The risk of recurrent IgA nephropathy in a steroid-free protocol and other modifying immunosuppression.

Recurrent glomerulonephritis is an important cause of kidney allograft failure. The effect of immunosuppression on recurrent IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is unclear. We analyzed the impact of steroids and other immunosuppression on the risk of recurrent IgAN post-kidney transplantation. Between June 1989 and November 2008, 3311 kidney transplants were performed at our center. IgAN was the primary disease in 124 patients; of these, 75 (60.5%) patients received steroid-based immunosuppression (15 undergoing late steroid withdrawal), and 49 (39.5%) were maintained on steroid-free immunosuppression. Recurrent IgAN was diagnosed in 27 of 124 (22%) patients in clinically indicated kidney allograft biopsies over a median follow-up of 6.86 ± 5.4 yr. On cox proportional hazards model multivariate analysis, the hazard risk (HR) of IgAN recurrence was significantly higher in patients managed with steroid-free (HR 8.59: 3.03, 24.38, p < 0.001) and sirolimus-based (HR = 3.00:1.16, 7.75, p = 0.024) immunosuppression without antilymphocyte globulin induction (HR = 4.5: 1.77, 11.73, p = 0.002). Mycophenolate use was associated with a lower risk (HR = 0.42: 0.19, 0.95, p = 0.036), whereas cyclosporine did not have a significant impact on the risk of IgAN recurrence (p = 0.61). These results warrant future prospective studies regarding the role of steroids and other immunosuppression drugs in reducing recurrence of IgAN and other glomerulonephritis post-transplant.

PubMed Medical Publications From Libya

Medical research and publications are the back-bone for advancing the medical field. We identified the PubMed medical publications that are affiliated with Libya to shed some light on the contribution of this country's medical community to the PubMed database. All publications affiliated with Libya in the PubMed were counted over a five year period ending December 2006. We also used the same method to obtain data on the PubMed medical publications from Tunisia; Morocco and Yemen. Tunisia had the largest number of PubMed publications among the studied countries: 20.4 publications per million population per year and 7.2 publications per year per one billion US$ GDP. Libya had much fewer publications: 2.4 publications per million population per year and 0.4 publications per one billion US$ GDP. The citation frequency for Libyan published research was very low compared to Tunisian and Moroccan related research. Conclusion: This preliminary analysis shows that medical research output in Libya is about twenty times less than in other countries with similar backgrounds; and that it needs to be enhanced

A randomized prospective trial of OKT3 induction in the current immunosuppression era.

Recent improvements in immunosuppression and subsequent decreases in the incidence of acute rejection have brought into question the benefit of the use peri-transplant antibody therapy (i.e. induction therapy). In the current era of immunosuppression that includes mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclosporine emulsion (Neoral, Novartis, Basle, Switzerland), we designed and have completed a prospective, randomized trial to address this question. Cadaveric and living donor renal allograft recipients were randomized to receive either OKT3/MMF/delayed Neoral/prednisone or MMF/immediate Neoral/prednisone without OKT3. The incidence of rejection episodes was the primary end point. Patients with delayed graft function were excluded. All rejection episodes were biopsy proven and all patients have been followed for a minimum of 2 yr. Fifty-four patients received OKT3 induction, of which 6 patients suffered a rejection episode (11%), while 13 patients (27%) not receiving OKT3 (p=0.04) had a rejection episode. Four patients in the no OKT3 group suffered multiple rejections, while there were only 2 with more than one episode in the OKT3 group. There was no increased incidence of infectious complications in the group receiving OKT3. Hospital costs tended to be higher in the OKT3-treated group, but were not significantly different. The low incidence of rejection in the OKT3-treated group was intriguing and validates the use of antibody therapy in the early post-operative periods even in the era of improved baseline immunosuppression.

Pulmonary Rhizopus infection in a diabetic renal transplant recipient.

