Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21263310

ABSTRACT

This article introduces data collected in the Citizens Attitudes Under Covid-19 Project (CAUCP), which surveyed public opinion throughout the Covid-19 pandemic in 11 countries between March to December 2020. In this paper, we present a unique cross-country panel survey of citizens attitudes and behaviors during a worldwide unprecedented health, governance, and economic crisis. This dataset allows to examine the behavioral and attitudinal consequences of crisis across time and contexts. In this paper, we describe the set-up of the CAUCP and the main features of the dataset and we present promising research prospects.

2.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 27(3): 240-52, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21472779

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Psychoses with onset in late adulthood are challenging. Identifying those older patients at risk would be clinically important and would have research implications. METHODS: A computer search was performed to identify all cohort studies of risk factor(s) for psychotic symptoms or disorders with onset at 40 years or older. Experts were contacted and bibliographies were screened for additional references. Validity of located studies was assessed according to evidence-based medicine criteria for risk factors studies. Data were extracted and tabulated for qualitative and quantitative analyses. RESULTS: Twelve articles were retrieved, corresponding to 11 studies of 32 potential risk factors. In the qualitative analysis, only the history of psychotic symptoms, cognitive problems, poor health status, visual impairment, and negative life events appeared to be significant risk factors of late-onset psychosis. Older age, female gender, and hearing impairment were not associated with psychosis in older patients. Quantitative analysis was feasible with only one item, female gender, and confirmed the lack of associated risk with late-onset psychosis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the methodological limitations of the studies included in this review, there is some evidence from cohort studies that history of psychotic symptoms, cognitive problems, poor physical health, visual impairment, and negative life events are risk factors for late-onset psychosis. More long-term follow-up studies are needed to confirm these findings.


Subject(s)
Psychotic Disorders/etiology , Adult , Age of Onset , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Qualitative Research , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors
3.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 22(5): 411-7, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17096457

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The study aimed: (1) to describe the 12-month course of depressive symptoms among medical inpatients aged 65+, and (2) to investigate predictors of a more severe course that could be identified easily by non-psychiatric staff. METHODS: Patients were recruited at two Montreal hospitals. Inclusion criteria were: aged 65+, admitted to medical service, at most mild cognitive impairment. Patients were screened for major and minor depression (DSM-IV criteria). All depressed patients and a random sample of non-depressed patients were invited to participate in the prospective study. The Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) was administered at admission, 3, 6, and 12 months. Individual patient trajectories of depressive symptoms over time were grouped using hierarchical clustering into three patient groups with a minimal, mild, and moderate/severe course of symptoms, respectively. The baseline predictors of a more severe clinical course were identified using ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-two patients completed baseline and one or more follow-up interviews. Baseline patient characteristics that independently predicted a more severe symptom course included higher initial HAMD score, depressive core symptoms lasting 6 months or more, and female sex. CONCLUSION: The 12-month course of depression symptoms in this medically ill older sample was generally stable. Patients who will experience a more severe course can be identified by non-psychiatric staff at admission to hospital.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/psychology , Depression/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Patient Admission , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Interview, Psychological , Male , Mass Screening , Mental Status Schedule , Personality Inventory , Prospective Studies , Quebec
4.
CMAJ ; 174(1): 38-44, 2006 Jan 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16330624

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Major depression is a frequent and serious disorder in older medical inpatients. Because the condition goes undetected and untreated in most of these patients, we conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a strategy of systematic detection and multidisciplinary treatment of depression in this population. METHODS: Consecutive patients aged 65 years or more admitted to general medical services in a primary care hospital between October 1999 and November 2002 were screened for depression with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) within 48 hours after admission. Patients found to have major depression were randomly allocated to receive the intervention or usual care. The intervention involved consultation and treatment by a psychiatrist and follow-up by a research nurse and the patient's family physician. Research assistants, blind to group allocation, collected data from the patients at enrollment and at 3 and 6 months later using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), the Medical Outcomes 36-item Short Form (SF-36), the DIS, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Older Americans Resources and Services (OARS) questionnaire to assess basic and instrumental activities of daily living (OARS-ADL and OARS-IADL) and the Rating Scale for Side Effects. Data on the severity of illness, length of hospital stay, health services and medication use, mortality and process of care were also collected. The primary outcome measures were the HAMD and SF-36. RESULTS: Of 1500 eligible patients who were screened, 157 were found to have major depression and consented to participate (78 in the intervention group and 79 in the usual care group). At randomization, there were no clinically or statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. Sixty-four patients completed follow-up to 6 months, 57 withdrew, and 36 died. At 6 months, there were no clinically or statistically significant differences the 2 groups in HAMD or SF-36 scores or any of the secondary outcome measures. INTERPRETATION: We were unable to demonstrate that systematic detection and multidisciplinary care of depression was more beneficial than usual care for elderly medical inpatients.


