EUS and EUS-FNA diagnosis of suspected pancreatic cystic neoplasms: Is the sum of the parts greater than the CEA?

BACKGROUND: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is suggested as the single most useful EUS/EUS-FNA derived test for the diagnosis of mucinous pancreatic cysts. STUDY AIMS: To investigate the yield and diagnostic performance of EUS/EUS-FNA on an intention to diagnose basis and to determine the utility of the recommended CEA and amylase cut-off values. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database of 433 procedures performed in a 10 year period. Diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA was determined in 133 procedures with a definite diagnosis. RESULTS: CEA value was determined in significantly fewer procedures (58.6%) than EUS diagnosis was stated (83.4%; p < 0.0001), cyst fluid appearance recorded (89.4%) or adequate sample for cytology obtained (76.7%; p < 0.005). Median CEA was significantly higher in mucinous cysts than non-mucinous (175 ng/ml vs 3 ng/ml, p < 0.0001) and in malignant cysts compared to benign (8945 ng/ml vs 93 ng/ml, p < 0.001). On an intention-to-diagnose analysis, a CEA cut-off of 110 ng/ml was significantly less accurate (42.8%) than EUS diagnosis (67.7%), cytology (58.6%) or aspirate appearance (66.9%; p < 0.05 for all comparisons). However, the combination of EUS diagnosis, cytology and CEA provided higher sensitivity (91%), specificity (75%) and accuracy (85.7%) than each component test alone (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Median amylase was significantly higher in benign compared to high-risk mucinous cysts ((11,429IU/L vs. 113IU/L; p < 0.05. CONCLUSION: The combination of EUS, cytology and CEA performed well. Malignant cysts had a higher CEA value than benign cysts. On an intention to diagnose basis a CEA cut-off of 110 ng/ml performed poorly.

Impact of recipient and donor nonimmunologic factors on the outcome of deceased donor kidney transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To study the influence of nonimmunologic factors on the outcome of extended criteria deceased donor (DD) kidney transplants. METHOD: This is a retrospective study of DD transplantation carried out from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2007, to investigate the impact on graft survival and function of donor renal function at retrieval, cold ischemia time (CIT), delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection episodes (ARE), age, and weight of donors and recipients, transplant center activities, cause of donor death, donor-recipient gender pairing and size of the donating intensive care unit (ICU). RESULTS: At retrieval, the frequency of donors with a creatinine clearance <60 mL/min, using the Cockcroft-Gault formula, and age >40 years were 31.7% and 32%, respectively. CIT > 24 hours, DGF, and ARE occurred in 27.1%, 33.4%, and 16.5% of cases, respectively. The overall 1- and 5-year graft and patient survival rates were 88% and 79.8% and 96.6% and 92.3%, respectively. The graft function was inferior with occurrences of ARE (P = .0001), DGF (P = .0001), CIT > 20 hours (P = .005), nontraumatic the donor death (P = .022), and donor ICUs bed capacity <20 (P = .03). The odds ratio (OR) for graft loss with DGF, ARE, and donors right kidneys were 7.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6-13.4; P = .0001), 4.47 (95% CI, 2.6-7.6; P = .0001) and 1.7 (95% CI, 1-2.8; P = .045), respectively. Graft function was not influenced by donor renal function at retrieval, donor weight, or donor- recipient gender pairings. CONCLUSION: CIT and ARE had an impact on both graft survival and function. DGF and cerebrovascular accidents as the cause of donor death negatively affected graft function during follow-up. ICU center experience had a positive impact on graft survival. Patient survival was affected by recipient age >50 years and female to male donation versus other gender pairings. Neither donor age nor acute terminal rise in the donor serum creatinine affected graft function or survival, or patient mortality.

Successful use of kidneys from deceased donors with acute renal failure.

BACKGROUND: Kidneys from deceased donors with acute renal failure are not widely used. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes for recipients of kidneys from donors with acute renal failure at organ recovery with outcomes for recipients of kidneys from donors with normal serum levels of creatinine. METHODS: Records of deceased donors and recipients of their organs at the Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation from 2003 to 2005 were reviewed. A total of 33 donors (donating 65 kidneys to 65 recipients) with elevated serum levels of creatinine (>1.7 mg/dL) and 94 donors (donating 188 kidneys to 188 recipients) with normal (<1.1 mg/dL) serum levels of creatinine at organ recovery and their respective recipients were compared. Both groups had normal creatinine levels at admission. RESULTS: Recipients in both groups had similar renal function at discharge and follow-up. Delayed graft function occurred more often (P= .009) in the recipients of kidneys from donors with acute renal failure (47.7%) than in recipients of kidneys from donors with normal creatinine levels (29.8%). Elevation of serum level of creatinine at organ recovery did not correlate significantly with kidney function at discharge or last follow-up or with graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Survival of patients or grafts at 1, 2, and 3 years did not differ significantly between the recipients in the 2 groups. Only the frequency of delayed graft function differed between the 2 groups.