Infectious complications after renal transplantation remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Mucormycosis is a rare infection in renal transplant recipients; however, mortality is exceedingly high. Risk factors predisposing to this disease include prolonged neutropenia, diabetes, and patients who are immunosuppressed (Singh N, Gayowski T, Singh J, Yu LV. Invasive gastrointestinal zygomycosis in a liver transplant recipient: case report and review of zygomycosis in solid-organ transplant recipients, Clin Infect Dis 1995: 20: 617). Life-threatening infections can occur, as this fungus has the propensity to invade blood vessel endothelium, resulting in hematological dissemination. We report a case of cavitary Rhizopus lung infection, 2 months after renal transplantation, where the patient was treated successfully with Amphotericin B and surgical resection of the lesions with preservation of his allograft function. In this era of intensified immunosuppression, we may see an increased incidence of mucormycosis in transplant population. Invasive diagnostic work-up is mandatory in case of suspicion; Amphotericin B and, in selected cases, surgical resection are the mainstays of therapy.

Obese living kidney donors: short-term results and possible implications.

BACKGROUND: Living kidney donation has increased recently as the shortage of cadaveric organs continues. This increase has occurred in part, due to expanded donor criteria, including obese patients. This is a potential concern because obesity is associated with surgical complications, possibly death, and chronic medical problems. To address this concern, we examined the outcome of a large group of obese (ObD) and nonobese living kidney donors (NObD). METHODS: A total of 107 obese (body mass index> or =27 kg/m2) and 116 nonobese (body mass index<27 kg/m2) living kidney donors donating at a single institution between 1990 and 1996 were studied. Surgical complications, operative duration, and hospital length of stay were assessed. Preoperative blood pressure, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, protein excretion, fasting glucose, and hemoglobin A1C were measured and first degree relatives with diabetes were identified. RESULTS: Overall complications were significantly more common in ObD, 16.8 vs. 3.4% (P=0.0012). The majority of complications in the entire cohort, 56%, were wound related and were significantly more common in ObD (P=0.016). There was no significant increase in nonwound-related infections, bleeding, or cardiopulmonary events. There were no deaths or major complications. Operative time was significantly longer in ObD 151+/-30 vs. 141+/-29 min (P<0.05) but hospital duration was no different. Predonation, blood pressure in ObD was significantly higher, (P<0.05) and they more often had a family history of diabetes, 46 vs. 30% (P<0.05) than nonobese donors. Renal function, proteinuria, fasting glucose, or hemoglobin A1C were no different. CONCLUSION: With prudent selection, the use of obese living kidney donors appears safe in the short term. They experience more minor complications, usually wound related, and slightly longer operations. Given a higher baseline blood pressure and family history of diabetes, the long-term effect on the remaining solitary kidney in ObD needs to be examined.

Pathologic classification of chronic allograft nephropathy: pathogenic and prognostic implications.

BACKGROUND: After transplantation renal allografts frequently develop interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, and these pathologic changes are the hallmarks of chronic allograft nephropathy (CN). However, the diagnosis of CN has no specific pathogenic implications. In this study we sought to determined whether a subclassification of CN according to vascular pathology correlates with posttransplant events, particularly acute rejection, and graft survival. METHODS: A total of 419 patients with moderate to severe CN were subdivided into: (1) transplant arteriopathy (TA, n=233, 56%); (2) arteriolar hyalinosis (AH, n=89, 21%); and (3) no characteristic vascular pathology (IFb, n=97, 23%). RESULTS: Patients with AH differed significantly from patients with TA or IFb in the following parameters: (1) AH was diagnosed later after transplantation (P=0.001); (2) fewer patients with AH had acute rejection (AR) before the diagnosis of CN (P<0.0001). For example, 44% of AH and 75% of TA had AR before CN; (3) patients with AH also had fewer AR episodes than the other two groups (P<0.0001); finally, (4) graft survival was better in patients with AH than in patients with TA (P=0.01 by chi2, P=0.001 by Cox). In contrast, there were no significant differences between patients with TA and IFb. By multivariate analysis the survival of grafts with CN correlated with: (1) serum creatinine at diagnosis (P<0.0001), (2) recipient's weight (P=0.004); (3) presence of FGS or level of proteinuria (P=0.03); and (4) the occurrence of AR after the diagnosis of CN (P<0.0001). Regarding the latter, AR were more common (P=0.007) and more numerous (P=0.005) in patients with TA or IFb than in AH. CONCLUSIONS: CN can be classified according to vascular pathology in the majority of cases, and this classification correlates with graft survival. Although some forms of CN are closely associated with the occurrence of AR others are not. This study also uncovered several variables that correlate with the survival of grafts with CN.

