Efficacy and cost savings with the use of a minimal sedation / anxiolysis protocol for intra-articular corticosteroid injections in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

BACKGROUND: Intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACI) are frequently used in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. There is a paucity of evidence-based research describing methods of pain and anxiety control for this procedure. IACI were mostly performed under general anesthesia for children younger than 13 years old in our institution as of 2014. We started to integrate sedation services more commonly in our institution with the minimal sedation/anxiolysis (MSA) protocol outlined as an alternative to general anesthesia for IACI in 2015. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and cost savings of a minimal sedation protocol for intra-articular corticosteroid injections in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients after instituting this protocol at our institution. METHODS: The MSA protocol included nitrous oxide, intranasal fentanyl, a topical numbing agent, acetaminophen, ibuprofen, ondansetron and child life intervention. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on a total of 80 consecutive patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis who underwent joint injections using the protocol. RESULTS: The procedure was successfully completed in greater than 95% of the patients. The median pain score (measured on a verbal numeric scale of 0-10) reported by the patient was 1 (IQR 0-2.5), by the parent 1 (IQR 0-2), by the rheumatologist 1 (IQR 0-1), and by the sedationist 1 (IQR 0-1). Degree of motion during the procedure was reported by the rheumatologist and the sedationist as none in 68% of the patients, mild in 36% and moderate in 6%. Patient, parent, rheumatologist and sedationist rated satisfaction as very high in the vast majority (94%). Emesis was reported in only 2 (2.5%) patients, no significant adverse events were reported, and no patients progressed to a deeper level of sedation than intended. Financial analysis revealed a 33% cost reduction compared with the use of general anesthesia in the operating room. CONCLUSIONS: A minimal sedation/anxiolysis protocol (including nitrous oxide, intranasal fentanyl, a topical numbing agent, acetaminophen, ibuprofen, ondansetron and child life intervention), provides safe and effective analgesia for intra-articular corticosteroid injection in a subset of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and offers a lower cost alternative to general anesthesia.

Polyethylene glycol 3350 based colon cleaning protocol: 2 d vs 4 d head to head comparison.

AIM: To compare between 2 and 4 d colon cleansing protocols. METHODS: Children who were scheduled for colonoscopy procedure (2010-2012) for various medical reasons, were recruited from the pediatric gastroenterology clinic at Marshall University School of Medicine, Huntington, WV. Exclusion criteria were patients who were allergic to the medication used in the protocols [polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350, Bisacodyl], or children with metabolic or renal diseases. Two PEG 3350 protocols for 4 d (A) and 2 d (B) were prescribed as previously described. A questionnaire describing the volume of PEG consumed, clinical data, and side effects were recorded. Colon preparation was graded by two observers according to previously described method. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Rate of adequate colon preparation. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were considered for final calculation (group A: 40, group B: 38). Age and stool consistency at the last day was comparable in both groups, but the number of stools/day was significantly higher in group B (P = 0.001). Adequate colon preparation was reached in 57.5% (A) and 73.6% (B), respectively (P = 0.206). Side effects were minimal and comparable in both groups. There was no difference in children's age, stool characteristics, or side effects between the children with adequate or inadequate colon preparation. Correlation and agreement between observers was excellent (Pearson correlation = 0.972, kappa = 1.0). CONCLUSION: No difference between protocols was observed, but the 2 d protocol was superior for its shorter time. Direct comparison between different colon cleansing protocols is crucial in order to establish the "gold standard" protocol for children.

Obesity is not a risk factor in children with reflux esophagitis: a retrospective analysis of 738 children.

Obesity has been associated with various gastrointestinal diseases in children, but the role of obesity in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has not been clearly established. The aim of the study was to investigate whether obesity and/or being overweight are risk factors for reflux esophagitis in children. A retrospective analysis of endoscopy charts was reviewed. Demographic, weight, height, and histology results were obtained from each patient. The body mass index (BMI) and BMI Z-score were calculated according to known formula. The diagnosis of GERD was established by histology. The charts of 738 children were reviewed; of these, 345 (47%) children were overweight or obese. Histological findings compatible with GERD were found in 254 (65%) children with normal weight, 111 (69%) overweight children, and 126 (68%) obese children (P > 0.05). Among those reviewed, the mean age of children with normal weight was significantly younger than that of overweight or obese children (P = 0.0001). A single variant analysis showed a significant association between GERD and male gender (P = 0.0001). Multivariant analysis (gender, age, and BMI Z-score) showed that GERD was significantly associated with male gender (P < 0.0001), but not with age (P = 0.443) or BMI Z-score (P = 0.098). In symptomatic children with histologically proven GERD, only male gender was an independent risk factor for GERD, not obesity or being overweight. Large, prospective studies in children that capture a larger spectrum of GERD are clearly warranted.