Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 47(5): 1553-1559, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32065243

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the accuracy of IV contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) tractography in the detection of peritoneal violation in anterior abdominal stab wounds (AASW) and its impact on the management algorithm. METHODS: This prospective study included 61 patients who presented to Kasr Alainy Hospital with AASW. According to the IV contrast-enhanced CT tractography, they were classified into penetrating, equivocal and non-penetrating injuries. The former two were subjected to diagnostic laparoscopy (DL), while the non-penetrating group was subjected to serial abdominal examination (SAE). The accuracy of CT tractography to detect peritoneal violation was assessed by correlating its findings with management outcome. RESULTS: CT tractography stratified the injuries into non penetrating (54.1%), equivocal (14.8%) and penetrating (31.1%). All non-penetrating stabs were managed successfully by SAE. DL proved negative for peritoneal violation in all equivocal injuries and positive in all injuries designated as penetrating. Consequently, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of CT tractography in detecting peritoneal violation was 100%. No missed injuries were encountered in this study. CONCLUSION: IV contrast-enhanced CT tractography is an effective tool in the evaluation of patients with AASW. Patients with negative tractography can be safely managed by SAE. Positive tractography accurately indicates peritoneal violation which warrants further management. Patients with equivocal findings were all negative for peritoneal violation by laparoscopy, therefore, they might be reallocated for frequent SAE to reduce the rate of non-therapeutic interventions.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries , Wounds, Penetrating , Wounds, Stab , Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Algorithms , Humans , Laparotomy , Prospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Wounds, Stab/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Stab/surgery
2.
J Pediatr Surg ; 52(4): 657-662, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28063680

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Esophageal replacement in children is indicated in cases of esophageal atresia with or without fistula, in case of long gap esophageal atresia or failed primary repair. Intractable post corrosive esophageal stricture is considered also a major indication for replacement. METHODS: This is a cohort retrospective study of esophageal replacement cases by gastric tube carried out at the pediatric surgery department at Cairo University between 2011 and 2015. We reported 50 patients (30 boys and 20 girls); the ages ranged from 7months to 9years. Esophageal atresia cases were 27 while caustic esophageal stricture cases were 23. Isoperistaltic gastric tube technique was done in 45 patients while antiperistaltic (reversed) gastric tube technique was done in 5 cases. Retrosternal route was chosen in 38 patients while transhiatal route was chosen in 12 patients. RESULTS: Leakage and stricture were the most common complications. We had 5 cases of mortality, which were caused mainly by chest related complications. We had excellent to good results during long term follow up in terms of weight gain, swallowing pattern, quality of life, and overall satisfaction CONCLUSION: Gastric tube is a satisfactory surgical method for esophageal replacement in children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Atresia/surgery , Esophageal Stenosis/surgery , Esophagoplasty/methods , Child , Child, Preschool , Esophagoplasty/instrumentation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Male , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...