Increased incidence of gastrointestinal surgical complications in renal transplant recipients with polycystic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: We had the impression that, although our renal transplant recipients with polycystic kidney disease (PKD) had excellent long-term renal graft function, they had an increased incidence of postoperative gastrointestinal (GI) complications. METHODS: Over a 10-year period (1987 through 1996), 1467 renal transplants were performed in 1417 patients; 145 of these transplants involved PKD recipients. In the PKD group, 18 patients (12.4%) developed a posttransplant complication necessitating GI surgery (PKD-GI), an incidence twice that in the non-PKD recipients (73 patients or 6.2%, non-PKD-GI). RESULTS: PKD and non-PKD recipients displayed no significant difference in mortality. The PKD patients had better long-term renal graft survival than the non-PKD patients (P=0.08). There was no difference in mortality (P>0.6) or renal graft survival (P>0.6) between the PKD-GI and PKD-non-GI groups. The PKD-GI group had no increased mortality over the non-PKD-GI patients (P>0.6), despite a higher incidence of GI surgical complications in the PKD group versus the non-PKD group (overall: 12.4 vs. 6.2%, P<0.01; within 90 days of transplant: 7.6 vs. 3.3%, P<0.02) and a greater propensity for small and large bowel complications (overall: 9.0 vs. 2.6%; P< 0.001; less than 90 days: 6.9 vs. 2.0%, P<0.002). The PKD-GI recipients tended toward less long-term graft loss than their non-PKD-GI counterparts (11.1 vs. 27.4%; P=.22). The PKD-GI recipients suffered no acute rejection episodes within 90 days after their GI operation versus 11 of 73 non-PKD-GI recipients (O vs. 15.1%; P=0.075). CONCLUSIONS: PKD recipients of renal grafts should be watched closely early after transplant because of their increased risk of GI complications. These complications resulted in no increase in mortality or graft loss compared to non-PKD recipients with GI complications despite the PKD group's higher incidence of bowel perforation and increased age at time of transplant.

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation at the Ohio State University Medical Center.

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation is becoming an accepted procedure for the treatment of Type I diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease. Its value in Type II diabetic patient remains to be evaluated. With the improvements in technical skills and immunosuppression medications, the procedure has become safer than those performed in the previous decade. However, the diabetic host is a high-risk individual. Careful evaluation and selection is prudent to keep excellent results with this scarce organ. As we have seen in this series, death is the number one cause of graft loss and better preoperative evaluation will continue to be of significant value to lower the mortality rate of SPK transplantation. We are moving to the use of marginal donors and marginal recipients very carefully and more data is needed to prove its safety and cost effectiveness. At our center, long-term patient and graft survival have been acceptable (86% and 73%, respectively, at 5 years). We will continue to use SPK transplantation as the procedure of choice for excellent candidates. We may need to change our philosophy to use living-related kidney transplants followed by a sequential pancreas transplant to overcome some of the shortage of pancreatic organs. The issue of primary enteric drainage has not been addressed in this report due to our success with bladder drainage. Despite the lower threshold for enteric conversion, about 10% of our patients are converted.

Acute rejection following renal transplantation. Evidence that severity is the best predictor of subsequent graft survival time.

UNLABELLED: Timely recognition of risk factors influencing graft survival time following kidney transplantation could facilitate the development of clinical interventions that would increase the longevity of graft survival. To identify these risk factors, we performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical outcome of 1949 renal transplants performed at The Ohio State University Transplant Program between 22 September 1982 and 14 June 1996. The number of acute rejection (AR) episodes was most predictive of shorter graft survival time. The first AR episode severity (indexed using the difference between post-treatment serum creatinine (RxCr) and baseline serum creatinine (BCr), or DeltaCr = RxCr - BCr) was the best predictor of graft survival time (r = 0.27, p < 0.0001) in patients experiencing AR. Subsequent AR episodes occurred more frequently in patients with a higher DeltaCr. However, DeltaCr was the best predictor of graft survival time (r = 0.44, p < 0.0001) in patients who had only one AR episode. The severity of the first AR episode (DeltaCr) correlated with the risk of subsequent AR episodes, the severity of a second AR episode and the average of mean blood pressures obtained after, but not before, the first AR episode. Therefore, we conclude that the severity of the first AR episode was the best predictor of renal allograft survival time in all patients experiencing AR, independent of subsequent AR episodes and correlated with subsequent clinical events which also influence renal allograft survival time. Thus, early diagnosis and aggressive treatment of the first AR episode are warranted to minimize AR severity and thereby maximize subsequent graft survival time. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of the first acute rejection episode following renal transplantation is the best determinant of graft survival time and correlates with subsequent clinical events which could further reduce graft survival time.

