Prognostic factors and therapeutic options for treatment of frozen shoulder: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the current status of scientific research on the natural history of frozen shoulder as published in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was carried out on PubMed data and was guided by PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Articles had to meet inclusion criteria. The quality of the papers was assessed using a newly developed tool, AMQPP (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Published Papers). The AMQPP score was correlated with the level of evidence rating according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Suitable papers were divided into groups according to the shoulder condition on which they reported. This article focuses on the frozen shoulder. RESULTS: Seven articles on frozen shoulder met the inclusion criteria. One article was considered to have level 1 of evidence. Three articles had level 3 and the remaining 3 had level 4. Three papers assessed the natural history and the natural course of different forms of stiff shoulder. The others indirectly assessed the natural history by evaluating therapy trends. None of the articles clearly referred to the role of regression to the mean of frozen shoulder specifically. CONCLUSION: Spontaneous recovery to normal levels of function is possible and standardised non-operative treatment programmes are an effective alternative to surgery in most cases. However, patients with high risk factors such as diabetes mellitus, and those who suffer chronic symptoms or bilaterally affected, would benefit from early surgery. We also concluded that AMQPP score is simple and straight forward. It works as a quick quality-checking tool which helps researchers to identify the key points in each paper and reach a decision regarding the eligibility of the paper more easily. The AMQPP score is still open for further development.

The natural history of rotator cuff tears: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To analyse the current scientific evidence regarding the natural history of the clinical and anatomical progression of rotator cuff tears. METHODS: A broad systematic review of the literature (PubMed database through January 2014) which was guided, conducted and reported according to PRISMA criteria. This article focuses on the rotator cuff tears. Articles had to meet an inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of each study was individually assessed using a recently developed general assessment tool AMQPP (assessing the methodological quality of published papers). RESULTS: Seven articles dealing with rotator cuff tears were included, one of them was a high-quality study. Three papers assessed the natural history and the natural course of rotator cuff rupture directly. The other studies indirectly assessed the natural history with reports on non-operative and operative therapy trends. All of these articles had been published in four different top medical journals according to 2013 ranking. We found no articles which clearly referred to the role of regression to the mean of rotator cuff tears. CONCLUSION: The development of symptoms and anatomical deterioration are often directly correlated. Spontaneous recovery to normal levels of function has been successfully achieved, and standardised non-operative treatment programmes are an effective alternative to surgery for many patients. Follow-up is necessary to avoid irreparable stage. However, surgery is still favoured by young active people and highly professional persons who need to get fit in a short period of time. Further research is still necessary. The AMQPP score system is simple and reliable. It works as a quick quality-checking tool which helps researchers to identify the key points in each paper and reach a decision regarding the eligibility of the paper more easily.