Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Oncol ; 21(1): 152-60, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19622590

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Asian centers have consistently reported superior gastric cancer outcomes. Our study examines gastric cancer survival among different races and ethnicities in a large, heterogeneous USA population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma treated in Los Angeles County from 1988 to 2006 were identified from the Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program. Patients were categorized by race and ethnicity as White, Asian, Hispanic and Black. RESULTS: Of 13 084 patients, 39% were White, 22% Asian, 28% Hispanic, 11% Black and 2% other. Asian patients demonstrated higher survival than Whites, Hispanics and Blacks [median survival (MS) 16.3 versus 8.4, 8.7 and 7.9 months, respectively; log-rank P values < 0.001]. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that Asians had improved probability of survival [hazard ratio (HR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.82; P < 0.001]. In patients who underwent curative-intent surgery, Asian patients demonstrated higher survival than Whites, Hispanics and Blacks (MS 32.7 versus 18.8, 19.9 and 18.9 months, respectively; log-rank P values < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that Asians had improved probability of survival after surgery (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.88; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Asians with gastric adenocarcinoma have superior outcomes in Los Angeles County. These outcomes verify disparities in gastric cancer survival among different races and ethnicities independent of established clinical and pathologic factors.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/ethnology , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/ethnology , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adult , Black or African American , Aged , Asian , Female , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , United States/epidemiology , White People
2.
Surg Endosc ; 20(10): 1521-5, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16897284

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With advanced stereoscopic vision, lack of tremor, and the ability to rotate the instruments surgeons find that robotic systems are ideal laparoscopic tools. Because of its high operating cost, however, robotic surgery should be reserved to procedures in which the technology can be of maximum benefit, usually when precise dissections in confined spaces are required. Because conventional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision is a challenging procedure, we have sought to assess the utility of the DaVinci robotic system in laparoscopic low anterior resections for cancer of the rectum. METHODS: Between November 2004 and May 2005 robotic-assisted low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision was performed on six consecutive patients with rectal cancer. These cases were compared with six consecutive low anterior resections performed with conventional laparoscopic techniques by the same surgeon. RESULTS: There were no conversions in either group. Operative and pathological data, complications, and hospital stay were similar in the two groups. Robotic operations appeared to cause less strain for the surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer is feasible in experienced hands. This technique may facilitate minimally invasive radical rectal surgery.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectum/surgery , Robotics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...