Clinical implications of the diagnosis of renal allograft infarction by percutaneous biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Herein we investigated the relationships between acute rejection (AR), infection, and renal allograft infarcts, particularly those infarcts that occur beyond the immediate posttransplant period and that affect functioning grafts. METHODS: Infarcts (n=59) were classified as: (1) early (EI; <2 months after transplant; n=32); or (2) late (LI; >2 months; n=27). Controls included patients with severe AR but without infarction (n=84). RESULTS: There were not significant differences in donor or recipient characteristics between infarcts and controls. At diagnosis, patients with infarcts were more likely to be infected (30%) than controls (14%, P=0.01); 15% of infarcts and 1% of controls had disseminated cytomegalovirus (P=0.04). Infarct and AR coexisted in the biopsy specimens of 66% of patients with EI and 62% of patients with LI, but the AR severity ranged from borderline to severe. Furthermore, 30% of patients with EI/LI had a history of severe AR. Graft survival was 47% in patients with EI, 22% in patients with LI (NS), and 71% in controls (P<0.0001, chi-square and Cox regression). Correlates of better graft survival in infarcts included: older recipient (P=0.03); smaller area of infarction in the biopsy specimen (P=0.04); and use of anti-AR therapy (P=0.03). Therapy was effective in patients with EI (treated, 71% survival; untreated, 29%, P=0.02) but not in patients with LI (25% vs. 23%). CONCLUSIONS: Allograft infarcts are associated with AR in 64% of patients, but the AR may be mild. Infarcts are associated with infections. Graft survival is worse in patients with infarcts than in patients with severe AR, consequently these two pathologic diagnoses should not be considered as a single entity.

Prophylactic cholecystectomy is not indicated following renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate management of gallstones in patients undergoing renal transplantation is controversial. Screening for gallstones and subsequent prophylactic cholecystectomy has been recommended by some authors for kidney transplant candidates. Our program does not practice routine pretransplant screening for gallstones, and we reviewed our data to determine the outcome of our management approach. METHODS: We reviewed the records of the 1,364 currently followed patients who have undergone kidney transplant at our institution since 1985 in order to evaluate the morbidity and mortality of biliary disease in the post-transplant period. We attempted to contact all patients by telephone or mail survey for the presence of biliary tract disease or operations. RESULTS: Six hundred and sixty-two patients were fully evaluated. Fifty-two (7.85%) required cholecystectomy for stone disease. Seven patients underwent incidental cholecystectomy during other operations, 2 patients developed acalculus cholecystitis, and 14 patients with asymptomatic cholelithiasis are being followed up. Surgical indications included 38 biliary colic, 9 acute cholcystitis, 3 gallstone pancreatitis, and 2 patients who were asymptomatic. Fifty-two patients underwent 30 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 20 open cholecystectomies, and 2 conversions. Surgery occurred from 7 days to 9.6 years following transplantation. Overall, the median hospital stay (no postoperative stay) was 4 days (range 1 to 57). Patients undergoing laparoscopy had a median stay of 2 days compared with 7 days for those undergoing an open procedure. Complications were seen in 6 patients (11.5%) with no morbidity and no graft loss. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year graft survival was 98%, 96%, and 85%, respectively, in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Transplant patients are not at an increased risk for developing biliary tract disease compared with nontransplant patients. Gallstone disease does not have a negative impact on graft survival. Treatment of gallstones has a low risk and does not represent an increased risk of complications in patients following renal transplantation.

Patient survival after renal transplantation: I. The impact of dialysis pre-transplant.