Subject(s)
Aging/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Patient Care Team , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Patient Admission , Primary Health Care , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 53(8): 1344-53, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16078960

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of and characteristics associated with major and minor depression in older medical inpatients and to compare associated characteristics by sex and history of depression. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of two patient samples, with and without a screening diagnosis of major or minor depression. SETTING: The medical services of two acute care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Medical admissions of people aged 65 and older with at most mild cognitive impairment (N=380). MEASUREMENTS: Diagnoses of major and minor depression (Diagnostic Interview Schedule), cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination), premorbid disability, sociodemographic variables (including social networks and support), comorbidity, severity of illness, history of depression. RESULTS: The prevalence of major depression differed by hospital, ranging from 14.2% (95% confidence interval (CI)=11.7-17.1) in Hospital A to 44.5% (95% CI=33.1-56.4) in Hospital B. The prevalence of minor depression was similar in the two hospitals, ranging from 9.4% (95% CI=7.4-11.9) in Hospital A to 7.9% (95% CI=2.9-16.3) in Hospital B. After adjustment for hospital, the same characteristics (history of depression, premorbid disability, cognitive impairment, perceived adequacy of support, and visits from friends) were associated with major and minor depression, although most of these associations tended to be weaker for minor depression. Most of these factors were also associated with depression in multivariate analyses. The most important characteristics in women were premorbid disability, history of depression, and adequacy of emotional support; in men they were history of depression, cognitive impairment, and adequacy of emotional support. A cerebrovascular or other cardiovascular diagnosis did not explain the association between depression and cognitive impairment. CONCLUSION: Major and minor depression occur frequently in older medical inpatients and are associated with similar patient characteristics. A history of depression and the patient's sex should be considered in the identification and interpretation of these associated factors.


Subject(s)
Depression/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Inpatients , Aged , Cognition Disorders/complications , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/etiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/etiology , Emotions , Female , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Sex Factors , Social Support
6.
BMC Fam Pract ; 6(1): 15, 2005 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15840163

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Family practitioners take care of large numbers of seniors with increasingly complex mental health problems. Varying levels of input may be necessary from psychiatric consultants. This study examines patients'/family, family practitioners', and psychiatrists' perceptions of the bi-directional pathway between such primary care doctors and consultants. METHODS: An 18 month survey was conducted in an out-patient psychogeriatric clinic of a Montreal university-affiliated community hospital. Cognitively intact seniors referred by family practitioners for assessment completed a satisfaction and expectation survey following their visits with the psychiatric consultants. The latter completed a self-administered process of care questionnaire at the end of the visit, while family doctors responded to a similar survey by telephone after the consultants' reports had been received. Responses of the 3 groups were compared. RESULTS: 101 seniors, referred from 63 family practitioners, met the study entry criteria for assessment by 1 of 3 psychogeriatricians. Both psychiatrists and family doctors agreed that help with management was the most common reason for referral. Family physicians were accepting of care of elderly with mental health problems, but preferred that the psychiatrists assume the initial treatment; the consultants preferred direct return of the patient; and almost 1/2 of patients did not know what to expect from the consultation visit. The rates of discordance in expectations were high when each unique patient-family doctor-psychiatrist triad was examined. CONCLUSION: Gaps in expectations exist amongst family doctors, psychiatrists, and patients/family in the shared mental health care of seniors. Goals and anticipated outcomes of psychogeriatric consultation require better definition.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Geriatric Psychiatry/standards , Mentally Ill Persons/psychology , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation , Aged , Geriatric Psychiatry/organization & administration , Hospitals, Community/organization & administration , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/standards , Physician-Patient Relations , Physicians, Family/psychology , Process Assessment, Health Care , Quebec , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Can Fam Physician ; 50: 1671-7, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15648383

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of elderly people without dementia who would want disclosure of a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), for themselves or for their spouses, and to verify whether the availability of medication would influence their decision. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey with a semistructured questionnaire completed during face-to-face interviews. SETTING: Medical and surgical outpatient clinics in St Mary's Hospital Center. PARTICIPANTS: 204 subjects 65 years or older with at most mild cognitive impairment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of positive responses for disclosure of a diagnosis of AD to self or to spouse, with or without medication. RESULTS: Nearly all (98%) subjects wanted disclosure for themselves. Most (78%) wanted disclosure for their potentially afflicted spouses when medication was said to be unavailable. This proportion increased to 97%, however, if medication was available. CONCLUSION: Most participants requested honesty for themselves. Most wanted disclosure to a potentially affected spouse when medication is said to be available.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Attitude to Health , Truth Disclosure , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Marital Status , Spouses , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...