Pulmonary Artery Denervation for Patients With Residual Pulmonary Hypertension After Pulmonary Endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary artery denervation (PADN) procedure has not been applied to patients with residual chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the safety and efficacy of PADN using remote magnetic navigation in patients with residual CTEPH after PEA. METHODS: Fifty patients with residual CTEPH despite medical therapy at least 6 months after PEA, who had mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥25 mm Hg or pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) > 400 dyn‧s‧cm-5 based on right heart catheterization were randomized to treatment with PADN (PADN group; n = 25) using remote magnetic navigation for ablation or medical therapy with riociguat (MED group; n = 25). In the MED group, a sham procedure with mapping but no ablation was performed. The primary endpoint was PVR at 12 months after randomization. Key secondary endpoint included 6-min walk test. RESULTS: After PADN procedure, 2 patients (1 in each group) developed groin hematoma that resolved without any consequences. At 12 months, mean PVR reduction was 258 ± 135 dyn‧s‧cm-5 in the PADN group versus 149 ± 73 dyn‧s‧cm-5 in the MED group, mean between-group difference was 109 dyn‧s‧cm-5 (95% confidence interval: 45 to 171; p = 0.001). The 6-min walk test distance was significantly increased in the PADN group as compared to distance in the MED group (470 ± 84 m vs. 399 ± 116 m, respectively; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: PADN in patients with residual CTEPH resulted in substantial reduction of PVR at 12 months of follow-up, accompanied by improved 6-min walk test.

Long-term suppression of atrial fibrillation by botulinum toxin injection into epicardial fat pads in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Three-year follow-up of a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin (BTX) injections into epicardial fat pads in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has resulted in suppression of atrial fibrillation (AF) during the early postoperative period through 1-year of follow-up in a pilot program. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to report 3-year AF patterns by the use of implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs). METHODS: Sixty patients with a history of paroxysmal AF and indications for CABG were randomized 1:1 to either BTX or placebo injections into 4 posterior epicardial fat pads. All patients received an ICM with regular follow-up for 3 years after surgery. The primary end point of the extended follow-up period was incidence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia after 30 days of procedure until 36 months on no antiarrhythmic drugs. The secondary end points included clinical events and AF burden. RESULTS: At the end of 36 months, the incidence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia was 23.3% in the BTX group vs 50% in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.36; 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.88; P = .02). AF burden at 12, 24, and 36 months was significantly lower in the BTX group than in the placebo group: 0.22% vs 1.88% (P = .003), 1.6% vs 9.5% (P < .001), and 1.3% vs 6.9% (P = .007), respectively. In the BTX group, 2 patients (7%) were hospitalized during follow-up compared with 10 (33%) in the placebo group (P = .02). CONCLUSION: Injection of BTX into epicardial fat pads in patients undergoing CABG resulted in a sustained and substantial reduction in atrial tachyarrhythmia incidence and burden during 3-year follow-up, accompanied by reduction in hospitalizations.

Prophylactic pulmonary vein isolation during isthmus ablation for atrial flutter: Three-year outcomes of the PREVENT AF I study.

INTRODUCTION: The PREVENT AF I study demonstrated that prophylactic pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with pure typical atrial flutter (AFL) resulted in substantial reduction of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) during 1-year follow-up as assessed by continuous implantable cardiac monitor (ICM). The objective of this study was to assess 3-year outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty patients with documented AFL were randomized to either cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation alone (n = 25) or CTI with concomitant PVI (n = 25). The primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia with the monthly burden exceeding 0.5% on the ICM. At the end of 3 years, freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia was 48% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 32-72%) in the CTI plus PVI group as compared to 20% (95% CI: 9-44%) in the CTI-only group (P = 0.01). Freedom from redo procedures was also higher: 92% (95% CI: 82-100%) versus 68% (95% CI: 52-89%), respectively (P = 0.027). The 3-year AF burden favored the combined ablation group: 6.2% versus 16.8% (P = 0.03). In the CTI-only group, 12 (48%) patients were hospitalized compared to 4 (16%) in the PVI + CTI group (P = 0.03). Two patients in the CTI-only group developed stroke with no serious adverse events in the PVI + CTI group. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic PVI in patients with only typical AFL resulted in a significant reduction of new-onset AF and burden during long-term follow-up as assessed by ICM, with consequent reduction in hospitalizations and need to perform repeat ablation for AF.

Effect of left atrial appendage excision on procedure outcome in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing surgical ablation.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is less successful for treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) than for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Some studies suggest that left atrial appendage (LAA) isolation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is required to maximize the benefits for PersAF after ablation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 surgical ablation approaches for PersAF via video-assisted thoracoscopy: PVI + box lesion and PVI + box lesion + LAA excision. METHODS: We randomly assigned 176 patients with PersAF to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical ablation with PVI + box lesion (88 patients) or PVI + box lesion + LAA excision (88 patients). The primary endpoint was freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia lasting >30 seconds after a single ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic drug (AAD). RESULTS: After 18 months of follow-up, 61 of 86 patients (70.9%) assigned to PVI + box lesion were free from recurrent atrial fibrillation compared to 64 of 87 patients (73.6%) assigned to PVI + box lesion + LAA excision after a single ablation procedure without AAD (P = .73). Freedom from any atrial arrhythmia after a single procedure with or without AAD was also nonsignificant (70.9% vs 74.7%, respectively). There were no significant differences between groups with regard to adverse events, including death, transient ischemic attack, stroke, pneumothorax, and hydrothorax. CONCLUSION: Among patients with PersAF, no reduction in the rate of recurrent atrial fibrillation was found when LAA excision was performed in addition to PVI and box lesion during surgical ablation.

Catheter versus surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation after a failed initial pulmonary vein isolation procedure: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation (CA) versus surgical ablation (SA) in the treatment of paroxysmal and persistent AF after failed initial pulmonary vein isolation procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with a history of symptomatic AF after a previous failed first ablation procedure were eligible for this study. Patients were randomized to CA (n = 32) or SA (n = 32) redo ablation. The primary endpoint was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia at 1 year of follow-up. At the 12-month follow-up, 26 (81%) of the 32 SA group patients and 15 (47%) of the 32 CA group were AF/AT-free on no antiarrhythmic drugs (P = 0.004, log-rank test). In patients with PAF, 17 (85%) patients of the 20 in SA group and 10 (56%) patients of the 18 in CA group were AF-free (P = 0.04, log-rank test). In patients with PersAF, 9 (75%) patients of the 12 in SA group and 5 (36%) patients of the 14 in CA group were AF-free (P = 0.04, log-rank test). The number of the serious adverse event in the SA group was significantly higher (1 CA group vs 7 SA group; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In patients with PAF and PersAF after failed initial CA, SA is superior to CA for maintenance of sinus rhythm, although serious adverse event rate is significantly higher for SA.