Patients on dialysis and recipients of renal transplants have higher mortality than individuals without kidney disease. In this study we evaluated the possible impact of dialysis therapy before transplantation on patient survival after the transplant. This analysis includes all of the patients who received a cadaveric renal transplant at The Ohio State University from 1984 to 1991 and who remained alive with functioning grafts for at least six months after the transplant (N = 523). After a follow-up of 84 +/- 14 months, 28% of the patients died and 23% lost their grafts. By multivariate analysis, reduced patient survival (censored at the time of graft loss) correlated with these pre-transplant variables: Older age (P < 0.0001), the presence of diabetes (P = 0.0002), smoking (P = 0.009), and the length of time on dialysis (P = 0.0002). Thus, 7% of patients who were never dialyzed, 23% of those dialyzed for less than three years, and 44% of patients dialyzed for > or = three years died post-transplant. By Cox regression, patient survival months correlated with time on dialysis pre-transplant (P = 0.0003). The type of dialysis (CAPD vs. hemodialysis) did not correlate with patient survival. Graft survival, censored for patient death, did not correlate with any of these pre-transplant variables. The relationship between time on dialysis and patient mortality is due to at least two factors: (1) transplant recipients who had dialysis for > or = 3 years had higher mortality due to infections (22%) than those who had dialysis for < 3 years (3%, P = 0.01 by X2); and (2) increasing time on dialysis increases the prevalence of both left ventricular hypertrophy (P = 0.008) and cardiomegaly (P = 0.004), and these relationships are statistically independent of other factors that also correlate with the prevalence of cardiovascular disease. In conclusion, increased time on dialysis prior to renal transplantation is associated with decreased survival of transplant recipients.

Function and survival of renal allografts from the same donor transplanted into kidney-only or kidney-pancreas recipients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess whether kidney-pancreas transplantation (KPT) compromises the prognosis of kidney transplantation (KT). METHODS: This study included 368 paired recipients who received grafts from the same donor (184 KPT/184 KT), i.e., renal grafts with the same pretransplant functional and pathologic characteristics. RESULTS: KPT recipients (KPR) were significantly younger and included fewer African-Americans (22% vs. 6%, P=0.0005) than recipients of kidney alone (KR). During year 1 after transplant surgery, KPR were re-admitted more often than KR (4.2+/-2 vs. 2.8+/-2, P < 0.0001). The number of acute rejections (AR) and the serum creatinine were not significantly different in KR and KPR up to 3 years after transplant. After 44+/-29 months, 13% of KR and 17% of KPR died (NS), and 17% of KR and 16% of KPR lost their kidneys (NS). In KPR, reduced renal graft survival did not correlate with AR (P=0.44), but it correlated with: older donors, younger recipients, elevated serum creatinine at 6 months, pancreas loss, and the number of episodes of acute graft dysfunction evaluated by biopsy (multivariate analysis). By Cox, graft and patient survival were not significantly different in KR and KPR. However, the patient survival of KPR < 40 years of age was lower than that of KR (P=0.02). Renal biopsies (n=165) in 40 paired recipients showed no significant differences in AR, interstitial fibrosis, or vascular pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Renal graft function, structure, and survival are not different in KPR and KR, but the correlates of renal graft survival are different in these two groups of recipients.

Impact of acute rejection and early allograft function on renal allograft survival.

Both acute rejection and the function of a renal allograft early after transplantation correlate with long-term graft survival. In this study we assessed the relationship between these two factors in 843 adult recipients of first cadaveric renal grafts, transplanted at a single institution and followed for a minimum of 3.5 years. Patients were divided into four groups according to (1) history of acute rejection (AR) during the first 6 months after transplantation, and (2) concentration of serum creatinine at 6 months after transplantation (SCr(6mo) < or > or = 2 mg/dl). Death censored allograft survival was not significantly different among patients without AR and with low SCr(6mo) (group 1, n=376), patients without AR but with an elevated SCr(6mo) (group 2, n=117), and patients with AR but low SCr(6mo) (group 3, n=185). In contrast, graft survival was significantly worse in patients with AR and an elevated SCr(6mo) (group 4, n=165) compared with patients in the other three groups (Cox, P<0.0001). The elevated SCr(6mo) in group 4 patients was not necessarily the consequence of AR, as 32% of patients in group 4 had a SCr at 10 days after transplantation (SCr(10d)), before they had AR, that was equal to or higher than the SCr(6mo). Based on this observation we investigated the implications of the SCr(10d) concentration for graft prognosis. The SCr(10d) correlated weakly with graft survival (Cox, P=0.05). However, an elevated SCr(10d) correlated with other potential risk factors for graft survival including: Older donors (P<0.0001), male recipients (P<0.0001), and heavier recipients (P<0.0001, all by multivariate regression); and posttransplant factors such as, increasing numbers of AR (P<0.0001), higher posttransplant blood pressure (P<0.0001), and lower doses of cyclosporine (P<0.0001, all by multivariate regression). In conclusion, graft dysfunction predicts poor graft survival only when associated with AR. Similarly, AR predicts a poor renal allograft survival only when associated with graft dysfunction. The SCr(10d) is an indicator of risk factors from both the donor and recipient, and an elevated SCr(10d) predicts a higher risk of acquiring additional risk factors early after transplantation.

