ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Locked plating is one of the latest innovative options for treating supracondylar femur fractures with relatively low failure rates. Single lateral plating was often found to have a relative higher failure rate. No clinical studies of double-plating distal femur fixation have thus far been reported. The aim of this study is to present our clinical experience with this surgical approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients (26 females and 6 males, mean age 76 years, range 44-101) were included in the study. Eight of them patients had a periprosthetic stable implant fracture and two patients were treated for a nonunion. RESULTS: All fractures, excluding one that needed bone grafting and one refracture, healed within 12 weeks. One patient needed bone grafting for delayed union and one patient needed fixation exchange due to femur re-fracture at the site of the most proximal screw. Two patients developed superficial wound infection and one patient required medial plate removal after union due to deep infection. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these promising results, we propose that the double-plating technique should be considered in the surgeon's armamentarium for the treatment of supracondylar femur fractures, particularly in patients with poor bone quality, comminuted fractures and very low periprosthetic fractures.
Subject(s)
Bone Plates , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fractures, Comminuted/surgery , Periprosthetic Fractures/surgery , Radiography , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Femoral Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Fractures/physiopathology , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Fracture Healing/physiology , Fractures, Comminuted/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Comminuted/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Periprosthetic Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Periprosthetic Fractures/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The treatment of a simple (AO/OTA classification 31A3.1) reverse oblique intertrochanteric hip fracture is a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. The surgical options include the use of side plates with various angled leg screws or intramedullary devices. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess our results of treating reverse oblique fracture with an expendable proximal femoral nail (EPFN) or with a dynamic condylar screw-plate (DCS: 95°) between January 2006 and July 2009. Thirty-three patients (6 males and 27 females, mean age 78 years) met the study inclusion criteria and comprised the two study groups: 19 had been treated by EPFNs and 14 had received DCSs. They were followed for a mean of 28 months (range 6-47). Eight patients (5 EPFN and 3 DCS) died during the follow-up period from causes not related to the operation. Two ESPN patients and 5 DCS patients had malunions. Functional outcome scores showed better results in the EPFN group, but the difference was statistically significant only for the sitting subcategory (p=0.04). Based on our results and experience, we propose that the EPFN is at least as good as the DCS for treating reverse oblique fractures of the femur.
