike mutations) in October 2020-February 2021, and the co-occurrence of [I100T-L699I] spike mutations in half of B.1.1.7 sequences mediating the fourth peak. Continuous monthly monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 genome mutations led to the detection of 1577 distinct nucleotide mutations, in which the top recurrent mutations were D614G, P323L, R203K/G204R, 3037C>T, and 241C>T; the renowned combination of mutations in G and GH clades. The most frequent spike mutation is D614G followed by 13 other frequent mutations based on the prominent circulating lineages; B.1.1.7 (H69_V70del, Y144del, N501Y, A570D, P681H, T716I, S982A, D1118H, I100T, and L699I), B.1.1.413 (D138Y, S477N) and B.1.36 (I210del). In brief, mutation surveillance in this study provided a real-time comprehensive picture of the SARS-CoV-2 mutation profile in Iran, which is beneficial for evaluating the magnitude of the epidemic and assessment of vaccine and therapeutic efficiency in this population.
