Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Public Health ; 10: 992122, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36466481

ABSTRACT

Background: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, it became apparent that members of marginalized populations and immigrants were also at risk of being hospitalized and dying more frequently from COVID-19. To examine how the pandemic affected underserved and marginalized populations, we analyzed data on changes in the number of deaths among people with and without Swiss citizenship during the first and second SARS-CoV-2 waves. Method: We analyzed the annual number of deaths from the Swiss Federal Statistical Office from 2015 to 2020, and weekly data from January 2020 to May 2021 on deaths of permanent residents with and without Swiss citizenship, and we differentiated the data through subdivision into age groups. Results: People without Swiss citizenship show a higher increase in the number of deaths in 2020 than those who were Swiss citizens. The increase in deaths compared to the previous year was almost twice as high for people without Swiss citizenship (21.8%) as for those with it (11.4%). The breakdown by age group indicates that among people between the ages of 64 and 75, those without Swiss citizenship exhibited an increase in mortality (21.6%) that was four times higher than that for people with Swiss citizenship (4.7%). Conclusion: This study confirms that a highly specialized health care system, as is found in Switzerland, does not sufficiently guarantee that all parts of the population will be equally protected in a health crisis such as COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Switzerland/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Cause of Death , Citizenship
3.
PLoS One ; 16(4): e0249609, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33798251

ABSTRACT

This study aims at investigating the nature of resilience and stress experience of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thirteen healthcare workers from Italian and Austrian hospitals specifically dealing with COVID-19 patients during the first phase of the pandemic were interviewed. Data was analysed using grounded theory methodology. Psychosocial effects on stress experience, stressors and resilience factors were identified. We generated three hypotheses. Hypothesis one is that moral distress and moral injury are main stressors experienced by healthcare workers. Hypothesis two states that organisational resilience plays an important part in how healthcare workers experience the crisis. Organisational justice and decentralized decision making are essential elements of staff wellbeing. Hypothesis three refers to effective psychosocial support: Basic on scene psychosocial support based on the Hobfoll principles given by trusted and well-known mental health professionals and peers in an integrated approach works best during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional/psychology , COVID-19 , Personnel, Hospital/psychology , Resilience, Psychological , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Austria , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Italy , Male , Morals , Pandemics , Psychosocial Support Systems , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 14(5): 563-567, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31416493

ABSTRACT

In the 19th century, triage emerged as an administrative concept to overcome the unjust and medically unreasonable consequences of an unsystematic adhoc selection of casualties. Until today, however, triage concepts are often applied incorrectly. High over-triage rates are a well-known phenomenon, which increase mortality rates. In order to examine their frequent occurrences, the article discusses different reasons and presents results of an experimental study. Two triage exercises were conducted: a paper-based triage exercise and a real-world simulation. Both exercises used the same case-vignettes consisting of 5 pairs. Each pair described a patient with the same injury pattern and vital parameters but with differing behaviour (calm/highly excited). Different behavior has a minor but no significant effect on over-triage rates. Over-triage is significantly higher in the real-world simulation than in the paper exercise. This is explained by the characteristics of face-to-face situations themselves: they are more complex and ambiguous, and hold more normative power. Accordingly, over-triage is understood as a means to resolve unclear situations ("better to over- than to under-triage") and to comply with normative demands "within" the strict margins of an administrative concept.


Subject(s)
Medical Overuse , Triage/standards , Allied Health Personnel/psychology , Allied Health Personnel/standards , Allied Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Medical Services/standards , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Germany , Humans , Patient Simulation , Triage/methods , Triage/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...