Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Emerg Med J ; 23(5): 388-90, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16627843

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine which of three commonly used methods for notifying medical staff of the arrival of an emergent case to the triage area of an emergency department (ED) is optimal. METHODS: Prospective, randomised trial. Patients arriving with conditions rated as emergencies (triage category 2) were randomised to one of three notification arms: by microphone, by telephone, or by computer. The proportion of patients seen by a doctor within 10 minutes of arrival to the ED in each arm was compared. RESULTS: A total of 1000 patients were enrolled. The proportion seen within 10 minutes for patients announced by microphone was significantly greater than those announced by telephone or computer (67.0% v 63.2% v 57.3%, respectively; chi2 6.30, p = 0.04). No method achieved the benchmark proportion of 80% of patients seen within 10 minutes of arrival. CONCLUSIONS: A microphone announcement heard by overhead speakers should be incorporated with other strategies to improve the timeliness of medical assessment of emergent cases.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Service Communication Systems/standards , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , New South Wales , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Triage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...