Effectiveness of chitosan phonophoresis on ulnar nerve conduction velocity, pain relief, and functional outcomes for mild to moderate cubital tunnel syndrome: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Cubital tunnel syndrome (CBTS) impairs hand function, with limited conservative options often leading to surgery. Chitosan neuroregenerative effects delivered via phonophoresis provide a rationale for testing this emerging treatment approach. PURPOSE: The primary goal of this research was to assess the impact of chitosan phonophoresis on the conductivity of the ulnar nerve, as well as its effects on pain levels and functional outcomes in individuals diagnosed with mild to moderate CBTS. STUDY DESIGN: Double-blind randomized controlled trial. METHODS: This was a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled study. The participants consisted of 54 individuals aged between 20-35 years who were randomly assigned using block randomization. The control group (n = 27) received standard hand therapy alone, while the experimental group (n = 27) received both standard hand therapy and chitosan phonophoresis. Both groups underwent three treatment sessions per week, each lasting for 60-72 minutes, over a period of five weeks. Pre- and post-intervention evaluations included assessments of ulnar nerve conduction velocity (NCV), pain assessment using the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), as well as hand function evaluated using the Quick Disabilities of Arm Shoulder Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire. RESULTS: After the intervention, the experimental group significantly improved in all outcome measures compared to the control group. Accordingly, ulnar NCV (MD = 2.233 m/sec; CI = 1.63:2.83; p < 0.001; η2p = 0.516), NPRS (MD = -1.11; CI = -1.71: -0.50; p < 0.001; η2p = 0.208) and QuickDASH (MD = -2.72; CI = -4.54:0.87; p < 0.007; η2p = 0.133). CONCLUSIONS: The study findings suggest that chitosan phonophoresis may have the potential as a supplementary treatment to hand therapy for individuals with mild to moderate CBTS. This approach demonstrated significant improvements in nerve conduction, pain reduction, and enhancement of hand function.

Effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in treatment of upper and lower limb tendinopathies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tendinopathy is caused by repetitive motion, excessive stress on the tendon, overstretch, and motion past the critical angle of rotation or translation. There are various treatment options available for tendinitis, including those affecting both the upper and lower limbs and those of calcific and non-calcific types. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: Few reviews have analyzed the efficacy of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) in treating upper and lower limb tendinopathies while considering calcific and non-calcific-type tendinitis. This paper provides a review and meta-analysis on Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), which compared results from a group undergoing ESWT treatment to another group under different treatments. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials (CENTRAL), and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) databases for articles published up to January 2022. The reference lists of identified articles were further scanned. Twenty-two studies were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Meta-analysis showed no difference in pain reduction in ESWT when compared with a comparison group at 4 (p = 0.26) and 12 weeks (p = 0.33). There were no differences in DASH scores at 12 months between the two groups (p = 0.32). CONCLUSION: Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) is effective when used to treat lower limb and calcific tendinitis. It does not yield any better results than other treatment options in managing upper limb tendinopathies and non-calcific tendinopathies.

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy vs. Corticosteroid Local Injection in Shoulder Impingement Syndrome : A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of combining extracorporeal shock wave therapy or local corticosteroid injections with a conventional physical therapy (CPT) program for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. DESIGN: This was a prospective single-blinded, randomized controlled study. METHODS: Sixty patients with unilateral shoulder impingement syndrome >3 mos were allocated to group A (a 4-wk program of CPT plus a single local corticosteroid injection of 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide mixed with 1% xylocaine, n = 20), group B (CPT only, n = 20), and group C (CPT plus extracorporeal shock wave therapy, 2000 impulses, 0.2-0.3 mJ/mm 2 , one session per week for 3 wks, n = 20). Subacromial space, shoulder pain and disability index, and shoulder range of motion were assessed at baseline and 4 and 12 wks posttreatment. RESULTS: There were no between-group differences at 4 wks. At the 12-wk follow-up, no significant differences were found between groups A and B. There was a significant difference in favor of group C compared with group A with the expectation of shoulder internal rotation and subacromial space. Group C was also superior to group B in all outcomes except for subacromial space. CONCLUSION: The addition of extracorporeal shock wave therapy to CPT induced more noticeable intermediate-term effects than CPT plus local corticosteroid injection or CPT alone.