Risk factors for post-polypectomy bleeding; a retrospective case-control study of a high-volume colonoscopy center.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) remains an uncommon although serious complication of colonoscopy. The aim of this study is to determine the PPB-prevalence in a secondary care hospital and its associated risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected data from 581 patients, with the removal of 1593 polyps between August 2017 and August 2019. A univariate binary logistic regression analysis was conducted retrospectively. RESULTS: PPB occurred in only 10 cases, representing 1.7% of patients: immediate in 1.2% and delayed in 0.5%. The number of removed polyps per patient [4.5 (SD 2.59) for hemorrhagic vs. 2.74 (SD 1.98) for non-hemorrhagic group] and the propofol dose [232 mg (SD 93.07) for hemorrhagic vs. 133 mg (SD 57.28) for non-hemorrhagic group] were relevant patient-related risk factors. The polyp-based analysis showed the polyp size [18.4 mm (SD 10.44) for hemorrhagic vs. 4.42 mm (SD 4.29) for non-hemorrhagic group], the morphology [wide-based: OR 24.83 (95 % CI 2.76 - 223.44), pedunculated: OR 56.67 (95 % CI 5.03 - 638.29)], the location at ileocecal valve [OR 20.48, 95 % CI 1.81 - 231.97)], and the polypectomy method [hot snare piecemeal with epinephrine injection: OR 75.38 (95 % CI 7.67 - 741.21)] as significant risk factors for PPB, too. CONCLUSIONS: The low rate of PPB confirms the safety of the procedure in non-tertiary, high-volume colonoscopy centers. The number of polyps removed per patient, the polyp size, morphology and location, as well as the sedation dose and the method of polypectomy were shown as relevant risk factors.

Analysis of Ascites-Challenged Blood in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis Using Rotational Thromboelastometry: How Robust Is the Evidence on Ascites-Attributed Fibrinolysis?

INTRODUCTION: For over 30 years, ascites has been postulated to facilitate fibrinolysis in patients with liver cirrhosis. In contrast to previous research employing conventional coagulation tests, this study aimed to characterize hemostatic interactions between blood and ascites using the rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM). METHODS: Blood samples - pure or mixed with ascites in a ratio of 1:1 - from cirrhotic patients (n = 10) were subjected to ROTEM analysis. In addition, a negative control group was built with cirrhotic patients (n = 10) whose blood was mixed with physiologic sodium chloride (0.9% NaCl) solution in a ratio of 1:1. Subsequently, ROTEM measurements were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: During ascites challenge, clotting time (CT, measured in seconds) was significantly prolonged in EXTEM (blood: 70.40 ± 20.40 vs. ascites/blood: 109.8 ± 47.7) and APTEM (blood: 66.50 ± 14.55 vs. ascites/blood: 138.7 ± 105.8), likely reflecting a dilution effect. However, CT in INTEM remained unchanged, suggesting a sustained intrinsic pathway function. Maximal clot firmness (measured in millimeters) in FIBTEM decreased significantly (blood: 14.70 ± 9.55 vs. ascites/blood: 6.00 ± 5.66), thus indicating depletion of fibrinogen in ascites. Strikingly, maximum lysis (measured in %) significantly decreased in EXTEM (blood: 9.30 ± 2.79 vs. ascites/blood: 5.50 ± 2.84), APTEM (blood: 8.50 ± 3.10 vs. ascites/blood: 5.60 ± 2.88), and INTEM (blood: 7.50 ± 2.27 vs. ascites/blood: 5.10 ± 3.48). CONCLUSIONS: ROTEM provided new evidence that ascites may not primarily induce fibrinolysis in cirrhotic patients. This finding seems to be of significant importance for the clinical management of cirrhotic patients experiencing complications, for example, abdominal hemorrhage after liver biopsy or paracentesis; here, replacement of prothrombin complex concentrates and/or fibrinogen concentrates may prove more beneficial than the use of fresh frozen plasma or antifibrinolytic drugs.