Clinical and economic impact of flow cytometry crossmatching in primary cadaveric kidney and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients.

We retrospectively compared the clinical and financial impact of a final cross-match by T cell flow cytometry (FXM) versus conventional complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CXM) in consecutive primary cadaveric kidney (K) and primary simultaneous cadaveric pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients. Mean follow-up was 14 months for both the K (range, 5-22 months) and SPK (range, 5-22 months) recipients. There were no instances of a positive CXM result if the FXM result was negative. However, 18 of the 102 (18%) K recipients and 11 of the 66 (17%) SPK recipients were FXM positive, CXM negative, but no grafts lost to hyperacute rejection in this group. In addition, patient survival, graft survival, incidence of acute rejection, and kidney and pancreas function (immediate and late) were not different in the FXM-positive versus the FXM-negative groups. Charges for the CXM and FXM methods were compared over a 6-month period. During that period, the FXM charges averaged $583 less per recipient than the CXM charges (58% reduction in charges), and the time required to perform the FXM method was 50% of that required for the CXM method. These results demonstrate that a clinical pathway for primary transplantation that utilizes the FXM rather than the CXM final cross-match is clinically safe, with no adverse effect on posttransplant outcome, reduces organ preservation time by shortening the waiting period for the final cross-match results, and significantly reduces the tissue typing charges. However, about 9% of all primary K and SPK recipients will be FXM positive, CXM negative on final cross-match and will be unnecessarily denied a transplant. In this study, we describe a method to identify these patients so that they can be tested by traditional CXM to avoid being denied access to donor organs.

Relationships between arterial hypertension and renal allograft survival in African-American patients.

In previous studies, we showed that in African-American patients arterial hypertension during the first 6 months after transplantation is associated with a high risk of renal allograft loss. In this study, we sought to examine the relationships between pretransplant blood pressure (preBP), blood pressure early after transplantation (postBP), and allograft function and survival. The study included 116 African-American recipients of first cadaveric renal allografts followed for 64 +/- 40 months. Prior to transplantation, 78% of the patients required antihypertensive medications and 59% had poorly controlled BP (average mean arterial pressure, > or =107 mm Hg). Blood pressure levels increased significantly during the first month posttransplant, particularly in patients with poorly controlled preBP. During the first 6 months posttransplant, 95% of patients required antihypertensive drugs; after the transplant, patients required significantly more and higher doses of antihypertensives compared with pretransplant. In 38% of the patients, postBP remained high despite therapy. The level of postBP correlated with the patient's weight pretransplant and with the level of preBP. Pretransplant BP correlated with postBP 1 month after transplantation (r = 0.4, P < 0.0001), and 70% of the patients with poorly controlled postBP had uncontrolled preBP. Patients with poorly controlled preBP had worse graft survival than patients with well-controlled preBP (P = 0.03 by Cox regression). Furthermore, compared with patients with well-controlled postBP, patients with high postBP had higher serum creatinine at 10 days (P = 0.04) and at 6 months (P = 0.0004) posttransplant; these patients had reduced graft survival (P = 0.0006 by Cox). We found no objective evidence of differences in patient compliance between individuals with high postBP and those with well-controlled postBP. This study confirms the association between high postBP and reduced renal allograft survival in African-American patients. In addition, these results show that the level of preBP can be used to identify patients at high risk of developing severe hypertension immediately after transplantation and those at risk for renal allograft failure.